Hospitals & Asylums
Snowden ex. rel. v. President Obama; National Security Administration (NSA) HA-6-1-14
By Anthony J. Sanders
Edward Snowden is
an American computer specialist, a former Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA) employee, and former National Security
Agency (NSA) contractor who disclosed classified NSA documents
to several media outlets regarding such programs
as PRISM, XKeyscore and Tempora, as well as the
interception of US and European telephone metadata, for moral reasons
despite salary in the neighborhood of $200,000 a year. The National Security Administration
(NSA) was created July 15, 1949. The War
Department
was renamed Department of Defense (DoD) in the Secretary of Defense Transfer
Order No. 40 of July 22, 1949 leaving the U.S. in need of a Military Department
(MD). The Government has not proved
that the acts of which their former employee was accused constitute common
crimes and Russia, the world's second largest penal population after the U.S.,
has conceded to grant him asylum from prosecution. Principle 20 of the Johannesburg Principles on National Security, Freedom of
Expression and Access to Information, of November 1996 provides that any person accused of a security related crime
regarding freedom of expression shall be entitled to all of the rule of law
including the right not to be arbitrarily detained. Wherefore the United States must drop
the espionage and theft of government property charges and return his
diplomatic visa. The professional
treatment of 'espionage' is honorable discharge!!!
Cases
6th Cir. ACLU v. NSA HA-6-7-07
International Court of Justice. Asylum Case (Columbia/Peru) Request for the Interpretation of the
Judgment of November
20, 1950.
International Court of Justice. Obligation to Negotiate Access to the Pacific Ocean (Bolivia/Chile) 2013
New York Times v.
Sullivan 37 U.S. 254 (1964)
Leon J.
Klayman v. Obama (Nos. 13-cv-851 & 13-cv-881)
Pauly J. ACLU v. Clapper (13 Civ. 3994).
Snowden v. Hughes, 321
U.S. 1 (1944)
Treaties
Declaration on Territorial Asylum 2312 (XXII) of 14 December 1967
Statute
Alien and Sedition Acts; Alien Act of July 6, 1798; Sedition Act of July 14, 1798; Virginia Resolutions of December 28, 1798; Draft of the Kentucky Resolution of October 1798; Kentucky Resolution on the Alien and Sedition Acts passed December 3, 1799
Asylum
8USC(12)II§1158
Authorization for programs for domestic
resettlement of and assistance to refugees 8USC(12)§1522
First Amendment Privacy Protection 42USC(21A)§2000aa
FISA Act 50USC(36)I§1809
Recovery of civil damages 18USC(119)§2520
Unlawful intrusion and violation of the rules and
regulations 24USC(3)V§154
Reports
Epps, Garrett ed. The First Amendment Freedom of the Press. Its Constitutional History and the
Contemporary Debate. Prometheus Books. New York. 2008
Haynes, Charles C.; Chaltain, Sam; Glisson, Susan M. First Freedoms: A Documentary History of First Amendment Rights in America. Oxford University Press. New York. 2006
Goodman,
Melvin A. National Insecurity: The Cost of American Militarism. Open Media
Series. City Lights Books. San Francisco. 2013
Paine, Thomas. Common Sense. 1776
Posner, Richard A. The Little Book
of Plagiarism. Pantheon Books New York. 2007
Review Group on
Intelligence and Communications Technologies released
'Liberty and Security in a Changing World: Report and Recommendation' on
12 December 2013
Sanders, Tony J. Constitution of
Hospitals & Asylums Non-Governmental Economy (CHANGE)
Sanders,
Tony J. Empirical US Foreign
Assistance Statistics at the Close of the American Imperial Century: An Act to Secure a Voluntary 1
percent ODA Tax on Income
HA-31-9-10
Sanders, Tony J. Freedom of the Press HA-25-1-10
Sanders, Tony J. Lame
Duck Speak HA-1-1-14
Sanders,
Tony J. Pardon Rod Blagojevich HA-19-1-13
Sanders, Tony J. Wikileaks: Honorable Discharge of Bradley Manning HA-31-1-12
Edward Joseph Snowden (born
June 21, 1983) is an American computer specialist, a former Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) employee, and former National Security
Agency (NSA) contractor who disclosed classified NSA
documents to several media outlets, initiating the NSA leaks, which reveal operational details of a global
surveillance apparatus run by the NSA.
Snowden's release of classified material was called the most significant
leak in US history by Pentagon Papers leaker Daniel Ellsberg. A series
of exposés beginning June 5, 2013 revealed Internet surveillance programs
such as PRISM, XKeyscore and Tempora, as well as the
interception of US and European telephone metadata. The reports were based
on documents Snowden leaked to The Guardian and The
Washington Post while employed by NSA contractor Booz Allen
Hamilton. According to Snowden, his "sole motive" for leaking
the documents was "to inform the public as to that which is done in their
name and that which is done against them." The disclosures have
fueled debates over mass surveillance, government secrecy, and the
balance between national security and information privacy. Seven
months after the NSA revelations began, Snowden declared his mission
accomplished, citing the international debate sparked by his leaks. Snowden is
considered a fugitive by American authorities who have charged him
with espionage and theft of government property. He is currently
living in Russia under temporary asylum.
Crediting the Snowden leaks, a United Nations committee unanimously
adopted an 'anti-spying resolution' to 'protect the right to privacy against
unlawful surveillance' in the wake of reports that 35
foreign leaders were subjects of US eavesdropping. The European Parliament
invited Snowden to make a pre-recorded video appearance to aid their NSA
investigation. He is expected to answer questions submitted by Parliament
members in January 2014. Snowden said in
December 2013 that he was 'inspired by the global debate' ignited by the leaks,
and stated that NSA's 'culture of indiscriminate global espionage "is collapsing". This is true, however in the strict construct
of federal and international law neither Europe, the United States, Snowden,
Assange, or Manning have finished their sentence on espionage - honorable discharge
and compensation. It is evident that the
diplomatic representative who has to determine whether a refugee is to be
granted asylum or not must have the competence to make such a provisional
qualification of any offence alleged to have been committed by the refugee. In
case of disagreement between the two States, a dispute would arise which might
be settled by the methods provided by the Parties for the settlement of their
disputes". The Court considers that
"the Government…has not proved that the acts of which the refugee was
accused…constitute common crimes" and "the grant of asylum is not an
instantaneous açt which terminates with the admission, at a given moment, of a
refugee to an embassy or a legation", but that asylum "is granted as
long as the continued presence of the refugee in the embassy prolongs this
protection" in the Request for the
Interpretation of the Asylum Case Judgment of November 20, 1950. So as not to continue to frighten away free
people afraid of the plagiarism of the black slave owner in the White House the
N.S.A. and United States must drop these espionage and theft of government
property charges and return to Edward Snowden his diplomatic visa pursuant to Snowden v. Hughes, 321 U.S. 1
(1944).
The First Amendment to the US Constitution is one of the world’s
finest instruments of democratic principle, it states, "Congress shall
make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the
right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a
redress of grievances". The
Johannesburg Principles on National Security, Freedom of Expression and Access
to Information, of November 1996 provides at Principle 1:3 the restriction
imposed by the least restrictive means.
Under Principle 6 expression may be punished as a threat to national
security only if it incites violence.
Most importantly in this case Principle 20 provides that any person
accused of a security related crime regarding freedom of expression shall be
entitled to all of the rule of law including the right not to be arbitrarily
detained. Federal whistleblower
protection has failed to protect Snowden from arbitrary arrest for
"espionage". It could be said
that Nelson Mandela died for this sin of his slave owning protégé Barack
Obama. I watched a movie about Nelson
Mandela's life, 'Long Walk to Freedom', in it he, born and raised to be king,
became South Africa's first black lawyer.
He was then corrupted by a 'Treason Trial' which acquitted him and over
a hundred of his compatriots after several years in prison. Thereafter he was entrapt for being 'king'
rather than 'undercover lawyer' of an armed band of black militants with
arsenals believed to be competitive with the average white household. Winnie had an even closer encounter with a
murder conviction and it could be said that Nelson had spare time to serve
her's. After his divorce, he was elected
first black South African President, left office and died at the advanced age
of 95 peacefully. Leaving South Africa
with an HIV/AIDS epidemic that threatens both males and females with the same
50 year life expectancy plaguing the livers of alcoholic Russian males or
hearts of Obamacare aged patients since Human Rights day 2013. The Manning, Assange and Snowden acquittals
or pardons are high time for the United States and Russia pay compensation for
the damages their armed forces have caused the civilian population in
Afghanistan estimated at $4 billion and $10-20 billion respectively, if Russian
males are ever to sober up and help the U.S. Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen (PAY)
as directed in item 7 of Lame Duck Speak
HA-1-1-14 towards the
tables of Empirical US Foreign Assistance
Statistics at the Close of the American Imperial Century: An Act to Secure a Voluntary 1 percent ODA Tax on Income HA-31-9-10.
The
roots of this militarization of U.S. foreign policy lie in the year 1947, with
the beginning of the Cold War. Passage
of the National Security Act of 1947 made the U.S .armed forces an inherent
part of the national security policy in peacetime. Previously, the Pentagon had rarely asserted
itself in the policy process, even in wartime.
The National Security Administration (NSA) was created July 15,
1949. Section 2(A)(4) of HA Book 1
Military Diplomacy (MD) notes that the War Department was renamed Department of Defense
(DoD) due to the corruption of the Secretary of Defense Transfer Order No. 40
of July 22, 1949. Military
influence grew over the next four decades, leading to the Defense
Re-organization Act of 1986, commonly referred to as the Goldwater-Nichols Act,
which made the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff the "principal
military adviser to the President, the National Security Council and Secretary
of Defense" (Goodman '13: 11, 12).
The
2007 dismissal of ACLU v. NSA
HA-6-7-07 by the 6th Circuit
Court of Appeals called for plaintiffs to provide claims for which relief could
be granted whereas the FISA Act provides for a fine of not
more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than five years, or both under 50USC(36)I§1809.
Domestically, the first offense is entitled to appropriate injunctive relief;
and a second or subsequent offense shall be subject to a mandatory $500 civil
fine for the recovery of civil damages under 18USC(119)§2520. Hospitals
and Asylums Battle Mountain Sanitarium Reserve statute likewise provides for a
$1,000 fine and up to 12 months in jail for unlawful intrusion and violation of
the rules and regulations under 24USC(3)V§154. Since
the ACLU first threw their NSA case against my hometown in 2007 the NSA
director was promoted to CIA Director and the term Civil Liberties has been
populated by non-respondent federal officers noted in Lame Duck Speak HA-1-1-14. In response to
recent wiretapping complaints of foreign leaders the Obama Administration Review
Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies released 'Liberty and
Security in a Changing World: Report and Recommendation' on 12 December 2013.
Or should I say "plagiarized" both Edward Snowden and Larry Klayman, founder, chairman and
general counsel of Freedom Watch and also a former U.S. Justice Department
prosecutor, who petitioned the Honorable Richard J. Leon of the U.S. District
Court for the District of Columbia and was granted his motion for preliminary
injunction against the federal government and the National Security Agency
("NSA"), enjoining the NSA from collecting telephone and other
metadata, finding that the program violates the U.S. Constitution in Klayman v. Obama (Nos. 13-cv-851 & 13-cv-881). Judge
Pauley’s ruling shortly thereafter denied the ACLU's motion for a
preliminary injunction and granted the government’s motion to dismiss the
challenge to the constitutionality of the NSA’s mass call-tracking program,
finding that the government’s bulk collection of phone records is lawful under
Section 215 of the Patriot Act and under the Fourth Amendment ACLU v. Clapper (13 Civ. 3994). Having ruled out the National Security
Administration (NSA) as being the original hacker of the San Francisco Conference April 25, 1945 to June 26, 1945 and enacted October 24, 1945 that created the Generals of the
United Nations (GUN) in the stead of a popularly elected Secretary of the
United Nations (SUN); For
the historical record NSA is requested to posit their deposition on whether or
not their agency was responsible for the original hacking of; (1) the
Department of Defense (DoD) in the Secretary of Defense Transfer Order No. 40 of July 22, 1949
that needs to be renamed Military Department (MD), (2) Title 22 of the United States Code Foreign Relations and
Intercourse (a-FRaI-d) that should read Title 22 US Code Foreign relations
(FR-ee), (3) the Court of International Trade of the United States (COITUS)
created in the Customs Court Act of 1980 that must be renamed Customs Court
(CC)? Or is it true, Congress would be
better off DoD than without ACLU?
Snowden and Manning are American heroes. Everyone knows this. But few people dare to challenge Big Brother
to throw out these recent Espionage charges presumably, because like my records
on this issue of Asylum have been incessantly tampered. 'Liberty and Security in a Changing
World' recommends that the NSA be transformed into a civilian agency. It may be necessary for this to occur before
the NSA writes the Department of Justice to ask that the United States drop
charges against Edward Snowden in particular and Bradley Manning in general to
express their understanding that espionage as used by the USA in both Snowden
and Manning cases violated Principle 20 of the Johannesburg
Principles on National Security, Freedom of Expression and Access to
Information, of November 1996 providing that any person accused of a security
related crime regarding freedom of expression shall be entitled to all of the
rule of law including the right not to be arbitrarily detained. This seems like an educated time to redress
the impairment of the black slave owner in the White House's judgment (1)
acquitting the 14 year sentence of his former master, Rod Blagojevich, for a
crime which he did not commit and (2) abolishing the Office of the Intellectual
Property Enforcement Coordinator that infringes on the White House Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) as forced labor under the Slavery Convention to
eliminate the insider threat.
Intellectual property enforcement is similarly rife with arbitrary
detention regarding trade secrets that might be termed corporate espionage
regarding secret information that they had access to in the course of their
employment. European justice is far
colder if record low temperatures of December 2013 are to include
"cooling" in the list of global warming that can be caused by styrene
- earthquake fracker, intensifier of hurricanes and tornadoes and continent
cooler. Obligation to Negotiate Access to the Pacific Ocean (Bolivia/Chile)
ICJ 2013. My personal experiment in mole removal with over-the-counter propane
based liquid nitrogen substitute is not yet over but doesn't seem likely to
succeed; when I run out I'll try trichloracetic acid. What I am getting is that under Principle 20
Johannesburg Principles on National Security, Freedom of Expression and Access
to Information, of November 1996 the Proper treatment of Espionage is honorable
discharge, and neither Europe nor myself got it right the first time with Wikileaks: Honorable Discharge of Bradley Manning HA-31-1-12. I therefore reiterate; the proper treatment
of Espionage is honorable discharge.
A series of laws known collectively as the Alien
and Sedition acts were passed by
the Federalist Congress in 1798 and signed into law by President Adams. The Alien Act of July 6, 1798
included new powers to deport foreigners
as well as making it harder for new immigrants to vote. Previously a new
immigrant would have to reside in the United States for five years before
becoming eligible to vote, but a new law raised this to 14 years. In
1797 a treaty with the British had angered Napoleon. President John
Adams sent a delegation but French emissaries, named XYZ, demanded both a bribe
and a loan. Adams decided to publish the correspondence and the
public was outraged. The Federalists then defeated their Democratic
Republican opponents at every turn and intent on using the XYZ affair to
silence the opposition once and for all the Federalists decided to crack down
on immigrant voting rights and in the crisis of 1798, the Federalist Party used
its dominance to pass the Sedition Act in the spring of 1800, with Election Day
in sight, Secretary of State Pickering had already either prosecuted or singled
out many of the President’s chief detractors for sedition charges (Haynes et
al. 06:52; Epps 08:76; Madison 1799). SEC. 2 of the Sedition Act of July
14, 1798 stated, "That if any person
shall write, print, utter or publish, or shall cause or procure to be written,
printed, uttered or published, or shall knowingly and willingly assist or aid
in writing, printing, uttering or publishing any false, scandalous and
malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States, or
either house of the Congress of the United States, or the President of the
United States, with intent to defame the said government, or either house of
the said Congress, or the said President, or to bring them, or either of them,
into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against them, or either or any of
them, the hatred of the good people of the United States, or to stir up
sedition within the United States, or to excite any unlawful combinations
therein, for opposing or resisting any law of the United States, or any act of
the President of the United States, done in pursuance of any such law, or of
the powers in him vested by the constitution of the
United States, or to resist, oppose, or defeat any
such law or act, or to aid, encourage or abet any hostile designs of any
foreign nation against United States, their people or government, then such
person, being thereof convicted before any court of the United States having
jurisdiction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand
dollars, and by imprisonment not exceeding two years".
In response, prominent
Republicans, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, decided to try and arouse
opposition to the new laws in the state legislatures. Acting in
secret, Jefferson drafted a resolution that the Kentucky legislature approved
in November 1798. The Sedition Act, he wrote, was a violation of the
government’s pledge not to infringe on state’s rights, “Whensoever the general
government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritive
and does abridge the freedom of the press, is not law, is altogether void, and
of no force.” The Virginia Senate agreed to the language of Madison’s
resolution, which accused the new laws of exercising a, “power not delegated by
the constitution, but on the contrary, expressly and positively forbidden by
one of the amendments thereto; a power, which more than any other, ought to
produce universal alarm, because it is leveled against that right of freely
examining public characters and measures, and of free communication among the
people thereon, which has ever been justly deemed, the only effectual guardian
of every other right.” Despite their efforts, Jefferson’s and Madison’s
state resolutions in Kentucky and Virginia were not adopted elsewhere (Haynes
et al 06:52). In the famous Virginia
Resolutions of December
28, 1798, the General Assembly of Virginia
resolved that it "doth particularly protest
against the palpable and alarming infractions of the Constitution, in the
two late cases of the "Alien and Sedition Acts" passed at
the last session of Congress; the first of which exercises a power nowhere
delegated to the federal government, and which by uniting legislative and
judicial powers to those of executive, subverts the general principles of free
government". Also archived by
Avalon are a Draft of the Kentucky
Resolution of October
1798 and Kentucky Resolution on the
Alien and Sedition Acts passed December 3, 1799. One of Pickering’s targets was an English born newspaperman named
Thomas Cooper, the editor of a Republican-leaning Pennsylvania
newspaper. In a June 1799 Address to the Readers of the Sunbury and Northumberland Gazzette,
Cooper criticized the Sedition Act by suggesting Americans resist “in the only
justifiable way of opposition under a free government, by discussion in the
first instance, and a change of persons by constitutional election if no other
method will succeed”. President James Adams was
livid. Certain that such talk was a libel against the whole
government, he ordered that Cooper be arrested in April 1800. As a
final election-year flourish, Pickering decided to have him tried in the
nation’s capital during the Presidential campaign. The case received
national attention, and Cooper, defending himself, capitalized on the
opportunity, attacking both the law and the Adams administration. In
the end, his defense became more than a defense before the jury; it was also an
appeal to the American people about whom they should choose to be their next
President. Although Cooper was ultimately found guilty as charged
and sentenced to serve six months in prison, the damage to the Federalists
credibility had been done. Gradually, more and more public officials
realized it was political suicide to express enthusiasm for the
law. In May 1800, Pickering was dismissed from the cabinet and later
that year, Thomas Jefferson was elected the third President of the United
States. One of Jefferson’s first acts in office was to pardon all
persons who had been convicted of sedition and Congress allowed the law to
expire in 1801 (Haynes et al 06:53). Fines levied in its prosecution
were repaid by Act of Congress on the ground that it was unconstitutional.
In determining the
extent of the constitutional protection of the liberty of the press, it has
been generally, if not universally, considered that it is the chief purpose of
the guaranty to prevent prior restraints upon publication. In
the pre-eminent freedom of the press case, New
York Times v. Sullivan 37 U.S. 254 (1964),
Dr. King’s Court held that some kinds of speech and writings, such as
"obscenity”, and "fighting words," are not expression within the
protection of the First Amendment, freedom to discuss public affairs and public
officials is, unquestionably, the kind of speech the First Amendment was
primarily designed to keep within the area of free discussion. A
representative democracy ceases to exist the moment that the public
functionaries are by any means absolved from their responsibility to their
constituents; and this happens whenever the constituent can be restrained in
any manner from speaking, writing, or publishing their opinions upon any public
measure, or upon the conduct of those who may advise or execute
it. An unconditional right to say what one pleases about public
affairs is the minimum guarantee of the First Amendment. The
classical formulation of the principle underlying the First Amendment is that:
"Those who won our independence believed that public discussion is a
political duty; and that this should be a fundamental principle of the American
government. They recognized the risks to which all human institutions are
subject. But they knew that order cannot be secured merely through fear of
punishment for its infraction; that it is hazardous to discourage thought, hope
and imagination; that fear breeds repression; that repression breeds hate; that
hate menaces stable government; that the path of safety lies in the opportunity
to discuss freely supposed grievances and proposed remedies; and that the fitting
remedy for evil counsels is good ones. Believing in the power of reason as
applied through public discussion, they eschewed silence coerced by law - the
argument of force in its worst form. Recognizing the occasional tyrannies of
governing majorities, they amended the Constitution so that free speech (free
press) and assembly should be guaranteed”. Plagiarism is a species of intellectual
fraud. It consists of unauthorized copying that the copier claims
(whether explicitly or implicitly and whether deliberately or carelessly) is
original with him and the claim causes the copier’s audience to behave
otherwise than it would if it knew the truth. The Latin word
plagarias was first used in its modern sense by Roman poet Martial in the first
century AD. A plagarius was someone who stole another’s slave or
enslaved a free person. Student plagiarism may be becoming less and less common
as more and more colleges and universities adopt plagiarism detection software,
such as Turnitin, a product of a company called
iParadigms. Thousands of colleges in the United States and abroad
have acquired licenses, at an annual cost of about 80 cents per student, to use
the program. The program digitizes the student’s paper, uploads it into
the Turnitin database, and searches the Database for matches. Scholars are self-selected into an activity
that requires them to write, they are not indifferent students with writer’s
block. (Posner 07:82, 90). College level
professional non-fiction writing requires the author to cite sources in pursuit
of being cited by others to advance scientific understanding. The problem is however not so much that
people copy their work, there are very few skilled note-takers and professional
writers and even hasty misquotes can be acceptable, if they are well
meant. The problem is that the
publication of meaningful work is plagued by malicious academics, agents,
politicians and prosecutors. To solve
Martial's law it is not plagiarism to free a slave but it is plagiarism to
enslave a free person or steal their property under First Amendment
Privacy Protection 42USC(21A)§2000aa.
The
President's Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies 'Liberty and Security in a Changing World:
Report and Recommendation' of 12 December 2013 Recommendations naming the
N.S.A. include: Recommendation 20 on pg. 33 'We recommend that the US
Government should examine the feasibility of creating software that would allow
the National Security Agency and other intelligence agencies more easily to
conduct targeted information acquisition rather than bulk-data collection.
Recommendation 22 on pg. 34 'We recommend that: (1) the Director of the
National Security Agency should be a Senate-confirmed position; (2) civilians
should be eligible to hold that position; and (3) the President should give
serious consideration to making the next Director of the National Security
Agency a civilian'. Recommendation 23
on pg. 34 'We recommend that the National Security Agency should be clearly
designated as a foreign intelligence organization; missions other than foreign
intelligence collection should generally be reassigned elsewhere. Recommendation 24 on pg. 34 'We recommend
that the head of the military unit, US Cyber Command, and the Director of the
National Security Agency should not be a single official'. Recommendation 25 on pg. 34 'We recommend
that the Information Assurance Directorate—a large component of the National
Security Agency that is not engaged in activities related to foreign
intelligence—should become a separate agency within the Department of Defense,
reporting to the cyber policy element within the Office of the Secretary of
Defense'. The N.S.A. reforms are however
not fair until the United States drops espionage and theft of public property
charges against their whistleblower, whether the N.S.A. is military or
civilian. The responsibility for
fairness in the face of poor European demands for U.S. torture statute to
comply with Arts. 2, 4 and 14 of the Convention against Torture fall squarely
on the shoulders of President Barack Obama, black slave owner of his former
master for a 14 year sentence for a crime he did not commit, Pardon Rod Blagojevich HA-19-1-13
!!! Honorable Discharge of Bradley Manning HA-31-1-12. The proper treatment of 'Espionage' is
honorable discharge.
A Congressional
Holiday against Torture with Pay
To
correct federal torture statute so as to comply with Arts. 2, 4 and 14 of the
Convention against Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment of 1984.
To
Amend Title 22 Foreign Relations and Intercourse (a-FRAI-d) to Title 22 Foreign
Relations (FR-EE).
To
abolish the Court of International Trade of the United States (COITUS) and
create Customs Court (CC).
To
abolish U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) and create a U.S.
Customs and Naturalization Service (USNS).
To
abolish the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and create U.S. Customs.
Be
the federal police finance and Office Intellectual Property Enforcement
Coordinator, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Alcohol, Tobacco and
Firearms (ATF) abolished and employees transferred to the Department of
Commerce, Department of Justice and a new Drug Evaluation Agency (DEA) and
Center for Alcohol, Tobacco and Marijuana (ATM) in the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) under 5USCIIIB(35)I§3503.
When
Congress has agreed to correct these errors they are welcome to return to work
for President Barack Obama this FY2014 re-dedicated to the repeal of the Jim
Crow laws codified in Sections 2-5 of Amendment XIV of 1868 protecting tribal
tax exemptions under Section 1.
.