Hospitals & Asylums
Pulse
Nightclub v. Human Rights Campaign HA-17-1-17
By Anthony J. Sanders
The Actuary attributed integrity to Obergefell
v. Hodges (2015) in the tardy 2015 Annual Report that was not called
for. In 2016 Social Security Matters blog hosted several postings regarding LGBT
people that were rudely received by the public, before and after the Pace nightclub
rampage shooting of June 12, 2016, that was never mentioned. Around January 12, Social Security
Matters engaged
with the FBI to misinform the public in violation of 18USC¤1512 in regards to
the true federal budget, OASDI and SSI accounts in furtherance of a
Judeo-Christian scheme to rob a widow and all the orphans of their social
security benefits. Social Security Matters was the single contact point for the
federal/Microsoft government, but they abused words Ôbudget cutsÕ and after
removing my explanation for the low morale that the Commissioner did not
produce an SSI 2016 annual report, have been hijacked by the FBI who hijacks
the budget processes of the Department of Justice, Congress and WHOMB
non-accountants all in contempt of my accounting directions. sanderstony@live.com was permanently
disabled by the FBI incidental to accusing them of self-incriminating regarding
the state secrecy electoral infringement in a news blog posting. Having
censured Tony Sanders or, more likely, the email address from the SS Matters,
because the FBI is desperately trying to justify their citizenÕs arrests (not
to mention their cut of the forfeitures) because the author is not contactable
by the emails they disrupt (mass murder?) to provide the public misinformation
only I exhibit the capacity to redact. Social Security Matters computer
specialists needs to convict the FBI for two counts of Unauthorized Access to
Stored Information (hacking) under 18USC¤2701. Please take the time to restore
my blog-postings.
US v. Noor Zhi Salman. Grand
Jury Indictment. US District Court Middle District of
Florida. Orlando Division. Case No. 6.17-cr-18-on28, January 12, 2017
The
two count indictment alleges that, from an unknown date, at least April 2016
through and including June 12, 2016 the defendant did knowingly aid and abet
Omar Mateen by (1) providing material support or
resources in violation of 18USC2339A & B (a)(1 & 2) and (2) engage in
misleading conduct toward the Officers of the Fort Pierce, Florida, Police
Department and Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, with the
intent to hinder, delay and prevent the communication of federal law
enforcement officers and judges of the United States of information relating to
the commission and possible commission of a federal offense in order to prevent
them from communicating to agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and
the United States Department of Justice and judges of the United States of
information relating to the attack on June 12, 2016 at the Pulse Night Club, in
Orlando, Florida, in the Middle District of Florida in violation of
18USC¤1512(b)(3). The defendant is ordered to forfeit all assets foreign and
domestic under 18USC981(a)(1)(G) any firearms and ammunition used in the
offense and $30,500 pursuant to 18USC¤924(d) or substitute property under
21USC¤853 and 28USC¤2461(c). The indictment is signed by three assistant US
Attorneys including the chief of the criminal division and the foreman of the grand
jury.
The
arrest by the FBI without the prior signature of a judge is a trial error under
Rule 4 (b, D) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. A federal magistrate
judge is now determining flight risk of the pre-trial detainee before a federal
judge can be found to take the case. Historically, occupying powers have used
collective punishment to retaliate against and deter attacks on their forces by
Resistance movements (e.g. destroying entire towns and villages where such
attacks have occurred). Art. 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention provides No protected person may be punished for an offense
he or she has not personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all
measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited. Pillage is prohibited.
Reprisals against protected persons and their property are prohibited. The
major issue is that the indictment seems to have been pirated/ defrauded by the
FBI before a Judge could issue a federal arrest warrant served by US Marshall
under Rule 4 Fed. Crim. P. In the commission of this false arrest the FBI
infringed on both Jury and Social Security Commissioners to intimidate and
terrorize HA and pillage the fools at Social Security Matters blog and the
widowÕs very questionable inheritance from her deceased husband. I would
furthermore like to accuse the FBI of permanently disrupting my Microsoft live
email when I blogged the truth, the FBI was self-incriminating regarding their
election infringing state secrecy allegations in the press. The FBI arrest needs
to be ruled a trial error. Both Assistant US Attorneys who wrote the Indictment
and FBI are self-incriminating to accuse the defendant with providing
misleading information under 18USC¤1512(b)(3). How ridiculous to think the
defendants have not yet forfeited the arms and ammunition that were used to
commit the offense. It is difficult to judge the fact that the FBI, DEA, OJP
federal grants, ONDCP and US Sentencing Commission must be abolished under the
Slavery Convention of 1926. The FBI must be dismissed with a self-incrimination
conviction under 18USC¤1512 and Art. 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention before
the terrorism trial can start to liberate Congress from the rampage shooter
(PelosiÕs Permanent Select Intelligence Committee, FBI?) in good grace with the
Geneva Conventions. Can the shooterÕs family disgorge the $30,500 inheritance
to the United States without any claims for victim compensation? Does the
family know of any more ISIS finance the US can receive? Do the surviving
victims and the families of those who died in the gay bar shooting and Human
Rights Campaign need compensation under Art. 14 of the Convention against
Torture or do they owe the shooterÕs widow their
compensation under Art. 14 of the Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights? Since 2014 Medicaid has been paying for Hormone
Replacement Therapy (HRT) for Male-To-Female types and penectomies.
Medicaid needs to stop paying for HRT for MTF types and sex change operations
because the estrogen causes a ÒWarfarin dependencyÓ. The FDA has to revise its
policy so that Warfarin dependency is an absolute contraindication for HRT for
MTF types.
HRT
of the MTF type
Since
2014 Medicaid has been paying Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) of the
male-to-female (MTF) type. HRT of the MTF type is a form of hormone therapy and
sex reassignment therapy that is used to change the secondary sexual
characteristics of transgender and transsexual people from masculine (or
androgynous) to feminine. It is one of two types of HRT for transgender and
transsexual people, the other being female-to-male, and is predominantly used
to treat transgender women. The main effects of HRT of the MTF type are as
follows: Breast development and enlargement. Softening and
thinning of the skin. Decreased body hair growth and density. Redistribution of body fat in a feminine pattern. Decreased
muscle mass and strength. Widening of the hips (if epiphyseal closure has not
yet occurred; see below). Decreased acne, skin oiliness, scalp hair loss, and
body odor. Decreased size of the penis, scrotum, testicles,
and prostate. Suppressed or abolished spermatogenesis
and fertility. Decreased semen production/ejaculate volume. Changes in mood, emotionality, and behavior. Decreased sex
drive and incidence of spontaneous erections. Breast, nipple, and areolar
development varies considerably depending on genetics, body composition, age of
HRT initiation, and many other factors. Development can take a couple years to
nearly a decade for some. Its effectiveness remains to be seen.
After
the gay bar shooting, that was the largest rampage
shooting in US history Medicaid coverage for HRT for MTF and sex change
operations must be re-evaluated. The FDA must redetermine
Warfarin dependency be an absolute contraindication for estrogen consumption.
Medicaid must not cater to or pay for gender dysphoria,
to corruptly convince pubertal teenagers whose beard growth might
be reduced, to be sickened by HRT for MTF type therapy, waiting to
believe in breasts no one at the gay bar sees anymore. Medicaid must stop paying
for the new fangled volunteer penectomy and
invagination that revolutionizes the ancient practice of castrating eunuch
slaves that might reduce estrogen needs to such a level they would not need
Warfarin, but would probably not even reduce the dose of this absolute
contraindication for Hippocratic HRT for MTF type use for timely failure to
develop breasts under the Nuremberg Code. Medicaid must stop paying for HRT of
the MTF type puberty corruption propaganda or sex change operations. Medicaid
shall pay for the surgical removal of all extra reproductive organs of XXY, XYY
Kinefelter syndrome transgender and XXX cisgender people and stop catering to the hormonal demands
of their precancerous organs on teenage runaways unless these HRT for MTF type
drugs are proven to improve, rather than harm, the patientsÕ health, and sex
life, worse than a cigarette. Medicaid does not pay for cigarettes.
Absolute
contraindications – those that can cause life-threatening complications,
and in which hormone replacement therapy should never be used – include
histories of estrogen-sensitive cancer (e.g., breast cancer), thrombosis or
embolism (unless the patient receives concurrent anticoagulants), or macroprolactinoma. In such cases, the
patient should be monitored by an oncologist, hematologist or cardiologist, or
neurologist, respectively. Relative contraindications – in which
the benefits of HRT may outweigh the risks, but caution should be used –
include: Liver disease, kidney disease, heart disease, or stroke. Risk factors
for heart disease, such as high cholesterol, diabetes, obesity, or smoking
Family history of breast cancer or thromboembolic disease. Gallbladder disease.
Circulation or clotting conditions, such as peripheral vascular disease,
polycythemia vera, sickle-cell anemia, paroxysmal
nocturnal hemoglobinuria, hyperlipidemia,
hypertension, factor V Leiden, prothrombin mutation, antiphospholipid antibodies, anticardiolipin
antibodies, lupus anticoagulants, plasminogen or fibrinolysis disorders,
protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, or antithrombin
III deficiency. As dosages increase, risks increase as well. Therefore,
patients with relative contraindications may start at low dosages and increase
gradually.
The
most significant cardiovascular risk for transgender women is the
pro-thrombotic effect (increased blood clotting) of estrogens. This manifests
most significantly as an increased risk for thromboembolic disease: deep vein
thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism, which occurs when blood clots from DVT
break off and migrate to the lungs. Symptoms of DVT include pain or swelling of
one leg, especially the calf. Symptoms of pulmonary embolism include chest
pain, shortness of breath, fainting, and heart palpitations, sometimes without
leg pain or swelling. Deep vein thrombosis occurs more frequently in the first
year of treatment with estrogens. The risk is higher with oral estrogens
(particularly ethinylestradiol and conjugated
estrogens) than with injectable, transdermal, implantable, and nasal formulations.
DVT risk also increases with age and in patients who smoke, so many clinicians
advise using the safer estrogen formulations in smokers and patients older than
40. Because the risks of warfarin – which is used to treat blood clots
– in a relatively young and otherwise healthy population are low, while
the risk of adverse physical and psychological outcomes for untreated
transgender patients is high, pro-thrombotic mutations (such as factor V
Leiden, antithrombin III, and protein C or S
deficiency) are not absolute contraindications for hormonal therapy. Warfarin
(Coumadin) is a prescription for unnecessary surgery because necessary drugs
including anesthesia are contraindicated. Surgeons seem to have better luck
prevailing upon transgender HRT consumers to take heparin for a few days before
surgery and/or stop taking HRT because they have breast cancer than medical
doctors attempting to prescribe metronidazole to cure gastroenteritis just like
alcoholics trying to avoid cancer diagnosis. After the gay bar shooting that
was the largest rampage shooting in US history Medicaid must redetermine Warfarin dependency to be an absolute
contraindication.
In
spite of the induction of breast development, HRT in transgender women does not
appear to increase the risk of breast cancer. Only a handful of cases of breast
cancer have ever been described in transgender women. This is in accordance
with research in cisgender men in which gynecomastia has been found not to be associated with an
increased risk of breast cancer. On the other hand, men with KlinefelterÕs syndrome, who have two X chromosomes
(similarly to cisgender women) in addition to hypoandrogenism, hyperestrogenism,
and a very high incidence of gynecomastia (80%), show
a dramatically (20- to 58-fold) increased risk of breast cancer that is between
that of cisgender men and cisgender
women (though closer to that of the latter). The incidences of breast cancer in
normal men (46,XY karyotype), men with KlinefelterÕs
syndrome (47,XXY karyotype), and cisgender women
(46,XX karyotype) are approximately 0.1%, 3%, and 12.5%, respectively. Also of
potential relevance is the case of women with complete androgen insensitivity
syndrome, who are genetically male (i.e., 46,XY karyotype) and have normal and
complete morphological breast development and in fact breast sizes that are on
average larger than those of cisgender women yet,
similarly to cisgender men, appear to have little (or
possibly even no) incidence of breast cancer. The risk of breast cancer in
women with Turner syndrome (45,XO karyotype) also appears to be significantly
decreased, though this may be related to ovarian failure/hypogonadism
rather necessarily than to genetics. Similarly to the case of breast cancer,
prostate cancer is extremely rare in transgender women who have been treated
with HRT for a prolonged period of time. Whereas as many as 70% of men show
prostate cancer by their 80Õs, only a handful of cases of prostate cancer in
transgender women have been reported in the literature. As such, and in accordance
with the fact that androgens are responsible for the development of prostate
cancer, HRT appears to be highly protective against prostate cancer in
transgender women.
The
most common estrogens used in transgender women include estradiol (which is the
predominant natural estrogen in women) and estradiol esters such as estradiol valerate and estradiol cypionate
(which are prodrugs of estradiol). Estrogens may be
administered orally, sublingually, transdermally (via
patch), topically (via gel), by intramuscular or subcutaneous injection, or by
an implant. Dosages are typically reduced after an orchiectomy (removal of the
testes) or sex reassignment surgery.
The
most commonly used antiandrogens in transgender women
are cyproterone acetate, spironolactone, and GnRH analogues. Spironolactone, which is relatively safe
and inexpensive, is the most frequently used antiandrogen
in the United States. Cyproterone acetate, which is
unavailable in the United States, is more commonly used in the rest of the
world. Spironolactone prevents the formation of androgens in the testes (though
not in the adrenal glands) by inhibiting enzymes involved in androgen
production. It is also an androgen receptor antagonist (that is, it prevents
androgens from binding to and activating the androgen receptor). Cyproterone acetate is a powerful antiandrogen
and progestin that suppresses gonadotropin levels (which in turn reduces
androgen levels), blocks androgens from binding to and activating the androgen
receptor, and inhibits enzymes in the androgen biosynthesis pathway. It has
been used as a means of androgen deprivation therapy to treat prostate cancer.
If used long-term in dosages of 150 mg or higher, it can cause liver
damage or failure.
Non-steroidal
antiandrogens used in HRT for transgender women
include flutamide, nilutamide,
and bicalutamide, all three of which are primarily
used in the treatment of prostate cancer. These drugs are pure androgen
receptor antagonists. They do not lower androgen levels; rather, they act
solely by preventing the binding of androgens to the androgen receptor.
However, they do so very strongly, and are highly effective antiandrogens.
Bicalutamide has improved tolerability and safety
profiles relative to cyproterone acetate, as well as to
flutamide and nilutamide,
and has largely replaced the latter two in clinical practice for this reason.
In
both sexes, the hypothalamus produces gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) to stimulate the pituitary gland to produce
luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). This in turn cause the gonads to produce sex steroids such
as androgens and estrogens. In adolescents of either sex with relevant
indicators, GnRH analogues such as goserelin acetate can be used to stop undesired pubertal
changes for a period without inducing any changes toward the sex with which the
patient currently identifies. GnRH agonists work by
initially overstimulating the pituitary gland, then
rapidly desensitizing it to the effects of GnRH.
After an initial surge, over a period of weeks, gonadal androgen production is
greatly reduced. Conversely, GnRH antagonists act by
blocking the action of GnRH in the pituitary gland.
There is considerable controversy over the earliest age at which it is
clinically, morally, and legally safe to use GnRH
analogues, and for how long. The sixth edition of the World Professional
Association for Transgender HealthÕs Standards of Care permit it from Tanner
stage 2 but do not allow the addition of hormones until age 16, which could be
five or more years later. Sex steroids have important functions in addition to
their role in puberty, and some skeletal changes (such as increased height)
that may be considered masculine are not hindered by GnRH
analogues. GnRH analogues are often prescribed to
prevent the reactivation of testicular function when surgeons require the
cessation of estrogens prior to surgery. The high cost of GnRH
analogues is a significant factor in their relative lack of use in transgender
people. However, they are prescribed as standard practice in the United
Kingdom.
Progestogens are not commonly prescribed for transgender women. The most
common progestogens used in transgender women include
progesterone and progestins (synthetic progestogens) like CPA and medroxyprogesterone
acetate (MPA). These drugs are usually taken orally, but may also be
administered by intramuscular injection. Progestogens,
in conjunction with the hormone prolactin, are involved in the maturation of
the lobules, acini, and areola during pregnancy:
mammary structures that estrogen has little to no direct effect on. However,
there is no clinical evidence that progestogens
enhance breast size, shape, or appearance in either transgender women or cisgender women, and one study found no benefit to breast hemicircumference over estrogen alone in a small sample of
transgender women given both an estrogen and an oral progestogen
(usually 10 mg/day medroxyprogesterone acetate).
Anecdotal evidence from transgender women suggests that those who take progesterone
supplements may experience more full breast development, including stage IV on
the Tanner scale (many transgender women do not develop Tanner stage V
breasts).
Umpqua Bank brought my attention to the Umpqua Community College rampage
shooting wherefore the name of this case was changed to Pulse Nightclub v.
Human Rights Campaign for recognition all the way to the US Supreme
Court. My opinion may be edited further this January, with the same date
of media aided dialogue with the skillful victim witness advocacy of the widow
Noor Zhi Salman who must contribute her inheritance
from Omar Mateen for the US Attorney Victim Witness
Specialist (and/or better
offer) to start compensating the surviving victims and families
of the deceased to pay for their public testimony regarding the rampage shooting,
solicitation for further donations and liability of the Warfarin manufacturer
for not being absolutely contraindicated for use with HRT for MTF types.
The business deal is that the widow is due an equal share of the compensation
with the families of deceased victims.
Section 16 Torture Compensation of the Social Security Amendments of January
1, 2017 provides:
a. To amend Torture 18USC¤2340A(a) so 'outside the United States' is removed
so - Whoever commits or attempts to commit torture shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both, and if death results to
any person from conduct prohibited by this subsection, shall be punished by
death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life.
b. To amend Exclusive Remedies 18USC¤2340B so ÔThe State shall ensure in
its legal system that the victim of an act of torture obtains redress and has
an enforceable right to fair and adequate compensation, including the means for
as full rehabilitation as possible. In the event of the death of the victim as
a result of an
act of torture, his dependents shall be entitled to
compensation under
Art. 14 of the Convention against Torture and Other
Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of 26 June 1987Õ.
c. United Nations Compensation Commission rates:
1. People forced to relocate as the result of military action $2,500 -$4,000
for an individual and $5,000-$8,000 for a family;
2. People who suffered serious bodily injury or families reporting a death
as the result of military action are entitled to between $2,500 and $10,000;
3. After being swiftly compensated for relocation, injury or death an individual
may make a claim for damages for personal injury; mental pain and anguish of a
wrongful death; loss of personal property; loss of bank accounts, stocks and
other securities; loss of income; loss of real property; and individual
business losses valued up to $100,000.
4. After receiving compensation for relocation, injury or death an individual
can file a claim valued at more than $100,000 for the loss of real property or
personal business.
5. Claims of corporations, other private legal entities and public sector
enterprises. They include claims for: construction or other contract losses;
losses from the non-payment for goods or services; losses relating to the
destruction or seizure of business assets; loss of profits; and oil sector or
heavy industry losses.
6. Claims filed by Governments and international organizations for losses
incurred in evacuating citizens; providing relief to citizens; damage to
diplomatic premises and loss of, and damage to, other government property; and
damage to the environment.