Hospitals & Asylums 

 

Welcome

Atlas

Litigation

Legislation

Statute

 

Black Medicare and Social Security Commissioner HA-17-6-13

 

Description: Description: Stanley Friendship - Acting Regional Commissioner, Seattle Region

Stanley Friendship, Seattle Regional SSA Commissioner

Carolyn W. Colvin

Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting SSA Commissioner

http://www.title24uscode.org/FREEIT_files/image001.jpg

Barack Obama, President of the USA

 

By Anthony J. Sanders

sanderstony@live.com

 

A BILL

 

To amend the DI tax rate to 2.61%, 1.305% for employees and 1.305% for employers under Sec. 201(b)(1)(S) of the Social Security Act 42USC(7)II§401 and the OASI tax rate to 9.79%, 4.895% for employee under 26USC(C)(21)(A)§3101 (a) and 4.895% for employers under 26USC(C)(21)(A)§3111 (a) without increasing the overall 12.4% OASDI or 15.3% OASDI and Hospital Insurance (HI) tax-rate under 26USC(A)(2)§1401. 

 

To require the Chief Actuary to account for SSI in the 2014 Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Old-Age Survivors Insurance and Federal Disability Insurance Trust Funds

 

To require the Chief Actuary to account for Medicaid in the 2014 Annual Report of the Hospital Insurance and Supplemental Medical Insurance Trust Funds

 

To commission an empirical survey of Social Security beneficiaries by race at the request of  the President, to investigate the possibility of statistically significant discrimination against blacks in the administration of social security benefits, aiming to redress this racial disparity with SSI on the rational basis of poverty under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 42USC(21)V§2000d-1

 

To eliminate discrimination (disclaimer) against naturalization papers in the administration of social security cards, state ID and passports

 

To discuss paying for SSI with OASDI without raising tax rates until 2020 to reduce the deficit

 

To purchase the rights to the balanced federal budget for $1,000 and Hospitals & Asylums work in general from the author for $1,000 a month DI

 

Be it enacted by the acting Commissioner of Social Security Carolyn W. Colvin.

 

Review of the Annual Reports of the Social Security Trustees

 

JACOB J. LEW,

Secretary of the Treasury, and

Managing Trustee of the Trust Funds.

 

SETH D. HARRIS,

Acting Secretary of Labor,

and Trustee.

 

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS,

Secretary of Health and Human Services,

and Trustee.

 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

and Trustee.

 

CHARLES P. BLAHOUS III,

Trustee.

 

ROBERT D. REISCHAUER,

Trustee.

 

DAVID A. WEAVER,

Associate Commissioner,

Office of Program Development and Research,

Social Security Administration,

and Acting Secretary, Board of Trustees.

 

MARILYN B. TAVENNER,

Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,

and Secretary, Boards of Trustees.

 

Table 1: SSI COLA, Rates, Beneficiaries, Payments, Administrative Costs 1974-2011

Table 2: Changes to OASDI if SSA paid for SSI 2013-2020

Table 3: Medicaid Population by State July 1, 1999

Table 4: Annual Random Survey of 3.6 Million Beneficiaries by Age, Race and Sex 2009

 

Review

 

At the end of 2012, the OASDI program was providing benefit payments1 to about 57 million people: 40 million retired workers and dependents of retired workers, 6 million survivors of deceased workers, and 11 million disabled workers and dependents of disabled workers. During the year, an estimated 161 million people had earnings covered by Social Security and paid payroll taxes. Total expenditures in 2012 were $786 billion. Total income was $840 billion, which consisted of $731 billion in non-interest income and $109 billion in interest earnings. Asset reserves held in special issue U.S. Treasury securities grew from $2,678 billion at the beginning of the year to $2,732 billion at the end of the year.  The Trustees project that the combined reserves of the OASI and DI Trust Funds will increase for the next several years, growing from $2,732 billion at the beginning of 2013 to $2,922 billion at the beginning of 2021. Beginning in 2021, annual cost exceeds total income, and therefore reserves begin to decline, reaching $2,866 billion at the beginning of 2023.  The Trustees measure financial adequacy by maintaining a trust fund ratio of 100 percent or more.  Total DI disbursements, which started to exceed non-interest income in 2005, continued to exceed such income in 2012. As in 2011, DI disbursements exceeded total DI income (including interest). The reserves in the DI Trust Fund at the end of calendar year 2012 totaled $122.7 billion, and consisted of $122.8 billion in U.S. Government obligations. At the beginning of calendar year 2012, the reserves of the DI Trust Fund represented 110 percent of annual cost. During 2012, DI cost exceeded income, and the trust fund ratio for the beginning of 2013 decreased to about 85 percent. The projected cost in excess of income results in the estimated depletion of the DI Trust Fund reserves by the end of 2016. Income and cost for the OASI Trust Fund represent over 80 percent of the corresponding amounts for the combined OASI and DI Trust Funds. Under current law, one trust fund cannot share financial resources with another trust fund (Goss '13: 4, 9, 29, 43). The DI tax rate must be amended to 2.61% as requested by the Chief Actuary in the 2012 Report, 1.305% for employees and 1.305% for employers under Sec. 201(b)(1)(S) of the Social Security Act 42USC(7)II§401 and the OASI tax rate to 9.79%, 4.895% for employee under 26USC(C)(21)(A)§3101 (a) and 4.895% for employers under 26USC(C)(21)(A)§3111 (a) without increasing the overall 12.4% OASDI or 15.3% OASDI and Hospital Insurance (HI) tax-rate under 26USC(A)(2)§1401 (Sanders '12).

 

Total Medicare expenditures were $574 billion in 2012. The Board projects that, under current law, expenditures will increase in future years at a somewhat faster pace than either aggregate workers’ earnings or the economy overall and that, as a percentage of GDP, they will increase from 3.6 percent in 2012 to 6.5 percent by 2087 (based on the Trustees’ intermediate set of assumptions). If lawmakers continue to override the statutory decreases in physician fees, and if the reduced price increases for other health services under Medicare are not sustained and do not take full effect in the long range, then Medicare spending would instead represent roughly. 9.8 percent of GDP in 2087. Growth of this magnitude, if realized, would substantially increase the strain on the nation’s workers, the economy, Medicare beneficiaries, and the Federal budget. HI services are inpatient hospital, skilled nursing facility, home health, and hospice. The primary Part B services affected are outpatient hospital, home health, and dialysis. The Trustees set the per beneficiary growth rate for these services equal to the sum of the statutory price update and the assumed growth in the volume and intensity of services per person. The first factor equals the market basket price increase (3.6 percent) minus the productivity adjustment (1.1 percent), for a statutory price update of 2.5 percent per year. The second factor equals the year-by-year increase in the volume and intensity assumption from the “factors contributing to growth” model less the ACA growth impact of 0.1 percent. Under the Trustees’ intermediate economic assumptions, the resulting year-by-year increases for these provider services start at 4.5 percent in 2037, or “GDP plus 0.4 percent,” declining gradually to 3.6 percent in 2087, or “GDP minus 0.5 percent.” On average, the resulting ultimate cost growth rate for these provider services is 4.3 percent, or “GDP plus 0.2 percent" (Spitalnic '13: 8, 9, 16, 17).  The proceeds of the tax provisions of the ACA, which extends Medicare taxation to income, without limit, are not evident because they were stolen by the General Fund, but there is no cause for concern for the solvency of Medicare in the immediate future only interference with health care matters by the federal government.  The names of the CMS administrator Ms. Tavenner and acting Chief Actuary Mr. Spitalnic warn against dependency upon health care providers who can no longer be relied upon for moral support, as of the annual report dated May 31, 2013 (nerds beware)!!!

 

The Social Security Administration makes special payments to uninsured persons who meet certain requirements. The General Fund of the Treasury largely reimburses costs associated with providing such payments. Although there was no reimbursement in 2012, a reimbursement of about $1 thousand is scheduled for 2013, reflecting costs incurred in fiscal year 2011. The DI Trust Fund pays for benefits to disabled workers who: (1) satisfy the disability insured requirements; (2) are unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity due to a medically determinable physical or mental impairment severe enough to satisfy the requirements of the program; and (3) have not yet attained normal retirement age. Spouses and children of such disabled workers may also receive DI benefits provided they satisfy certain criteria, primarily age and earnings requirements. Beneficiaries stop receiving disability benefits when they die, recover from their medically-determinable disabling condition, or return to work. Eligibility for worker benefits under the OASDI program requires some threshold level of work in covered employment. A worker satisfies this requirement by his or her accumulation of quarters of coverage (QCs). Prior to 1978, a worker earned one QC for each calendar quarter in which he or she earned at least $50. In 1978, when annual earnings reporting replaced quarterly reporting, the amount required to earn a QC (up to a maximum of four per year) was set at $250. As specified in the law, the Social Security Administration has adjusted this amount each year since then according to changes in the AWI. Its value in 2013 is $1,160.  There are three types of insured status that a worker can acquire under the OASDI program. The number and recency of QCs earned determine each status. A worker acquires fully insured status when his or her total number of QCs is greater than or equal to the number of years elapsed after the year of attainment of age 21 (but not less than six). Once a worker has accumulated 40 QCs, he or she remains permanently fully insured. A worker acquires disability insured status if he or she is: (1) a fully insured worker who has accumulated 20 QCs during the 40-quarter period ending with the current quarter; (2) a fully insured worker aged 24-30 who has accumulated QCs during one half of the quarters elapsed after the quarter of attainment of age 21 and up to and including the current quarter; or (3) a fully insured worker under age 24 who has accumulated six QCs during the 12-quarter period ending with the current quarter. A worker acquires currently insured status when he or she has accumulated six QCs during the 13-quarter period ending with the current quarter. Periods of disability reduce the number of quarters required for insured status, but not below the minimum of six QCs (Goss '13: 26, 126,127, 129, 118, 119).

 

The SSI program is a nationwide Federal assistance program administered by SSA that guarantees a minimum level of income for needy aged, blind, or disabled individuals. It acts as a safety net for individuals who have limited resources and little or no Social Security or other income.  Under the SSI program, the monthly Federal cash payment in 2011 for an eligible person living in his or her own household and having no other countable income is $674 ($1,011 for a couple if both members are eligible). During 2010, 8.6 million aged, blind, or disabled individuals received at least 1 month’s Federal SSI benefit. In January 2011, 8.0 million individuals received Federally-administered monthly SSI benefits averaging $500.  Of these, 7.7 million received monthly Federal SSI payments averaging $478, up from 7.5 million recipients with an average payment of $476 in January 2010 and 2.4 million received monthly State supplementation payments averaging $125.  This group was composed of 1.1 million aged recipients, 6.4 million disabled recipients, and 65 thousand blind recipients. Of the 6.5 million blind or disabled recipients, 1.2 million were under age 18, and 0.8 million were aged 65 or older.  As a percentage of the total U.S. population, the number of Federal SSI recipients increased slightly from 2.37 percent in 2009 to 2.42 percent in 2010.  In 2010 applicant success ran at about 45.8%.  During calendar year 2010, 2.4 million individuals applied for SSI benefits based on blindness or disability, an increase of 3 percent over 2009. Additionally, 148 thousand applied for SSI benefits based on age, an increase of less than 1 percent over 2009. In 2010, 1.1 million applicants were awarded SSI benefits, an increase of 5 percent as compared to the 1.0 million awarded benefits in 2009. Each month on average during calendar year 2010, 7.6 million individuals received Federal SSI benefits.  Federal SSI expenditures expressed as a percentage of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) were 0.293 in 2008 and increased to 0.325 percent of GDP in 2009 due to the economic recession. After increasing slightly to 0.326 percent of GDP in 2010, SSA projects that expenditures as a percentage of GDP will decrease slightly to 0.324 percent of GDP in 2011, and continue to decline thereafter to 0.244 percent of GDP by 2035.  Federal expenditures for cash payments under the SSI program during calendar year 2010 increased 4.1 percent to $47.8 billion, while the funds made available to administer the SSI program in fiscal year 2010 increased 9.2 percent to $3.7 billion. In 2009 the corresponding program and administrative expenditures were $45.9 billion and $3.4 billion, respectively.  Administration increased more than twice as fast as beneficiaries. Administrative costs rose from 7.4% to 7.7% in 2010.  SSI administrative costs are too high.  SSI must be deregulated to reduce paperwork and not interfere with cottage industry (Sanders '11: 22-24)..

 

SSI COLA, Rates, Beneficiaries, Payments, Administrative Costs 1974-2011

 

Year

COLA

Benefit Rate

Total Beneficiary

(thousand)

Federal Payments (millions)

Admin.

Costs (millions)

1974

4.3%

$146.00

3,996

16,741

 

1980

14.3%

$238.00

4,142

15,470

668

1990

4.7%

$386.00

4,817

21,724

1,075

2000

2.5%

$513.00

6,602

36,906

2,321

2001

3.5%

$531.00

6,688

38,112

2,397

2002

2.6%

$545.00

6,788

38,935

2,522

2003

1.4%

$552.00

6,902

39,680

2,656

2004

2.1%

$564.00

6,988

40,155

2,806

2005

2.7%

$579.00

7,114

40,824

2,795

2006

4.1%

$603.00

7,236

41,502

2,916

2007

3.3%

$623.00

7,360

42,208

2,857

2008

2.3%

$637.00

7,521

43,143

2,820

2009

5.8%

$674.00

7,677

47,429

3,316

2010

0.0%

$674.00

7,912

48,357

3,629

2011

0.0%

$674.00

7,866

49,038

3,931

2012

3.6%

$698.00

8,057

52,010

3,766

Source: Annual Report of the SSI Program 2011 Table IV. A2. pp. 28; Table IV.B9 pp. 44; Table IV. C3. pp. 48; Table IV.E1. pp. 52

 

Notices were sent out in March 2011 to terminate 44,096 SSI beneficiaries in March, social work month, and retro-active payments, dating to December 2010 when a 0.55% total decline in enrollment was led by a 4.5% decline in beneficiaries receiving only federal SSI payments.  In his April newsletter Senator Bernie Sanders (S-Vt) expressed the public outrage of hundreds of protesting beneficiaries.  This is not the first time the number of SSI beneficiaries has declined.  In October 2009 the total number of SSI beneficiaries declined by 9,264 (0.12% of population) for savings of $69,709,000 (1.7% of monthly spending).  In December 2009 total beneficiaries declined by 45,223 (0.5%) saving $50,456,000 (1.2%).  In July 2010 total beneficiaries declined 6,354 (0.07%) saving $79,520,000 (1.86%).  In December 2010 total beneficiaries declined by 44,096 (0.55%) netting only $22,874,000 (0.53%).  December 2010 stands out as a particularly criminal violation of civil rights statute pertaining to the deprivation of relief benefits under 18USC(13)§246  which applies equitably to the horrible economic scourge of $666 ($674) SSI for three years without COLA.  The only operation made available this political capital at the end of the year when Congress came to ask what they had done with their windfall was the termination of benefits to reduce the occurrence of improper payments.  One of the most common forms of standardization is price indexing, which uses some measure of change in the prices of consumer goods. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, Department of Labor, publishes one such price index, the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPIW, hereafter referred to as CPI). The Social Security Administration (SSA) uses this index to determine the annual cost-of-living increases for OASDI monthly benefits. The Trustees assume the ultimate annual rate of increase in the CPI will be 1.8, 2.8, and 3.8 percent for the low-cost, intermediate, and high-cost sets of assumptions, respectively. Table VI.F7 provides CPI indexed dollar values (those adjusted using the CPI in table VI.F6), which indicate the relative purchasing power of the values over time. Wage indexing is another type of standardization. It combines the effects of price inflation and real-wage growth. The wage index presented here is the national average wage index, as defined in section 215(i)(1)(G) of the Social Security Act. SSA uses this index to annually adjust the contribution and benefit base and other earnings-related program amounts. The Trustees assume that the average wage will grow by an average rate of 3.5, 3.9, and 4.3 percent under the low-cost, intermediate, and high-cost assumptions, respectively, between 2022 and 2087. Wage-indexed values indicate the level of a series relative to the standard of living of workers over time (Goss '13: 203).  Having ended the SSI $666 ($674) for three years without COLA SSA must (stop chaining benefits to GDP growth, guarantee 3% COLA) ensure that beneficiaries of Title I and II of the Social Security Act who were singled out for cruel and unusual sentences of years at reduced benefits in the $600-$699 range are brought to safety above the $700 line, restored to their previous benefit amount and issued a special check for the underpayment, redetermined to $1,000 a month for their service, or a reliable $1,000 reimbursement.

 

OMB has never accurately accounted for on-budget and off-budget SSA spending and must pay closer attention to the Annual Report of the Trustees to Congress that comes out in April of each year, that needs to expanded itself to include study of SSI spending, in consideration of paying for SSI with the combined Old Age Survivor Disability Insurance (OASDI) trust funds, without raising overall OASDI taxation until after 2020, and we have satisfactorily made a withdrawal from what has become over the past decade the largest savings account in the world.  In 2012 the annual report of the OASDI trust funds indicates that off-budget receipts amounted to an estimated $733.9 billion FY 2012, taking into consideration $112.1 billion reimbursed by the General Fund for the unwise and insignificant 2% OASDI tax relief, and $788.7 billion in expenditures, $777.7 billion for benefits.  In FY 2013 reimbursements are scheduled to go down to $2.7 billion for total off-budget revenues of $870.7 billion and $832.3 billion in expenditures.  For OMB SSA off-budget column, it is probably best to account for total revenues, but normally it makes no difference to the federal budget.  What then do the on-budget statistics mean for the federal budget?  The on-budget statistics include the reasonable cost of administration plus SSI, until SSA is given responsibility for paying for SSI by Act of Congress, and the cost of reimbursing the unwise 2% OASI tax relief.  The figures provided by OMB are however $6.8 billion over in FY 2008 to $22.2 billion over in FY 2009, going down to $8.8 billion over in FY 2010 and $3 billion over in FY 2011 before becoming statistically significant at $24.6 billion in FY 2012 and $47.8 billion in FY 2013.  OMB needs to revise on-budget statistics to reflect actual spending reported in the Annual Reports.  The then Commissioner is principally responsible for the +/-$666 ($674) for three years without Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) December 2008-2012 that caused the 99.9% of the Great Recession by racketeering Hospitals & Asylums (HA), producer of the highly infringed only balanced budget since 2005 using a strategy of military spending reduction and OASI surplus return to the General Fund, now obsolete in favor of total management of all federal agency budgets, if not committing and covering up mass genocide upon 50 million beneficiaries, 7 million or so marked with the number of the beast 2008-2011 and 1 million wise afterwards due >$700 a month and settlement of their written claim, to the degradation of constitutional governance (and national life expectancy in 2008 now covered up).  The question is when will Congress wise up and require SSA pay for SSI saving the General Fund $52 billion (base year FY 2012) plus 7% annual growth.  It was wrong under antitrust principles for Congress to reimburse SSA for a 2% OASDI tax reduction and needs to stop at the soonest possible time October 1, 2012, the first day of FY 2013 is the time.  This harmful error must cease and must not be remembered by historians and propagandists as anything but a harmful error that caused massive layoffs and stifled economic growth from America’s usual 3% 2011-2012 to an anemic 1.4% mid-year 2012.  Reason being, we all know, if we haven’t been brainwashed by trust fund propaganda, we have to make a significant withdrawal from the largest savings account in the world – the OASDI Trust Fund – and doctor the deficit, by making OASDI pay for SSI, without increasing the overall 12.4% OASDI tax rate, until after 2020.  The people should be informed of the true cost of disability with a legislated 3.6% DI+SSI and 8.8% OASI tax split 50/50 between employers and employees.  The SSA Chief Actuary must be immediately required to include SSI in the Annual Report to Congress, for the agency to be prepared to withdraw OASDI assets to a $2.4 trillion limit (Sanders '12: 3b).. 

 

Changes to OASDI if SSA paid for SSI 2013-2020

 

 

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

OASDI Net Increase at end of year

69,000

57,300

41,100

42,400

43,100

SSI  7% annual growth from 2012

49,038

52,010

55,650

59,546

63,714

Revised Net Increase

n/a

n/a

-14,550

-17,146

-20,614

Revised OASDI Balance

 

 

2,720, 650

2,703,504

2,682,890

Current OASDI Balance

2,677,900

2,735,200

2,776,300

2,818,800

2,861,900

 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

OASDI Net Increase at end of year

46,200

49,700

48,900

36,900

17,300

SSI  7% annual growth from 2012

68,175

72,947

78,053

83,517

89,363

Revised Net Increase

-21,975

-23,247

-29,153

-46,617

-72,063

Revised OASDI Balance

2,660,915

2,637,668

2,608,515

2,561,898

2,489,835

Current OASDI Balance

2,908,100

2,957,800

3,006,800

3,043,700

3,061,000

Sources: 2012 Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance Trust Funds, Table IV.A.3 Operations of the Combined OASI and DI Trust Funds 2007-21; 2012 Annual Report of the SSI Program, Annual Report of the Advisory Council 2012 and Table C.1 SSI Federal Payment in Current Dollars 1974-2012; The Revised OASDI Balance may not take into account adjusted interest earnings.

 

Medicare is a nationwide, federally administered health insurance program authorized in 1965 under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to cover the cost of hospitalization, medical care, and some related services for most people age 65 and over. In 1972, lawmakers extended coverage to people receiving Social Security Disability Insurance payments for 2 years and people with End-Stage Renal Disease. (For beneficiaries whose primary or secondary diagnosis is Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, the 2-year waiting period is waived.) In 2010, people exposed to environmental health hazards within areas under a corresponding emergency declaration became Medicare-eligible.  In 2006, prescription drug coverage was added as well. Medicare consists of two separate but coordinated trust funds—Hospital Insurance (HI, Part A) and Supplementary Medical Insurance (SMI). The SMI trust fund is composed of two separate accounts—the Part B account and the Part D account. Almost all persons who are aged 65 and over or disabled and who are entitled to HI are eligible to enroll in Part B and Part D on a voluntary basis by paying monthly premiums (Goss '13: 224, 225). In 2012, Medicare covered 50.7 million people: 42.1 million aged 65 and older, and 8.5 million disabled. About 27 percent of these beneficiaries have chosen to enroll in Part C private health plans that contract with Medicare to provide Part A and Part B health services. Total expenditures in 2012 were $574.2 billion. Total income was $536.9 billion, which consisted of $523.5 billion in non-interest income and $13.4 billion in interest earnings. Assets held in special issue U.S. Treasury securities decreased by $37.3 billion to $287.6 billion. Under current law, payments would be reduced to levels that could be covered by incoming tax and premium revenues when the HI trust fund was depleted.  The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, introduced even larger policy changes and projection uncertainty. This legislation, referred to collectively as the “Affordable Care Act” or ACA, contains roughly 165 provisions affecting the Medicare program by reducing costs, increasing revenues, improving benefits, combating fraud and abuse, and initiating a major program of research and development to identify alternative provider payment mechanisms, health care delivery systems, and other changes intended to improve the quality of health care and reduce costs. To date, lawmakers have never allowed the assets of the Medicare HI trust fund to become depleted. Under the ACA, Medicare’s annual payment rate updates for most categories of providers would be reduced below the increase in providers’ input prices by the growth in economy-wide multifactor productivity (1.1 percent over the long range). In addition, the IPAB would be charged with recommending cost savings as are necessary to hold overall per capita Medicare growth to the average of the CPI and CPI-medical increases in 2015-2019 and to the rate of per capita GDP growth plus 1 percentage point thereafter (subject to certain limits).  The ACA specifies that individuals with incomes greater than $200,000 per year and couples above $250,000 pay an additional “Medicare contribution” of 3.8 percent on some or all of their non-work income (such as investment earnings). However, the revenues from this tax are not allocated to the Medicare trust funds (Spitalnic '1: 6, 2, 24). 

 

To establish a suitable base from which to project future HI costs, the incurred payments for services provided must be constructed for the most recent period for which a reliable determination can be made. Accordingly, payments to providers must be attributed to dates of service, rather than to payment dates; in addition, the nonrecurring effects of any changes in regulations, legislation, or administration, and of any items affecting only the timing and flow of payments to providers, must be eliminated.  For those services still reimbursed on a reasonable-cost basis, the costs for covered services are determined on the basis of provider cost reports. Reimbursement for these services occurs in two stages. First, bills are submitted by providers to the intermediaries, and interim payments are made on the basis of these bills. The second stage takes place at the close of a provider’s accounting period, when a cost report is submitted and lump-sum payments or recoveries are made to correct for the difference between interim payments and final settlement amounts for providing covered services (net of coinsurance and deductible amounts). Tabulations of the bills are prepared by date of service, and the lump-sum settlements, which are reported only on a cash basis, are adjusted (using approximations) to allocate them to the time of service. In late 2008, CMS suspended payments to a number of home health agencies and increased program integrity efforts for this category of services. From 2010 onward, outlier payments to agencies have been capped as a percentage of total payments. Assumed growth rates for home health expenditures reflect this initiative, along with the ongoing effects of growth in the number of beneficiaries, payment rates, utilization of services, and legislated changes affecting future payments. Medicare payment rates for inpatient hospital services are about 67 percent of those paid by private health insurance.  The average complexity of hospital admissions (case mix) is expected to increase by 0.5 percent annually in fiscal years 2013 through 2037 as a result of an assumed continuation of the current trend toward treating less complicated cases in outpatient setting.  Medicare payments for physician services are based on a fee schedule, which reflects the relative level of resources required for each service. The fee schedule amount is equal to the product of the procedure’s relative value, a conversion factor, and a geographic adjustment factor (Spitalnic '13: 107, 110, 119.136, 137, 144, 145, 208, 126).  Together Medicare and Medicaid serve more than 87 million people.  Medicaid pays approximately 1 in 5 health care dollars and 1 in 2 nursing home dollars.  The Medicaid Program provides medical benefits to groups of low-income people, some who may have no medical insurance or inadequate medical insurance. Although the Federal government establishes general guidelines for the program, the Medicaid program requirements are actually established by each State. Whether or not a person is eligible for Medicaid depends upon the State where he or she lives (Sanders '11: 461, 462 §96).  Universal health insurance is achieved through Medicaid expansion (Sanders '08).

 

Medicaid Population by State July 1, 1999

State of Residence  Residents (1,000s) Medicare Pop. (1,000) Enrollees %  Medicaid $

United States

272,691

38,319

14.1

188,456,539,000

Alabama

4,370

678

15.5

2,426,546,629

Alaska

620

40

6.5

407,574,922

Arizona

4,778

661

13.8

1,977,585,436

Arkansas

2,551

431

16.9

1,472,148,586

California

33,145

3,861

11.6

18,322,124,498

Colorado

4,056

462

11.4

1,840,149,345

Connecticut

3,282

515

15.7

3,106,833,711

Delaware

754

112

14.9

464,675,516

District of Columbia

519

76

14.6

812,307,451

Florida

15,111

2,793

18.5

5,842,382,222

Georgia

7,755

910

11.7

3,762,757,168

Hawaii

1,185

164

13.8

605,014,726

Idaho

1,252

161

13.0

517,507,218

Illinois

12,128

1,622

13.4

6,755,100,123

Indiana

5,943

838

14.1

2,977,949,366

Iowa

2,869

457

16.6

1,461,173,214

Kansas

2,654

385

14.5

1,106,965,283

Kentucky

3,961

612

15.5

2,770,613,802

Louisiana

4,372

595

13.6

3,384,670,228

Maine

1,253

214

17.1

1,178,880.711

Maryland

5,172

635

12.3

3,014,952,844

Massachusetts

6,175

972

15.4

5,446,127,975

Michigan

9,664

1,385

14.0

6,158,362,777

Minnesota

4,776

647

13.5

3,119,764,555

Mississippi

2,769

414

15.0

1,843,880,902

Missouri

5,468

852

15.6

3,639,967,302

Montana

883

135

15.3

424,328,043

Nebraska

1,666

253

15.2

984,253,204

Nevada

1,809

235

13.0

559,503,198

New Hampshire

1,201

165

13.7

787,062,321

New Jersey

8,143

1,201

14.7

5,772,631,914

New Mexico

1,740

230

13.2

1,103,690,454

New York

18,197

2,674

14.7

28,673,589,131

North Carolina

7,651

1,112

14.5

4,967,172,053

North Dakota

634

102

16.1

346,720,664

Ohio

11,257

1,697

15.1

5,908,994,760

Oklahoma

3,358

503

15.0

1,496,145,904

Oregon

3,316

490

14.6

1,962,544,049

Pennsylvania

11,994

2,082

17.4

9,556,752,320

Rhode Island

981

168

17.0

1,063,037,589

South Carolina

3,886

556

14.3

2,472,958,395

South Dakota

733

118

16.1

377,830,154

Tennessee

5,484

815

14.9

4,159,707,338

Texas

20,044

2,226

11.1

10,350,823,295

Utah

2,130

204

9.6

756,590,971

Vermont

514

88

14.6

473,137,876

Virginia

6,173

878

12.8

2,487,100,612

Washington

5,250

724

12.6

3,564,389,167

West Virginia

1,807

336

18.6

1,355,044,060

Wisconsin

5,250

770

14.7

2,738,075,303

Wyoming

480

64

13.3

204,334,030

Source: Sanders '11: 461, 462; §96; Fig. 3.36

 

A civil right is an enforceable right or privilege for an individual, which if interfered with by another gives rise to an action for injury. Examples of civil rights are freedom of speech, press, assembly, the right to vote, freedom from slavery and involuntary servitude, and the right to equality in public places.  Discrimination occurs when the civil rights of an individual are denied or interfered with because of their membership in a particular group or class.  Statutes have been enacted to prevent discrimination based on a person’s race, gender, religion, age, previous condition of servitude, disability, national origin and in some instances sexual preference.  The Social Security Act contains no provisions regarding discrimination.  Severer punishments for crimes were imposed on the slave than on free persons guilty of the same offenses and continue to be imposed on racial minorities committing the same crime as whites. Congress, by the civil rights bill of 1866, passed in view of the thirteenth amendment, before the fourteenth was adopted, undertook to wipe out these burdens and disabilities, incidental to slavery, and to secure to all citizens of every race and color, and without regard to previous servitude, those fundamental rights which are the essence of civil freedom, namely, the same right to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, and convey property, as is enjoyed by white citizens.  In 1868 the 14th Amendment was passed to counter the "black codes" and ensure that no state "shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of the citizens of the United States or deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, or deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”.  Racial and sexual disparities are particularly evident in state and federal prison. In 2007 7% of all inmates were women. In the 25-29 age group, 8.1% of black men - about one in 13 – were behind bars, compared with 2.6% of Hispanic men and 1.1% of white men.  SSA may be equally discriminatory although their local offices are heavily staffed with women and minorities.  State welfare program have exhibited much higher rates of sanctions for non-compliance with program rules amongst racial minorities, especially African Americans who have been previously sanctioned.  The Social Security Administration (SSA) needs to produce an authentic Annual Statistical Supplement, of all their beneficiaries by race, sex and national origin.  SSA numbers should suffice to determine national origin and the paperwork takes into consideration age, race, sex and disability.  New questions can survey religion.  The President needs to approve statistical surveys of the number of beneficiaries and benefit amount to ensure non-discrimination against beneficiaries of Federal Assistance Programs on the basis of race, sex, disability, religion or national origin under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 42USC(21)V§2000d-1. 

 

Annual Random Survey of 3.6 Million Beneficiaries by Age, Race and Sex 2009

 

 

All

Male

Female

All Races

White

Black

Other

Average Benefit of Retired Workers

1,182

1,366

974

1,182

1,229

1,073

964

Average Benefit of Disabled Workers

1,120

1,255

963

1,120

1,180

1,014

963

Number of Retired Workers

2,739,966

1,452,329

1,287,637

2,739,966

2,147,458

246,045

346,463

Number of Disabled Workers

970,696

521,424

449,272

970,696

655,392

173,181

136,536

Actual Number of Retired Workers

37 million

Actual Number of Disabled Workers

10 million

Actual Number of Survivors

6 million

FICA Taxpayers

157 million

Source: Annual Statistical Supplement, 2010. February 2011 is a purely academic survey of race, gender or average price, using a random sample that is clearly not representative. Actual Statistics come from the 2011 Annual Report of the Trustees

 

Because SSA actively conspires to deny naturalized U.S. citizens their identification cards (Social Security Cards) it is necessary identify this issue of identification theft left untreated by the Inspector General although local SSA officials neither accept naturalization papers nor do they conduct an investigation to procure proof of citizenship to issue social security cards to known beneficiaries.  Discrimination against naturalization in the issuance of identification documents must be eliminated. This is a new development by Obama's adversarial birther movement employing countless lawyers in meaningless cruise ship like immigration jobs. Naturalized U.S. Citizens have a right be issued identification documents - social security cards, driver's license, state identification, and passports - at no extra cost, and are due costs from the U.S for delinquency incurred by this major fraud, in civil rights, more of a conspiracy against rights than deprivation of rights under color of law. USCIS conceals the validity of naturalization papers, with a disclaimer, while the Authentification Office in the State Department collects bribes demanding the "original" naturalization paper they stole two administrations ago. The bribery conviction in the statute seems to have been concealed, before the passage of legislation, in violation of 18USC(27)§551. The real long-term issue driving sado-masochists to express themselves criminally is officers aiding importation of obscene or treasonous book or article under 18USC(27)§552, forcibly resisting changing the name of Title 22 Foreign Relations and Intercourse (a-FRaI-d) to Foreign Relations (FR-ee), Court of International Trade of the United States (COITUS) to Customs Court (CC) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to U.S. Customs as directed by Customs House Act, St. Elizabeth (CHASTE).

 

Bibliography

 

Goss, Stephen C. The 2013 Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Old-Age Survivors Insurance and Federal Disability Insurance Trust Funds. Chief Actuary, Social Security Administration. May 31, 2013

 

Sanders, Tony J. Defense of Social Security Caucus. Hospitals & Asylums HA-1-7-11

 

-- Customs House Act St. Elizabeth (CHASTE) HA-26-2-11/HA-5-9-11

 

-- Disability Insurance Replenishment Tax (DIRT). Hospitals & Asylums HA-16-6-12

 

-- Federal Budget Balanced to Prevent Debt from Exceeding 100% of GDP FY 2012. Hospitals & Asylums HA-13-7-12

 

-- Health and Welfare. Book 3. 8th Ed. Hospitals & Asylums HA-14-7-12

 

-- National Health Insurance: Compromise to Immediately Achieve Single Payer Universal Coverage and Progressively Realize National Health Insurance that is Free for All. Hospitals & Asylums HA-28-4-08

 

Spitalnic, Paul. 2013 Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Hospital Insurance and Supplemental Medical Insurance Trust Funds. Acting Chief Actuary. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. May 31, 2013