Hospitals & Asylums   

 

Welcome

Atlas

Litigation

Legislation

Statute

 

State Mental Institution Library Education (SMILE

 

To supplement Chapter 4 Saint Elizabeth’s Hospital. 71 million students were enrolled in the US in the 2016-2017 school year. The US spent 6.2% of its GDP on education in 2014, this remains the second highest rate in the world, due to hyperinflation in higher education. Thanks to State funding, Congress may sustain normal 3.5% of GDP (2014) OECD elementary and secondary education spending, with 3% annual federal spending growth from CR 18. $788 billion total elementary and secondary school funding 2017-2018 divided by 55.7 million pupils equals $14,147 per pupil enrolled in public, charter or private school, excluding 1.7 million children homeschooled. Although 50% recovered from the recession, public K-12 teachers and other school workers have decreased by -135,000 since 2008, while the number of students has risen by 1,419,000 in 2015. Total elementary and secondary enrollment is underestimated to increase 2% between fall 2016 and fall 2026, when enrollment is expected to reach 56.8 million, but continuation of stable 0.4% average annual growth 2012-2016 would increase the population 4% to 57.9 million. State employees, to get better than $200 a month disability, and the rich, to end child poverty by 2020 and all poverty by 2030, must begin paying the full 12.4% OASDI payroll tax, with due process of obsolete Title I of the Social Security Act. 3% annual growth for elementary and secondary school education budget is the way to avoid the higher average cost of Art. 50 of the Fourth Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Times of War of 1949. A Bachelor degree is required to eliminate recidivism for all law enforcement officers, voluntary or mandatory. To reduce unemployment in law school graduates, satisfied with the jury of public defenders, the plan is to include 4-20 week police and correctional academies in the three-year law school curriculum. The cost of higher education in the United States is the second highest in the world, 2.5% of the GDP. 1.5% of GDP higher education spending is considered normal, for the purpose of sustaining normal 5% of GDP education spending. As of 2011, when the US ceased paying UNESCO dues to discrimination against Palestine, the $6,750 average annual loan, is no longer enough to afford the tuition at public institutions, charging an average of $7,380 a year in tuition 2015-2016 up from $6,003 in 2010-2011. Enrollment in higher education has decreased by -7% between 2010 and 2016 from 18.1 million to 16.9 million students. Tuition prices at public universities must be reduced to increase enrollment, and pocket money, without raising the Student loan amount more than 2.7% annually. Congress must exclude [revenues], [student loan savings], [collections], [$100 billion program level] and [mandatory funds for discretionary programs], from the President's budget total under 2USC§661c. Student loans and other federal loan programs open to private investment. University Presidents to invest excessive compensation in student loans with a 20% grant component, including 11.5% default rate. Congress must enact a real 1 cent per dollar subsidy - $1 billion of defaulted student loan forgiveness per year.

 

1st Ed. Aug. 2004, 2nd May 2005 3rd 28 Feb. 2007, 4th 31 July 2007, 5th 20 April 2009, 6th 16 March 2011, 7th 7 March 2013, 8th 7 April 2015, 9th 27 March 2016, 10th 11 April 2017, 11th 20 December 2018

 

1. This chapter supplements Title 24 USC Chapter 4 St. Elizabeth’s Hospital §161-230.  The ceremonial purpose is for the Education Department (ED) to host the graduation of US Customs from the Department of Homeland Security (HS), Military Department (MD) from Department of Defense (DoD) and Public Health Department from Health and Human Services (HHS).  The original Department of Education was created in 1867 to collect information on schools and teaching that would help the States establish effective school systems. President Jimmy Carter signed a law enacted by Congress that created the US Department of Education - the Department of Education. Organization Act P.L 96 -88 on October 17 1979 under 20USC§3401. Its mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.  Ronald Reagan proposed to abolish the Department of Education in the 1980 election, however, by the end of 1982, it was decided that ED would continue to exist. ED's staff of 4,169, is nearly 45% below the 7,528 employees who administered Federal education programs in several different agencies in 1980 when the Department was founded. Signaling his intention to become an education activist, presidential candidate George W. Bush had to lobby to remove a plank calling for the elimination of ED from the 2000 Republican platform. President Donald Trump's proposed education budget cuts must be overturned a second time by a Democratic victory in the midterm elections for the attitude not in accordance with Art. 50 of the Fourth Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Times of War of 1949 and Case Concerning the Factory of Chorzow Permanent Court of Justice A. No. 9 (1927).  In terms of the percentage of the gross domestic product (GDP) spent on education, at 6.2% the United States trailed Canada, Denmark, Iceland, the Republic of Korea and the United Kingdom in 2014. Thanks to the generosity of States, Congress may sustain normal 3.5% of GDP (2014) OECD elementary and secondary education spending, with 3% annual federal spending growth from CR 18. Total elementary and secondary enrollment is underestimated by the National Center for Education Statistics to increase 2% between fall 2016 and fall 2026, when enrollment is expected to reach 56.8 million, but continuation of stable 0.4% average annual growth 2012-2016 would increase the population 4% to 57.9 million, by the end of the same decade. To stabilize federal elementary and secondary school funding to remain competitive and be right, rather than low or high, at current rates of inflation, 3% annual growth for elementary and secondary school education budget is the only way to avoid the higher average cost of disputing Art. 50 of the Fourth Geneva Convention. The cost of higher education in the United States is the second highest in the world, 2.5% of the GDP, even after excluding research funding. 1.5% of GDP higher education spending could be considered normal, for the purpose of sustaining normal 5% of GDP education spending. As of 2011, when the United States ceased paying United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) dues to discrimination against Palestine, the $6,750 annually, for a $27,000 four-year degree, Stafford Student Loans, are no longer enough to afford the tuition at highly subsidized public institutions, that are charging an average of $7,380 a year in tuition 2015-2016 up from $6,003 in 2010-2011. As a consequence, enrollment in higher education in the United States decreased by 7% between 2010 and 2016 (from 18.1 million to 16.9 million students). Furthermore, Congress must exclude [$100 billion] student loan program, revenues, collections, mandatory funds used for discretionary programs in brackets from the mandatory programs subtotal and cease pretending to partially subsidize the deferment of interest while attending an institution 10 cents to the dollar, and actually subsidize 1 cent per dollar, $1 billion of total student loan forgiveness per year.

 

Total Elementary and Secondary Education Spending 2014-2020

 

Level of Funds

2014-15 billions

2014-15 percent

2015-16 billions

2015-16 percent

2016-2017 billions

2016-2017 percent

2017-2018 billions

2017-2018 percent

2018-2019 billions

2018-2019

percent

2019- 2020 billions

2019- 2020 percent

Federal

$57.0

8.2%

$60.0

8.3%

$57.0

7.5%

$57.0

7.2%

58.7

7.2%

60.5

7.2%

State

292.0

42.0

302.0

42.0

327.0

43.0

340.0

43.2%

350.2

43.1

360.7

43.1

Local

284.0

40.8

292.0

40.7

303.0

39.9

316.0

40.1

325.5

40.1

335.2

40.1

All Other

63.0

9.0

64.0

8.9

73.0

9.6

75.0

9.5

77.3

9.5

79.6

9.5

Total

696.0

100.0

718.0

100.0

759.0

100.0

788.0

100.0

811.7

100.0

836

100.0

Source: ED FY 2017 & FY 2019 Budgets Appendix 4 Total Expenditures for Elementary and Secondary Education in the U.S.

 

2. On average, 47% of school revenues in the United States come from state funds. Local governments provide another 45%; the rest comes from the federal government. In response to federal budget cuts states have increased spending from 42% to 43% while federal spending declines from 8% to 7% and local funds from 41% to 40%. Because of the generosity of states, the federal government does not owe arrears for actual damages, provided ED elementary and secondary school spending begins to increase 3% annually CR 18 to CR 19 to sustain local support of 3% economic growth and 0.4% annual enrollment growth, rather than 0.2% anticipated by federal underestimates. Total K-12 federal, state, and local spending for Education, both public and private, climbed from $420 billion for the 2000-2001 school year to $788 billion for the 2018-2019 school year, 4.9% average annual growth. In 2014, the U.S. spent an average of $12,157 per student on elementary and secondary education, over 30% more than the OECD average of $9,419. While the number of public K-12 teachers and other school workers has fallen by 135,000 since 2008, the number of students has risen by 1,419,000 in 2015. After a long time as the second highest education spender, several countries outspent the U.S. on elementary and secondary education, including Austria, Switzerland, Norway and Luxembourg, which spent $21,595 per full-time student in 2014. In the 2017- 2018 school year $788 billion total elementary and secondary school funding divided by 55.7 million pupils equals $14,147 per pupil enrolled public, private or charter school, excluding 1.7 million children homeschooled. Total elementary and secondary enrollment is underestimated by the National Center for Education Statistics to increase 2% between fall 2016 and fall 2026, when enrollment is expected to reach 56.8 million, but continuation of stable 0.4% average annual growth 2012-2016 would increase the population 4% to 57.9 million, by the end of the same decade. Thanks to the generosity of States, Congress may sustain normal 3.5% of GDP (2014) OECD elementary and secondary education spending, with 3% annual federal spending growth from CR 18.  States cut K-12 funding as a result of the 2007-09 recession. Most states cut school funding after the recession hit, and it took years for states to restore their funding to pre-recession levels. Local funding still hadn’t fully recovered in 2015, leaving total state and local K-12 funding per student still well below pre-recession levels as of that school year. School districts began cutting teachers and other employees in mid-2008 when the first round of budget cuts took effect. By mid-2012, local school districts had cut 351,000 jobs. Since then some of the jobs have been restored, but the number is still down 135,000 jobs compared with 2008. States are highly recommended to contribute either the unadjusted 1.8% DI and 10.6% OASI or 2.1% DI 10.3% OASI adjusted rate of their payroll to ensure state workers, including former workers under retirement age, receive at least $200 more than federal disability insurance benefits every month under Titles I and II of the Social Security Act. While the number of public K-12 teachers and other school workers has fallen by 135,000 since 2008, the number of students has risen by 1,419,000 in 2015. Average class size has increased from 1:16 to 1:20. 3.5% of GDP elementary and secondary school spending is the OECD average and no defense of the extra costs of school buses and American football is needed. Education stabilizes at 3% economic growth. Provided that CR 19 is 3% more than CR 18, and CR 20 3% more than CR 19, there should be no need for the federal government to pay education any arrears under Art. 19 of the United Nations Charter, but those due UNESCO and Palestine under Art. 50 and 147 of the Fourth Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in the Times of War of 1949.

 

Higher Education Spending Total 2011-2016

(millions)

 

2011-2012

2012-2013

2013-2014

2014-2015

2015-2016

Public Institutions

317,289

327,934

353,100

346,813

364,391

Private Non-Profit

161,843

202,042

228,807

200,396

182,575

Private For-Profit

26,923

24,762

22,646

19,666

17,059

Total, Higher Education

506,055

554,738

604,553

566,875

564,025

Source: National Center for Education Statistics


3. The cost of higher education in the United States is the second highest in the world, 2.5% of the GDP, even after excluding research funding. 1.5% of GDP higher education spending could be considered normal. Enrollment in higher education in the United States decreased by 7% between 2010 and 2016 (from 18.1 million to 16.9 million students). The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) projects undergraduate enrollment to increase by 3% (from 16.9 million to 17.4 million students) between 2016 and 2027 without justifying a reversal in trends. After peaking in 2010, enrollment at private for-profit institutions decreased by -47% (from 1.7 million to 915,000 students) between 2010 and 2016. During this period, enrollment at public institutions decreased by -4% (from 13.7 million to 13.1 million students), while enrollment at private nonprofit institutions increased by 6% (from 2.7 million to 2.8 million students). The reason for the decline in higher education enrollment is because that at a maximum of $6,750 annually, for a $27,000 four-year degree, Stafford Student Loans, are no longer enough to afford the tuition at highly subsidized public institutions, that are charging an average of $7,380 a year in tuition 2015-2016 up from $6,003 in 2010-2011. Student loans are no longer enough for public institution tuition, but public institutions cost less than either private-for-profit colleges despite a reduction in tuition 2015-2016 or high priced private-non-profit universities. Between 2010–11 and 2015–16, revenues from tuition and fees per full-time-equivalent (FTE) student increased by 23%, 4.6% average annual rate, at public institutions (from $6,003 to $7,380 in constant 2016–17 dollars) and by 7%, 1.4% average annual rate, at private nonprofit institutions (from $20,071 to $21,394). At private for-profit institutions, revenues from tuition and fees per FTE student were -5%, -1% average annual rate, lower in 2015–16 than in 2010–11 ($15,806 vs. $16,698).
 Tuition at public institutions must go down to a level below the average $6,750 (2018) Stafford Loan limit, if either federal subsidies or enrollment in higher education, can be expected to increase. To be fair the Stafford student loan limit must increase 3% annually. Revenues per FTE student from government sources were 32% lower in 2015–16 ($783) than in 2010–11 ($1,155) at private for-profit institutions and 14% lower in 2015–16 ($7,600) than in 2010–11 ($8,849) at private nonprofit institutions. At public institutions, revenues per FTE student from government sources were similar in 2015–16 ($14,959) and in 2010–11 ($14,926). For $12,000 + 3% annual growth per capita subsidy from the federal, state and local governments private-for-profit universities could theoretically charge undergraduate students tuition $5,000 a year, that could be afforded with the current $6,750 annual Stafford student loan. Congress must stabilize the education budget by excluding [student loans savings, revenues, collections and mandatory funds used for discretionary programs in brackets] from the President's budget beginning FY 17 under 2USC§661c. Congress may abolish the 10 cent per dollar student loan subsidy by limiting new loans to receipts. For student loan and other lending programs, authorized by Congress and administered by the Treasury, to avoid distorting the budget, the plan is to open the 11% student loan default rate of the current statutory $100 billion federal limit on new federal student loans to private investment, including the excessive compensation of some university presidents, in student loans with a 20% grant component, aiming to reduce the price of tuition.

 

Federal Education Department, Total Outlays FY 17 – FY 20

(millions)

 

Program

FY 17

FY 18 request

FY 18 CR

FY 18 3%

FY 19 request

FY 19 3%

FY 20 3%

Total Outlays

73,900

78,941

73,942

76,117

67,582

78,188

80,534

Discretionary Outlays

68,066

62,889

67,890

70,108

61,439

71,999

74,159

Total Mandatory Outlays

5,834

6,052

6,052

6,009

6,143

6,189

6,375

Total Outlays

73,900

78,941

73,942

76,117

67,582

78,188

80,534

Advance Appropriations

(22,444)

(22,597)

(22,597)

(22,597)

(22,597)

(24,024)

(24,624)

Source: Education Department Budget FY 17, FY 18 & F Y19; Gonzalez, Heather B.; Tollestrup, Jessica. Department of Education Funding: Key Concepts and FAQ. Congressional Research Service. April 22, 2016. Advance Appropriations = Undistributed Offsetting Receipts.

 

4. Key programs administered by the Department include Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), for which the Department’s fiscal year 2019 request would provide $15.5 billion to help approximately 25 million students in high-poverty schools make progress toward State academic standards; and $12 billion for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Part B Grants to States to help States and school districts meet the special education needs of 6.9 million students with disabilities. Key programs also include Federal Pell Grants, which would make available $30.2 billion in need-based grants to 7.6 million students enrolled in postsecondary institutions; and the postsecondary student loan programs, which would help provide roughly $151 billion in new and consolidated Direct Loans to help students and families pay for college. CR 18 has redressed most of the President's attempted budget cuts without fully funding the 3% education spending growth rule. To compensate agencies for having to defend themselves against unwarranted budget cuts FY 18 and FY 19 budgets are re-estimated at 3% growth from FY 17.  3% annual growth in education spending is the rule.  ED must do seven things. (a) Sustain 3.5% of GDP elementary and secondary education spending with 3% annual spending growth from CR 18. (b) Bankroll teachers and other contributors to state retirement programs under Title I to pay social security disability insurance under Title II of the Social Security Act so that they and the rich would contribute 12.4% of their income to the OASDI payroll tax. $200 a month basic disability discriminates against underinsured state employees due a disability commensurate with their payroll tax contribution. (c) Require that academy trained officers attain at least a Bachelor degree for employment as law enforcement and corrections officers. (d) Ensure the State Department compensates $1 billion to the United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) for $550 million arrears since 2011 and $85.7 million dues, 3% annual growth therefrom, and $450 million program level for Palestine UN Relief and Works Administration (UNRWA) under Art. 19 of the UN Charter FY 19. (e) Exclude [revenues], [student loan savings], [$100 billion program level] and [mandatory funds for discretionary programs], in brackets from the President's budget, to comply with the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 under 2USC§661c. (f) Open student loans to private investment and direct university Presidents to invest excessive compensation in student loans with a 20% grant component to secure private investment, to sustain [$100 billion federal student loan program level]. (g) Reduce tuition prices at public universities to increase enrollment, and pocket money, without raising the Student loan amount more than 2.7% annually.Congress must do four things, one of which is to amend three laws that bait enforcement to sustain the high male librarian and patron crime victimization rate. (a) Exclude [revenues], [student loan savings], [collections], [$100 billion program level] and [mandatory funds for discretionary programs], from the President's budget total under 2USC§661c. (b) Open student loans and other federal loan programs open to private investment in student loans beginning with the excessive compensation of University Presidents, with a 20% grant component, including the 11.5% default rate. (c) Cease to sustain the historical belief that the interest deferment on Stafford Subsidized Loan is a 10 cent per dollar subsidy and enact a real 1 cent per dollar subsidy - $1 billion of defaulted student loan forgiveness per year. (d) Repeal the word 'enforcement' from (i) the caption of Part 1200 so that it states, Nondiscrimination on the basis of Handicap in programs or activities conducted by the National Council on Disability under 34CFR§1200.170, (ii) 'enforcement of Section 111' at 20USC§112 needs to be repealed and (iii) replace General Definitions at 20USC§9101(1) with (1) No stalking in the library 18USC§2261A(2) to enable public and college library wifi to download music and movies, including pornography, while blocking these sites from elementary and secondary schools, until there is an age appropriate movie download site. Public and college libraries are highly encouraged to discourage unauthorized access to computers by using anonymous encrypted wifi that cannot be used for desktop or GPS surveillance.

 

Education Department, Discretionary Budget FY 17 – FY 20

(thousands)

 

FY 17

CR 18

FY 18

3%

FY 19 President's Budget

FY 19

3%

FY 20

3%

Total, Discretionary Appropriation

68,065,700

67,889,967

70,107,710

61,439,322

71,998,845

74,158,630

Elementary and Secondary Education (ESEA)

Title I Grants to local educational agencies

15,366,180

15,428,437

15,827,165

15,459,802

16,301,980

16,791,040

Opportunity Grants (proposed legislation)

0

0

0

500,000

0

0

Education innovation and research

100,000

99,320

103,000

180,000

106,000

109,000

Supporting Effective Educator Development (SEED)

65,000

64,559

66,950

0

68,959

71,027

State assessments

369,100

366,593

380,173

369,100

391,578

403,325

Student support and academic enrichment grans (Title IV-A)

400,000

397,284

412,000

0

424,360

437,091

Supporting effective instruction State grants (Title II)

2,044,411

2,053,287

2,105,743

0

2,168,916

2,233,983

Teacher and school leaders incentive grants

200,0000

198,642

206,000

0

212

219

School leader recruitment and support

14,500

14,402

14,935

0

15,382

15,845

Charter schools

342,172

339,848

352,437

500,000

363,010

373,901

Magnet schools assistance

97,647

96,984

100,576

97,647

103,594

106,702

Promise Neighborhoods

73,254

72,757

75,452

0

77,715

80,047

School safety national activities

68,000

67,538

70,040

43,000

72,141

74,305

21st century (after school) community learning centers

1,191,673

1,183,580

1,227,423

0

1,264,246

1,302,173

English language acquisition

737,400

732,392

759,522

737,400

782,308

805,777

Impact aid

1,328,603

1,319,581

1,368,461

734,557

1,409,515

1,451,800

Other ESEA Programs

1,124,250

1,116,615

1,157,978

763,144

1,192,717

1,228,498

Subtotal ESEA

23,542,190

23,551,819

24,227,855

19,384,650

24,742,633

25,484,733

Special Education (IDEA)

Grants to States (Part B)

11,939,805

11,984,380

12,297,999

12,002,846

12,666,939

13,046,947

Preschool Grants and Grants for infant and families

826,794

821,179

851,598

826,794

877,146

903,460

Other IDEA programs

222,133

220,624

228,797

222,133

235,661

242,731

Subtotal, IDEA

12,988,732

13,026,183

13,378,394

13,051,775

13,779,746

14,193,138

Subtotal, ESEA and IDEA

36,530,922

36,578,002

37,606,249

32,436,425

38,522,379

39,677,871

Career and technical education

1,119,647

1,122,751

1,153,236

1,137,598

1,187,834

1,223,469

Other P-12 programs

232,911

231,329

239,898

170,328

247,095

254,508

Subtotal, Elementary/Secondary Education

37,883,480

37,932,082

38,999,383

33,744,351

39,957,308

41,155,848

Postsecondary Education

Federal Pell grants (discretionary only)

22,475,352

22,322,722

23,149,613

22,475,352

23,844,101

24,559,424

Other student financial assistance programs

1,722,858

1,711,158

1,774,544

200,000

1,827,780

1,882,614

Consolidated MSI Grant (proposed legislation

0

0

0

147,906

0

0

TRIO

950,000

943,549

978,500

550,000

1,007,855

1,038,091

Other postsecondary education programs

1,518,551

1,508,237

1,564,108

801,054

1,611,031

1,659,362

Subtotal, Postsecondary Education

26,666,761

26,485,666

27,466,765

24,174,312

28,290,767

29,139,491

Adult Education

595,667

591,622

613,537

499,561

631,943

650,901

Research, development and dissemination

187,500

186,227

193,125

187,500

198,919

204,886

Statistics

109,500

108,756

112,785

112,500

116,169

119,654

National Assessment of Education Progress

149,000

108,756

153,470

112,500

158,074

162,816

Statewide longitudinal data systems

32,281

32,062

33,249

0

34,247

35,274

Departmental management (SSA, Program Admin, OCR, OIG)

2,176,610

2,161,829

2,241,908

2,402,113

2,309,166

2,378,441

Other programs and activities

284,901

282,967

293,488

206,487

302,252

311,319

Subtotal, Other Discretionary

3,535,459

3,472,219

3,641,562

3,520,661

3,750,770

3,83,291

Total, Discretionary Appropriation

68,065,700

67,889,967

70,107,710

61,439,322

71,998,845

74,158,630

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: Source: ED FY 19

 

5. Most of the Department’s 120-plus programs are funded through discretionary appropriation acts enacted each fiscal year. However, there are many education programs—some of them large—that are funded directly through their authorizing statutes. For many budgeting purposes, these programs are classified as mandatory. The Direct Loan program is the largest mandatory program in the Department. The Direct Loan program will make an estimated $115 billion in loans to postsecondary students and their families in fiscal year 2012. However, the appropriation for these loans is not $115 billion. Instead, under the Credit Reform Act, the appropriation is the amount necessary to subsidize the loan volume for the life of the cohort of loans made in the fiscal year, and the subsidy costs are discounted using a net present value calculation. In 2012, these subsidy costs include the Government’s cost of obtaining $115 billion, the cost to defray the in-school interest for needy undergraduates, an allowance for defaults, and other factors. These are offset by collections of fees, interest, and principal repayments. In some years, after reflecting the time value of money, or the “re-estimate,” of prior year loans required by the Credit Reform Act, the estimated receipts exceed the cost of the subsidizing the loans. When added together with other mandatory programs, the negative appropriations from the estimated receipts for student loans produce Department totals that appear to understate the annual appropriations for discretionary and mandatory programs. For example, in 2011 and 2013, the mandatory appropriation total for the Department is projected to be negative. The 2012 appropriation would also be negative except that the budget assumes enactment of the American Jobs Act. Under this proposal, the Department would receive $61.6 billion in mandatory funds in 2012. Other mandatory programs include Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants, a portion of Pell Grants, and a variety of smaller programs and activities. The mandatory funding for Pell Grants comes from several laws, including SAFRA, the Budget Control Act of 2011, and appropriation acts. Some of the mandatory Pell Grant funding is specified in these laws, and some fluctuates based on inflation and program participation. Fascination with the Pell Grant only serves to distract decision-makers from amortizing student loans so that it would be possible to make an accurate estimate regarding the next fiscal year.  To stabilize the education budget the President and Congress must agree to exclude student loan subsidies and revenues. Congress may abolish the 10 cent per dollar student loan subsidy by limiting new loans to receipts. For student loan and other lending programs, authorized by Congress and administered by the Treasury, to avoid distorting the budget, the plan is to open the 11% student loan default rate of the current statutory $100 billion federal limit on new federal student loans to private investment, including the excessive compensation of some university presidents, in student loans with a 20% grant component, aiming to reduce the price of tuition. To be fair Congress must untie their subsidy from interest deferment of the subsidized Stafford Loan. The practice of interest deferment should be continued at current rates of individual loan portfolio diversification as a matter of honor. To redress decades of misunderstanding of negative subsidies Congress must diversify their massive subsidies into meaningful lump sum student loan repayment process for witnesses of moral hazards to a lengthy repayment process. Congress is encouraged to abolish all subsidies for the federal direct student loan program by opening the $100 billion new loan level with 6.6% average annual interest rate, 11.5% default rate and 20% total grant component authorized to private investment under 2USC§661c. Several billion dollars could surely be secured by Act of Congress, from the excessive compensation of university presidents, for the initial public offering of Federal Student Aid (FSA) to investors pleased with the 20% grant, collections and default component and modest interest income they might earn from student loans. To do decades of accounting errors regarding negative subsidies justice the ED budget is advised amortize the student loan subsidy at $1 billion annually, 1 cent rather than 10 cents, to the dollar subsidy, slightly more than the initial offer of zero, to be spent on total loan forgiveness, to guarantee the profit margin of the [$100 billion] federal student loan program for private investors.

 

 

Education Department, Mandatory Budget FY 17 – FY 20

(thousands)

 

Mandatory Programs

FY 17

CR 18

FY 18 3%

FY 19

FY 19 3%

FY 20

Rehabilitative Services

Vocational rehabilitation State grants

Grants to States

3,121,054

3,184,849

3,214,686

3,478,238

3,311,126

3,410,460

Grants to Indians

43,000

40,189

44,290

43,752

45,619

46,987

Subtotal, Rehabilitative Services

3,164,054

3,225,038

3,258,976

3,521,990

3,356,745

3,457,477

Higher Education

Aid for institutional development

144,305

144,770

148,634

155,000

153,093

157,686

Aid for Hispanic-serving institutions

93,100

93,400

95,893

100,000

98,770

101,732

Subtotal, Higher Education

237,405

238,170

244,527

255,000

251,863

259,418

Other Mandatory Accounts

Contributions

301

171

310

0

319

329

Higher education facilities loan accounts

199,397

37,778

0

(1,767)

0

0

Other Mandatory Accounts, Subtotal

199,698

37,949

310

-1,767

319

329

Federal Student Aid (FSA)

Federal Pell grants:

Mandatory Pell grants

5,680,400

5,977,000

5,850,812

6,103,000

6,026,336

6,207,127

Mandatory funding for discretionary program costs

[(1,320,000)]

[(1,382,000)]

[(1,360,000)]

[(1,383,000)]

[(1,400,388)]

[(1,442,400)]

Subtotal Pell Grants

[7,000,400]

[7,359,000]

[7,210,812]

[7,486,000]

[7,426,724]

[7,649,527]

Iraq and Afghanistan Service rants

401

463

413

0

0

0

TEACH Grants

153,342

74,947

157,942

39,931

162,681

167,561

Subtotal, Grants Outlays

5,834,143

6,052,410

6,009,167

6,142,9321

6,189,017

6,374,688

Subtotal, Grants BA

[7,154,143]

[7,434,410]

[7,369,167]

[7,525,931]

[7,589,405]

[7,817,088]

Student financial assistance debt collection

7,966

8,557

8,557

8,557

8,771

8,990

Total Mandatory Outlays

5,834,143

6,052,410

6,009,167

6,142,931

6,189,017

6,374,688

Student Loan Program Level

[100,000,000]

[100,000,000]

[100,000,000]

[100,000,000]

[100,000,000]

[100,000,000]

New Loans

[87,000]

[88,700]

[88,700]

[90,500]

[90,500]

[92,300]

Repayments

[67,100,00]

[69,800,000]

[69,800,000]

[72,900,000]

[72,900,000]

[76,200,000]

Federal Direct Student Loans Program Account Savings

[45,538,407]

[13,260,980]

[13,260,980]

[5,624,786]

0

0

Federal Family Education Loans Program Account

[11,155,845]

[2,545,960]

0

0

0

0

Federal Family Education Loans Liquidating Account

[(159,804)]

[(212,095)]

0

[(186,626)]

0

0

Health Education Assistance Loans Liquidating Account

[(1,718)]

[(2,000)]

0

[(2,000)]

0

0

Subtotal, FSA BA

[63,686,873]

[23,027,255]

[7,369,167]

[12,962,091]

[7,589,830

7,817,526

General fund receipts (mostly student loans)

[19,493,310]

[27,229,280]

[27,229,280]

[14,190,586]

[14,190,586]

0

Net Mandatory BA

[47,802,686]

[(692,311)]

[10,872,980]

[2,555,285]

[11,207,528]

[11,543,710]

Mandatory Outlays No Loans or

Revenues

5,834,143

6,052,410

6,009,167

6,142,931

6,189,017

6,374,688

Source: ED FY 19

6. Federal Student Aid (FSA’s) accounting for its loan and loan guarantees is based on the requirements of the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (FCRA). FCRA has been misinterpreted to estimate a subsidy cost using the net present value of future cash flows to and from FSA. In accordance with FSA's misinterpretation of FCRA, credit programs either estimate a subsidy cost to the government (a “positive” subsidy), breakeven (zero subsidy cost), or estimate a negative subsidy cost. The President's budget is responsible for reflecting on program level and cost. Program level must be presented in brackets, so that it does not add to total outlays, because it is primarily funded by interest on loan repayments. Cost requires indication as to whether or not Congress has decided if cost is to born by program revenues or the General Fund, under 2USC§661c. FSA borrows from Treasury to provide funding for credit programs for higher education and subsidies are described as liabilities. FSA borrowed nearly every penny they lent from the Treasury. As of September 30, 2017, FSA had a net Fund Balance of about $42.6 billion with the Treasury amounting to $74.0 billion of which about 42% or $31.4 billion represented general funds, including funds provided in advance by multiyear appropriations, that must be repaid, as if they had never occurred. FSA under-reports loan payments from borrowers ($62.6 billion), loan discharges ($4.5 billion), and other adjustments, $67.1. billion revenues FY 17 on pg. 33. New loans were estimated to cost $94 billion ED FY 17 , but about 7% of new loans don't go through, $87 billion expenses, $67.1 billion revenues and $42.6 billion in savings, for an estimated $23 billion Fund Balance year end September 30, 2018.  The Department of Education operates two major student loan programs—the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) program and the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan (Direct Loan) program—but since July 1, 2010, the Department has made new loans only through the Direct Loan program. Outstanding student loan portfolio was $210 billion for FFEL, $63 billion for ECASLA, and $999 billion for Direct Loans FY 18. Stafford Loans are subsidized, low-interest loans based on financial need. The Federal Government pays the interest while the student is in school and during certain grace and deferment periods. Both students and institutions have become dependent on student loans as a core source of funding for postsecondary education. In 2013-14, student budgets included at least $112 billion in loans. More than 90% of these were from federal loan programs, including: $27 billion in subsidized low-interest loans for undergraduates (the government pays the interest while students remain enrolled); $56 billion in unsubsidized low-interest loans for both graduate students and undergraduates (also low-interest, but the interest accrues while students are enrolled); and $10 billion in higher-interest Parent PLUS loans, $8 billion in higher-interest graduate “PLUS” loans, and $1 billion in Perkins loans, which are now being phased out. In addition, students borrowed $9 billion in privately-sourced loans and less than a billion in state- supported loans. This does not include other debt students or families may have taken out through credit cards, mortgages, or personal loans that were used directly or indirectly to fund higher education expenses. In the short-term, student loans are a source of federal funding for students and, indirectly, for institutions. But in the long-term, they do not shift the burden of payment away from students. There is considerable debate about the share that will ultimately be borne by taxpayers, and the estimates vary depending on accounting assumptions. The most recent Congressional Budget Office estimate, in 2017, for example, is that the federal government will end up spending approximately 10 cents for every dollar loaned. In 2014, only approximately 29% of outstanding student loans were current with declining balances. Another 11% were in default status and 34% were current but with increasing balances. During FY 2017, FSA saw a slight increase in the portfolio’s three-year default rate, from 11.3% reported in FY 2016 for the FY 2013 three- year cohort default rate to 11.5% reported in FY 2017 for the FY 2014 three-year cohort default rate. FSA also increased its collection rate from $53.07 to $59.69.  The plan is to open the Federal Student Loan Program to private investment with a 20% grant component, covering the 11.5% default rate, beginning with excessive compensation for university Presidents. Congress is advised to stop pretending to pay a 10 cent on the dollar subsidy for [$100 billion student loans] and really make the President’s budget pay a $1 billion annual fund for the President’s budget to repay defaulted student loan forgiveness for the President’s budget.

 

Prototype Student Loan Budget Without Investment FY 17 – FY 20

(billions)

 

FY 17

FY 18

FY 19

FY 19

FY 20

FY 19

Revenues

67.1

69.8

72.9

72.9

76.2

76.2

New Loans

87.0

88.7

90.5

72.9

92.3

76.2

Change

-19.9

-18.9

-17.6

0

-16.1

0

Fund Balance

42.6

22.7

3.8

3.8

-13.8

3.8

Source: Johnson, Wayne; Hurt Jay. Federal Student Aid FY 17 Annual Report

 

7. The new fixed interest rates are 5.045% on the Federal Stafford loan for undergraduate students, 6.595% for the Federal Stafford loan for graduate students and 7.595% for the Federal Grad PLUS and Federal Parent PLUS loans as of July 1, 2018. Parents are fully responsible for paying PLUS loans, if they are taken out to benefit students, and not to pay for graduate or professional education. Perkins Loans had a fixed interest rate of 5%. for undergraduate and graduate students with exceptional financial need. It is important to note that under federal law, the authority for schools to make new Perkins Loans ended on Sept. 30, 2017, and final disbursements were permitted through June 30, 2018. As a result, students can no longer receive Perkins Loans. Private investors must somehow be convinced that 6.6% average annual interest rates affords the 11% - 12% default rate. The interest rate factor is used to calculate the amount of interest that accrues on your loan. It is determined by dividing your loan's interest rate by the number of days in the year. Simple daily interest formula: Interest Amount = (Outstanding Principal Balance x Interest Rate Factor) x Number of Days Since Last Payment. Unpaid interest is generally capitalized following periods of deferment on an unsubsidized loan and/or forbearance of interest on subsidized student loans while they are enrolled in college. The First-Year Undergraduate Annual Loan Limit is $5,500—No more than $3,500 of this amount may be in subsidized loans. Independent Student and dependent undergraduate students whose parents are unable to obtain PLUS Loans the limit is $9,500—No more than $3,500 of this amount may be in subsidized loans. Second-Year Undergraduate Annual Loan Limit is $6,500—No more than $4,500 of this amount may be in subsidized loans. Independent students have a $10,500 limit —No more than $4,500 of this amount may be in subsidized loans. Third-Year and Beyond Undergraduate Annual Loan Limit is $7,500—No more than $5,500 of this amount may be in subsidized loans. Independent students may get up to $12,500—No more than $5,500 of this amount may be in subsidized loans. All graduate and professional students are considered independent with a limit of $20,500 (unsubsidized only). The Subsidized and Unsubsidized Aggregate Loan Limit is $31,000—No more than $23,000 of this amount may be in subsidized loans. $57,500 for undergraduates—No more than $23,000 of this amount may be in subsidized loans. $138,500 for graduate or professional students—No more than $65,500 of this amount may be in subsidized loans. The graduate aggregate limit includes all federal loans received for undergraduate study.  Among post-baccalaureate certificate completers in 2015–16 who had student loans, the average balance was higher for those who attended private for-profit institutions ($97,300) than for those who attended public institutions ($51,100), but neither was measurably different from the average balance for those who attended private nonprofit institutions ($81,500). Among master’s degree completers who had student loans, the average balance was higher for those who attended private for-profit institutions ($90,300) than for those who attended private nonprofit institutions ($71,900), and both were higher than the average balance for those who attended public institutions ($54,500). For students who completed a research doctorate and had student loans, the average balance was higher for those who attended private for-profit institutions ($160,100) than for those who attended private nonprofit ($94,100) and public ($92,200) institutions. For students who completed a professional doctorate and had student loans, the average balances for those who attended private nonprofit ($221,800) and private for-profit ($190,200) institutions were not measurably different, but both were higher than the average student loan balance for those who attended public institutions ($142,600). Average loan balances for students who completed a research or professional doctorate increased between 1999–2000 and 2015–16 for all degree programs for which data were available (in constant 2016–17 dollars). Average loan balances approximately doubled for those who completed medical doctorates (from $124,700 to $246,000, an increase of 97%). $145,500 for law degree completers. Ph.D.’s outside the field of education (from $48,400 to $98,800, an increase of 104%), and other non-Ph.D. doctorates (from $64,500 to $132,200, an increase of 105%).

 

OMB Estimated Federal Education Spending Growth 1962-2020

(millions)

 

Year

1962

1963

1964

OMB Estimate

816

985

973

% Annual Growth

17.2%

-1.2%

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1,152

2,416

3,596

4,072

3,990

4,594

5,099

15.5%

52.3%

32.8%

11.9%

-2%

13.1%

9.8%

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

5,537

5,709

5,747

7,331

7,897

8,717

9,828

7.9%

3%

0.7%

21.6%

7.2%

9.4%

11.3%

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

12,167

14,612

16,973

14,707

14,433

15,424

16,596

19.2%

16.7%

13.9%

-15.4%

-1.9%

6.4%

7.1%

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

17,577

16,670

18,145

21,468

22,972

25,196

25,832

5.6%

-5.4%

8.1%

15.5%

6.5%

8.8%

2.5%

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

30,109

24,557

31,205

29,727

30,009

31,294

31,285

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

33,476

35,523

46,373

57,145

62,780

72.858

93,368

6.5%

5.8%

23.4%

18.9%

9%

13.8%

22%

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

66,372

65,963

53,389

93,743

65,484

57,249

40,910

-40.7%

-0.6%

-23.6%

43.1%

-43.2%

-14.4%

-39.9%

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

59,610

103,288

68,506

73,669

80,852

88,426

94,971

31.4%

42.3%

-50.8%

7%

8.9%

8.6%

6.9%

Source: OMB Table 4.1 (2015)

 

8. The education budget fluctuates more than any other department, ostensibly due to the corrupting influence of the student loan subsidy dispute. Nonetheless, for the Historical Record, it is necessary to assume that the official federal budget total is right, although in review of the current year accounting fraud, find that Congress does not pay a 10 cent per dollar, or in fact any student loan subsidy at all. However, the overpayment is the only way to justify the budget cuts, so without redress, that is what occurred. As the result of this accounting fraud, of wildly high subsidies for student loans alternating with abysmally low to negative growth, average total federal education spending growth totals about 4.7%, rather than 3%, that is considered normal. To check the education balance it is necessary to exclude student loans and revenues from mandatory appropriations. 1973 and 1974 seem to be the only years that positive ED spending growth was reported by OMB to be less than 3%. Only by excluding student loans can the next year be estimated. The bipartisan theory is that having achieved normal 3.5% of GDP elementary and secondary school funding levels, ED is deeply troubled by the expensive Democratic negligence to end the wasteful Republican platform to abolish ED, cut education funding or otherwise stunt 3% average annual elementary and secondary education spending growth under Art. 50 of the 4th Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Times of War of 1949. Beginning in FY 17 [$100 billion] student loan program level, savings, revenues, collections and mandatory funds for discretionary programs are to be excluded in brackets from the President's Budget under 2USC§661c.  The most authentic study of the dispute between the President' Budget and Congressional Appropriations regarding the federal education budget is detailed in Education Budget by Major Program 1980-2018. The major problem with the Education budget, is that student loans need to be amortized so that the education budget total is not confused by arbitrary and capricious bribes in pursuit of unsustainable negative subsidies. The dispute between President and Congress regarding negative subsidies 1980-2018 indicates that resolution can be achieved only by an agreement that for no loan subsidies ED would receive no revenues. With no revenues or student loan expenses federal education budget estimates stabilize and 2020 can be estimated. For Congress to stop abusing budget stability with negative subsidies, a student loan balance sheet, with historical and estimated annual repayments, needs to be made public. Congress has only to look at how many years they financed Federal Family Education Loan Program after new loans through that program were discontinued after 2010, to know they know nothing about student loans. To agree upon a just and lasting peace regarding the education budget Congress may prove to President that they also support 3% education spending growth so that they can immediately come to an exact agreement. Furthermore, because the accounting fraud regarding the ED budget total due to student loans, has historically gone unchecked by the Treasury, and must be believed to have been paid as written for partial distribution to the Pell Grant system, it is not adequate for the President to debunk the 10 cent per dollar myth regarding federal subsidies for student loans. The President’s budget must be pre-authorized to actually pay $1 billion annually, 1 cent per dollar, for the full-repayment of defaulted student loans.  3% annual growth for education to compete with 2.7% average annual inflation.

 

9. Several state studies have shown that earning a post-conviction Bachelor's degree is a 100% effective cure for recidivism. Otherwise 25% of people with Associate's degrees, 34% of those released from federal prison, 50% of those with vocational certificates (like police academy) and 66% of everyone on parole are re-incarcerated within three years of being released from prison.  The only middle-income people who can afford an undergraduate degree anymore are undereducated law enforcement officers, who particularly want to be required a minimum of a Bachelor degree and funded part-time through law school. Due to the serious threat of recidivism, police misconduct by undereducated law enforcement officers must result in their immediate termination of employment by police chief. Authorization to the make arrests and carry a firearm conferred by police academy burdens the Court. Undereducated police officers must be swiftly terminated for misconduct and should be given disability insurance until they have achieved a Bachelor degree and are gainfully employed without rush. With 515 justified homicides from legal intervention in 2016, the homicide rate of 1.5 million police officers is 38.6 per 100,000, seven times more than normal 5.3 per 100,000, or 8 per 100,000 for ex-convicts without gun rights. As state employees, state highway patrol, local police and sheriff departments must pay 12.4% OASDI payroll tax to get better than $200 a month disability, probably an extra $1,000 a month. Due process of the obsolescence of state employee retirement programs under Title I of the Social Security Act is needed. With false arrest rates running around 50%, education is essential for law enforcement personnel to be gravely mistaken without hurting anyone very badly, stop doing wrong, and to know through due diligence what it means and feels like to be right on trial regarding issues so complex they require the professional supervision of lawyers. The Bachelor degree seems to confer a philosophical immunity from being a partner in crime, that would theoretically reduce false arrest and torture and improve the fairness of the trial, punishment and rehabilitation of common criminals. Several state studies have shown no recidivism, re-incarceration within three years of release, from people who earned a post-conviction Bachelor degrees, whereas recidivism otherwise ran around 25% for associates degrees, 50% for vocational certificates (such as police academy) and 66% for those otherwise released from state prison. To participate in the study, prisons would correlate the success of their Bachelor degree programs with the elimination of recidivism. To theoretically eliminate the possibility of recidivism and increase Good Time credit, online Bachelor degree programs funded by student loans must be offered to all defendants, especially those sentenced to a lengthy period of incarceration in prison. Student loan collections must not bother the protected people, who will pay as their tax lawyer directs them. Prisoners and student loan collections have a mutual proclivity for engaging in hostilities, reportedly Attorney General incited rampage shootings in the case of student loan collections (academy trained law enforcement officers have so far not perpetrated) that must cease under the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990. As of 2016, there are 1,315,561 Licensed Lawyers in the United States of America. 35 years ago the population of attorneys in the United States had surpassed 450,000, and law schools were graduating 34,000 each year. By 2011, the annual production of law degrees was up to 44,000, and at 1.22 million, the number of lawyers in the country had nearly tripled. In 2011, the number of students entering law school dropped by 7%, an unprecedented fall. In 2012, the drop accelerated: Enrollment of first-year law students sank another 8.6%. It plunged still further in 2013. According to the American Bar Association, 39,675 new law students matriculated in fall of 2013 — an 11% decrease from 2012. To dispel rumors regarding 60% unemployment on graduation from law school, it is recommended that law schools include 4-20 week police and correctional programs, in their three year curriculum. Having saturated the courts with standing juries of public defenders, academy certified lawyers should be preferentially employed as police and corrections officers.

 

Migration Estimates 2001-2017

(thousands)

 

Year

LPR in

LPR out

Adjustment of status

Net legal

Other-in

Other out

Adjustments of status

Net other

Total net immigration

2001

517

265

542

794

1,322

122

542

658

1,453

2002

483

243

487

728

1,259

112

487

660

1,388

2003

414

192

354

575

1,139

123

354

662

1,237

2004

466

250

533

749

1,304

108

533

662

1,411

2005

561

290

597

869

1,791

52

597

1,141

2,010

2006

639

303

573

910

1,450

76

573

801

1,710

2007

584

267

482

800

883

328

482

72

872

2008

635

278

478

835

672

948

478

-754

81

2009

633

277

475

832

752

170

475

106

938

2010

622

262

426

786

678

199

426

53

838

2011

647

264

408

791

606

263

408

-66

725

2012

621

255

401

766

776

131

401

244

1,011

2013

589

249

409

748

939

184

409

346

1,094

2014

627

256

398

769

1,073

364

398

311

1,080

2015

689

271

395

813

1,082

324

395

364

1,177

2016

776

296

408

888

1,450

192

408

849

1,737

2017

700

288

450

863

1,450

231

450

769

1,632

Source: 2018 Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Old Age Survivor Insurance Trust Fund and Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund. 2018. LPR – legal permanent resident.

 

10. Lawful permanent resident (LPR) immigration are persons who enter the Social Security area and are granted LPR status, or who are already in the Social Security area and adjust their status to become LPRs. Legal emigration: LPRs and citizens who leave the Social Security area population. Other-than-LPR immigration: Persons who enter the Social Security area and stay to the end of the year without being granted LPR status, such as undocumented immigrants, foreign workers and students entering with temporary or tourist visas. Other-than-LPR emigration are other-than-LPR immigrants who leave the Social Security area population. Net LPR immigration is the difference between LPR immigration and legal emigration. Net other-than-LPR immigration is the difference between other- than-LPR immigration and other-than-LPR emigration. Total net immigration refers to the sum of net LPR immigration and net other-than-LPR immigration.  English language learner (ELL) is an individual who, has sufficient difficulty speaking, reading, writing, or understanding the English language to be denied the opportunity to learn successfully in classrooms where the language of instruction is English or to participate fully in the larger U.S. society. Such an individual (1) was not born in the United States or has a native language other than English; (2) comes from environments where a language other than English is dominant.  Hispanic high school drop-outs rates are 164% higher than average. In statistical studies by race and ethnicity, the term Hispanic and ELL are somewhat interchangeable because of the large majority of Spanish speakers studying ELL. As a race or ethnicity, Hispanic ELL students have the lowest education attainment levels in the United States. On average 11.2% of the US population drops out of high school. Of those dropouts, 10.5% are white, 11.3% are black and 29.5% are Hispanic.  The rates vary according to age. Students who are in grades 9-10 (ages 14-16) drop out at the following rates: 5.9% of whites, 7.4% of blacks, and 15.8% of Hispanics. The Hispanic drop-out rate increased from 12.5% in 1980 to a high of 19% in 1990.  Approximately 10% of Hispanic dropouts obtained a GED credential, which is a far lower rate than the nearly 20% of African American dropouts and 30% of White dropouts. About 40% of dropouts (who typically left school at 16 or 17 years old) had obtained a GED by age 29 years whereas only 2.79% of GED holders had earned an associate’s degree by age 29. Only 23% of GED holders were enrolled in a postsecondary institution for as little as a single semester. The Intergovernmental Conference to Adopt the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration was held in Marrakech, Morocco, 10 and 11 December 2018 reaffirmed the New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants A/Res/71/1 3 October 2016. Today, there are over 258 million migrants around the world living outside their country of birth, more than 3.6% of the total world population.  there are roughly 65 million forcibly displaced persons, including over 21 million refugees, 3 million asylum seekers and over 40 million internally displaced persons.  The number of refugees and migrants who have left Venezuela worldwide has now reached three million, since the death of Hugo Chavez. Most of the 3 million are currently hosted by countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, accounting for about 2.4 million refugees and migrants from Venezuela.  United States sanctions did not do 200,000% inflation justice, nor did Venezuela's impromptu response to the United Nations, but the food program is reported to be financed and a civilian government is to be encouraged. The Caravans of pedestrians entering the United States from Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala seem to be protesting high homicide rates in Central America. For a time, Honduras had the highest homicide rate in the world. Central Americans are willing to walk thousands of miles to reduce their average homicide victimization risk from more than 24 to 5.3 per 100,000 or 2 in Canada. The Central American refugees are not blaming Venezuelan refugees for the gang violence and political persecution by the military, that is displacing them, they are blaming post-Hugo Chavez military dictatorships and the U.S. foreign military finance and military education that finance them. Few Venezuelan refugees risk migration to Central America or want to go as far as the United States. The Central American refugees do not feel safe from the serial killings of migrants that occurred during the Mexican drug war and are responding directly to Operation Fast and Furious with a Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration dated 2016 and 2018.  Representation of English language proficiency and GED greatly increases likelihood an immigrant visa under 8USC§1153 or application for asylum under 8USC§1158 and 8USC§1522 will be granted.  Asylum requests have increased nearly 70% over the past year. Customs and Border Protection officers typically review 40 to 100 asylum requests a day, which significantly slows down the legal process of non-immigrant visas. To apply for Asylum, file a Form I-589, Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal, within one year of your arrival to the United States. There is no fee to apply for asylum.  Just get through the border with a less than $10 tax on non-immigrant visas under 8USC§1184, Art. 1 Sec. 9 Cl. 1 of the US Constitution, Sec. 2 of the Fourth Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Times of War (1949) and Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Their Families (1990).  

 

Sanders, Tony J.  Chapter 4: State Mental Institution Library Education (SMILE). 11th Ed. Hospitals & Asylums. HA-20-12-18. 374 pgs. PDF ; Word