Hospitals & Asylums    

 

Welcome

Atlas

Statute

 

End of FY 2007 HA-20-9-07

 

By Tony Sanders

 

To Nominate Elaine Chao, Secretary of Labor, and Alphonso Jackson, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Republican Presidential Candidates

 

Be it enacted in the House and Senate, Assembled

 

Balanced Budget Amendment to the US Constitution

 

Section 1 Total outlays for any fiscal year shall not exceed total receipts for that fiscal year.

 

Section 2 Prior to each fiscal year, the President shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the United States Government for that fiscal year in which total outlays do not exceed total receipts.

 

Section 3 The Congress shall enforce and implement a balanced budget by appropriate legislation.

 

Balancing the Trillion Dollar Account Deficit in billions 2000 – 2010 with HA 2007-2010

 

Table 1-1

Int’l

Def

OASI

Rev

Exp

 Fed Sav

Int. Trade

Acct Def

Debt

GDP

2000

12

294.50

411.68

2,025

1,788

87

-452

-365

5,628

9,719

2001

14

305.50

434.06

1,991

1,860

-33

-427

-460

5,770

10,022

2002

15

349.56

440.54

1,853

2,011

-317

-483

-800

6,198

10,339

2003

35

388.87

447.81

1,782

2,157

-375

-547

-922

6,780

10,828

2004

15

437.12

457.12

1,880

2,292

-412

-665

-1077

7,355

11,552

2005

17

444.07

479.89

2,052

2,479

-400

-783

-1183

8,058

12,227

2006

25

470

507.09

2,407

2,655

-248

-759

-1007

8,451

13,065

2007

30

463

537.85

2,577

2,771

-158

-711

-868

8,899

13,721

2008

35

485.2

568.09

2,771

2,925

-155

 

 

9,364

14,401

2009

40

505.3

599.95

2,855

3,071

-215

 

 

9,905

15,120

2010

50

515.3

635.31

2,950

3,071

-255

 

 

10,501

15,881

HA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2007

50

450

422.6

2,577

2,550

27

-711

-679

8,890

13,721

2008

65

400

493.5

2,771

2,663

108

-700

-562

8,700

14,401

2009

75

375

511.5

2,855

2,710

145

-625

-445

8,650

15,120

2010

90

390

531.7

2,950

2,825

125

-500

-335

8,500

15,881

 

Source: CBO and HA

 

1. Having had my balanced budget of 1 January 2007 ignored by the 110th Congress who made their first unsuccessful attempt to redress the deficit without sufficient historical basis or objective, I would like to nominate Elaine Chao, Secretary of Labor and Alphonso Jackson, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development candidates for President in the 2008 elections.  The Republican minority party desperately needs minority candidates to compete with the Democratic campaign to put a black man in the White House without appearing as tyrants.  Both of these executives would benefit from The White House predicts that the deficit this year drop to $205 billion. But the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicts the government deficit will be "toward the lower end" of a $150 billion to $200 billion range. Democrats and the Bush administration have been at odds over the nation's fiscal situation. Democrats believe the shrinking deficits won't last. President Bush, meanwhile, has called on the Democratic-controlled Congress to show some restraint in its spending.  So far this budget year, the biggest spending categories are programs from the Health and Human Services Department, including Medicare and Medicaid, $560.2 billion; Social Security, $516.1 billion; military, $437.7 billion, and interest on the public debt, $385.1 billion.

Federal Savings 1998-2007

 

graphic

     

Source: CBO

 

2. The end of the fiscal year for the federal government is on September 30 under 1USC(2)§105.  Once again it is time for the military and social security to return surplus funds.  This year the federal government must account for these returns and not conceal them as revenues.  Congress agreed upon a pay as you go strategy under 2USC(20)I§902.  Now that the end of the fiscal year has arrived Congress must enforce the agreed upon spending limits under 2USC(20)§901 and deficit targets under 2USC(20)I§903.   Federal Government spending turned up, increasing 5.9 percent after a 6.3-percent decrease in the first quarter. The upturn in Federal Government spending reflected an upturn in national defense spending, which increased 8.6 percent after a 10.8-percent decrease in the first quarter.  Non-defense spending slowed, increasing 0.5 percent after a 3.8-percent increase in the first quarter.  Current receipts for the federal government are estimated by the BEA at $2,685.5 billion and expenditures at $2,876.9 billion yielding what they term a savings of - $191.4 billion.  CBO expects the 2007 deficit to total $158 billion, a $90 billion decline from the $250 billion deficit recorded for 2006.  For 2007, CBO anticipates a deficit of $158 billion, $47 billion less than OMB’s estimate of $205 billion.  Both agencies expect about the same amount of revenues to come in this year, but CBO anticipates $44 billion less in outlays than OMB does. 

 

 

3. CBO expects the 2007 deficit to total $158 billion a $90 billion decline from the deficit recorded for 2006.  Relative to the size of the economy, the deficit this year is expected to equal 1.2 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), down from 1.9 percent in 2006. The deficit for 2007 is now expected to be $19 billion lower than the amount that CBO estimated in March 1.  Higher-than-anticipated revenues, mostly from individual income taxes, improved the budget outlook for this year; they were partially offset by outlays from supplemental appropriations that were enacted after CBO prepared its March projections.  In particular, CBO expects revenues in 2007 to exceed its March estimate by $35 billion, or 1.4 percent. At the same time, outlays this year are expected to be $16 billion, or about 0.6 percent, higher than CBO’s March estimate, primarily because of $117 billion supplemental appropriations for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan in May. 

 


 



4. Government saving, the difference between current receipts and current expenditures of the Federal Government and state and local governments, was –$183.4 billion in the second quarter of 2007, increasing $40.9 billion from –$224.3 billion in the first quarter. Net Federal Government saving was –$191.4 billion in the second quarter, increasing $27.1 billion from –$218.5 billion in the first quarter. Current receipts accelerated, and current expenditures decelerated. Net state and local government saving was $8.0 billion in the second quarter, increasing $13.8 billion from –$5.8 billion in the first quarter. Current receipts and current expenditures decelerated. Net borrowing was $363.1 billion in the second quarter, decreasing $41.4 billion from $404.5 billion in the first quarter. Federal Government net borrowing was $249.2 billion in the second quarter, decreasing $26.4 billion from $275.6 billion in the first quarter. State and local government net borrowing was $113.9 billion in the second quarter, decreasing $15.0 billion from $128.9 billion in the first quarter.

 

Total Tax Receipts, 1929-2002



5. The general fiscal outlook for the coming decade remains about the same as what CBO projected in March. If the laws and policies currently in place did not change, the deficit for 2008 would fall slightly, to 1.1 percent of GDP, and then rise to about 1.5 percent of GDP for 2009 and 2010, CBO projects. In the years that follow, deficits would give way to small surpluses as a result of higher revenues associated with the scheduled expiration of tax provisions originally enacted in the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) and the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (JGTRRA). Total outlays are projected to remain steady at roughly 20 percent of GDP over the next 10 years. Total revenues are projected to remain close to 19 percent of GDP through 2010 about their level in 2007 and then rise to more than 20 percent following the scheduled expiration of EGTRRA and JGTRRA.

 

 

6. Over the long term, the budget remains on an unsustainable path. Unless changes are made to current policies, growing demand for resources caused by rising health care costs and the nation’s expanding elderly population will put increasing pressure on the budget. Federal spending on Medicare and Medicaid is expected to total 4.6 percent of GDP this year, and, without changes in law, such spending will rise to 5.9 percent of GDP in 2017—an increase of nearly 30 percent in just 10 years, CBO estimates. Over the same period, spending on Social Security will rise from 4.2 percent of GDP to 4.8 percent.  Medicare and Medicaid have increased about 2.5 percentage points faster per year than has per capita GDP.  If those costs continue to increase at that rate, federal spending on those two programs alone would rise from 4.6 percent of GDP this year to about 20 percent by 2050. Demographic changes in the programs can explain only about 2.5 percentage points of that increase, underscoring that the rate at which health care costs grow, not the aging of the population, is the key determinant of the nation’s long-term fiscal outlook.  A 3 percent cap on annual inflation in health care costs has been proposed to sustain ably keep the health sector in sync with the economy and eliminate the corruption driving this disproportionate inflation.

 

 

 

7. Social security revenues represent 6.34% and expenditures 5.77% of the $13.85 trillion gross domestic product.  162 million workers, 54% of the 300 million population, had earnings covered by a 13.85% in social security taxation.  Workers and employers each paid 6.2% OASDI tax on the first $94,200 of earnings and 1.45% Medicare tax on all wages. Self-employed individuals paid 12.4% on OASDI and 2.9% on Hospital Insurance.  To eliminate poverty SSA would only need to tax the income of the wealthy.  There is an enormous backlog of disability insurance petitions of 700,000 with the Administrative Law Judges and 1.6 million with the administrative staff of petitioners unhappy with their level of benefits.  There seems to be a problem regarding bio-terrorism stemming from the $66.60 Medicare premium in 2004 that is corrupting state assistance programs and vulnerable private caregivers.   Recent reports indicate that people treated for mental illness in the public health system are dying 25 years younger than the national average rather 10 to 15 years younger as in 1990s.  SSA fails to uphold the new income exemptions, discounting the first $20 of income, and the first $65 of income and one half of income thereafter, whereby any disabled person with a monthly income less than $1,321 is eligible as Sanders v. Astrue HA-3-6-7. 

 

Plan to Eliminate the Budget Deficit with the SSA Surplus 2007-2012

Source: HA Chapter 3 HaW

 

8. CBO recognizes that there is no danger of insolvency in the trust funds until 2017 when the tax rates will probably need to be adjusted upwards.  In fact it is the enormous solvency of the trust funds that is disturbing.  As of 31 December 2006 OASDI had $2,048.1 billion in savings, $1,844.4 billion in OASI and $203.9 billion in DI.  Having accumulated the largest savings account in the world at a time when citizens have ceased to save any money and the federal government is running a deficit SSA has a responsibility to both the alleviation of poverty and to balance the federal budget.  Having failed to alleviate poverty as they promise SSA has no excuse to withhold surplus funds from the cause of eliminating the budget deficit.  SSA should make returns to the Treasury equivalent to two thirds the amount needed to balance the budget not to exceed all tax revenues in excess of the cost of benefits and one half of their interest earnings so that SSA would still show a profit and the trust funds would grow, albeit at a slower rate.  Using the Intermediate projections of the OASDI Trustees in 2007 2/3 of the deficit is $117 billion, slightly more than the difference between tax revenues and cost plus half interest earning thereby limiting contributions to the Treasury from SSA to $115.3 billion, leaving $73.2 billion to bring the trust fund balance to $2,121.3 rather than $2,236.6 billion at the end of 2007.  The deficit is projected to be less or non-existent in future years in the short term so 2/3 of need is calculated.  The accumulation of the OASDI balance is actually more reasonable after making contributions and the fund crosses the $3 trillion threshold in 2012 rather than 2011 as it would under current intermediate projections.

 

 

9. Since September 2001, the Congress and the President have provided a total of $602 billion in budget authority for military and diplomatic operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other regions in support of the war on terrorism and for related veterans benefits and services.  Specific appropriations, which averaged about $93 billion a year from 2003 through 2005, have risen to $120 billion in 2006 and $170 billion in 2007. According to estimates by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), about $533 billion of the appropriated sums has been allocated for U.S. military operations and other activities carried out by the Department of Defense (DoD). Lawmakers have also provided approximately $30 billion to train and equip indigenous security forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. In addition, $39 billion has been provided for reconstruction and relief efforts, diplomatic and consular operations, embassy construction, economic support, and foreign aid.  DoD reports that it has obligated almost $11 billion per month thus far in 2007 for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and for other activities related to the war on terrorism, an increase of nearly $3 billion compared with average monthly obligations in 2006. Operation Iraqi Freedom accounted for approximately 85 percent of all reported obligations; Operation Enduring Freedom accounted for another 15 percent. CBO projects outlays of roughly $115 billion for war-related defense activities in 2007, an average of between $9 billion and $10 billion a month. Of the funds appropriated for international affairs activities related to the war close to $25 billion has been spent through 2006 and that another $5 billion will be spent in 2007.

 

Defense Budget and Federal Budget Deficit 1990-2006

 

Source: Office of Management and Budget Historic Budget Tables

 

10. Congress is responsible for establishing spending limits to reduce the deficit.  If waste, fraud and abuse in Defense programs can be reigned in for a gross aggregate military expenditure of not more than $400 billion it might be possible to balance the budget this 2007.  However neither the President nor Congress have demonstrated a competency to balance the budget.  The experience with balancing the budget at the turn of the millennium and in FY 2006 reinforce the neo-classical principle that levies for war cause the government to get into debt and that by restraining military spending a little bit dramatic progress can be made eliminating the budget deficit.  By reducing defense spending in FY 2006 to $470 billion from $501 billion the deficit was miraculously reduced from $320 billion to $250 billion.  A considerable amount of this savings, $30-$50 billion can be attributed to the return of surplus funds allocated the military, the rest is probably the result of the improved functioning of the real economy as the result of the flight of military capital although their interests seem to control GDP statistics.  Throughout the 1990s military spending was kept below the cap of $300 billion, that most people considered too high, in the first decade of the 21st century all discipline was removed from military spending under the guise of the levy for the Global War on Terror and more recently the troop surge.  It is not too late to restore limits to military spending and crack down on the laundering monetary instruments under 18USCI(95)§1956. 

 

Long Range Forecast 2005-2011 (in billions)

 

 

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

DoD

483.9

468.2

441

464.2

483.8

493.9

504.2

Total National Defense

505.8

491.8

463

485.2

505.3

515.3

526.1

S Con Res 21 Budget Authority

 

 

619.4

648.8

584.7

545.3

551.1

S Con Res 21 Out lays

 

 

560.5

617.8

626.9

572.9

558.4

HA DoD

 

 

450

400

375

390

400

 

Source: DoD. Table 1-2 National Defense Budget Estimates FY 2007 March 2006 and S.CON.RES.21.ES

 

11. A Military budget of $400 billion after $60 billion reduction in superfluous Cold War armament and weapons maintenance is possible. In the 2007 defense budget: $111 billion (about 25 percent) will be spent on the pay and benefits of 1.4 million active duty and 800,000 selected or ready reserve military personnel. (The pay of a reservist who is mobilized or called to active duty, as 400,000 have been since September 11, is funded in the supplemental appropriation.) The Pentagon spends $154 billion or 33 percent of its budget on routine operating and maintenance costs for its 21 Army and Marine active and reserve ground divisions, 11 Navy Carrier battle groups, and 31 Air Force, Navy and Marine air wings. Included in this are pay and benefits for the 700,000 civilians employed by the Department of Defense. (The operations and maintenance costs of the forces in Iraq are also covered in the supplemental appropriation.) Another $174 billion or 38 percent of the budget goes for new investment. This is broken down into $84 billion for buying new planes and ships and tanks; $73 billion for doing research and developing and testing new weapons; and $17 billion for building the facilities for the troops and equipment. The vast majority of the final 5 percent or $24 billion is spent by the Department of Energy on maintaining and safeguarding the 10,000 nuclear weapons in our inventory.  At this time, the end of the fiscal year, DoD must return surplus funds in excess of 25% reserve.  Even with the troops surge spending should not exceed $500 billion.

 

 

12. CBO estimates that federal debt will reach the current limit of $8.965 trillion sometime during the last calendar quarter of 2007.  At the end of 2007, CBO expects, debt held by the public will total $5.0 trillion and debt held by government accounts will equal $3.9 trillion. Under the assumptions governing the baseline, net interest costs are projected to rise from $253 billion in 2008 to a peak of $292 billion in 2012 an average annual increase of 3.7 percent.  After 2012, net interest slowly falls by an average rate of 1.0 percent a year to $278 billion in 2017. Relative to GDP, net interest is projected to remain steady at 1.8 percent through 2010 and then slowly fall to 1.3 percent by 2017.   The federal debt is unsustainable and threatens future generations.  The federal government must resolve to balance the budget, stay out of debt, and in fact make progress paying off the debt with pretend payments such as achieving targets for Official Development Assistance in exchange for debt relief.

13. On average, the value of the dollar fell by 2.1 percent against the currencies of the United States’ major trading partners last year, and 
CBO expects declines of between 2 percent and 3 percent in 2007 and 2008.  On 11 September 2007 shortly after Manuel Antonio Noriega 
v. United States of America HA-9-9-07 proceeded to educate the US in civil rights in the context of a European conspiracy the dollar fell to 
a new all-time low.  The 13-nation euro rose as high as $1.3901 in late afternoon European trading topping its previous record of $1.3852, 
reached on July 24, 2007.  It almost immediately fell back to $1.3889, compared with the $1.3832 it bought the day before. The dollar was 
lower on Wednesday against the British pound, drifting down to $2.0296 from its level of $2.0317 in New York late Tuesday.The U.S. 
currency was lower against the Japanese yen, the dollar ambled down to 114.27 yen from 114.30 yen.  Reason for this devaluation is that 
the BEA estimated economic growth at 4% in the second quarter of 2007 BEA 07-38 30 August.  It was not recommended for the dollar to 
devaluate with the Euro because the EU was overtly Conspiring to defraud the Government with respect to claims in deprivation of our rights 
under color of law.  Instead it was recommended for the US to be punished with continuing devaluation with China and Panama as well as 
Mexico to provide more incentive for migrant workers to stay at home.
 

 

Source: BEA

 

14. Real gross domestic product (GDP) is reported to have increased 4.0 percent in the second quarter, according to the “preliminary” estimates of the national income and product accounts (NIPAs); it increased 0.6 percent in the first quarter. The second-quarter growth rate was revised up 0.6 percentage point from the “advance” estimate. The acceleration in real GDP growth in the second quarter primarily reflected a downturn in imports (subtracted in the derivation of GDP), upturns in Federal Government spending and in inventory investment, accelerations in exports and in nonresidential structures, and a smaller decrease in residential investment. In contrast, consumer spending decelerated markedly.  Prices of goods and services purchased by U.S. residents increased 3.8 percent in the second quarter, the same as in the first quarter. Energy prices accelerated sharply, and food prices decelerated somewhat. Excluding food and energy, prices increased 1.6 percent, following an increase of 3.1 percent in the first quarter.  Real disposable personal income (DPI) increased 0.1 percent after increasing 5.4 percent in the first quarter. Current-dollar DPI decelerated, and prices (as measured by the PCE implicit price deflator used to deflate DPI) accelerated, resulting in the slowing of the overall real measure. The personal saving rate, personal saving as a percentage of current-dollar DPI, was 0.5 percent in the second quarter; in the first quarter, it was 1.0 percent.

 

 

15. According to CBO’s projections, GDP will increase by 2.1 percent in real (inflation-adjusted) terms this calendar year and by 2.9 percent in 2008.  Employment growth, which slowed slightly in late 2006, is expected to continue to increase moderately, thereby keeping the unemployment rate near its current 4.6 percent through 2008.  Inflation, as measured by the year-to-year change in the consumer price index for all urban consumers (CPI-U), is projected to decline from 2.8 percent this year to 2.3 percent next year. Prices for food and energy, which increased during the first half of this year, are expected to moderate, keeping overall inflation lower than in the recent past. In addition, the underlying (or core) rate of consumer price inflation is expected to be relatively stable, averaging slightly above 2 percent over the next year and a half.  Economic projections for the near term, however, are subject to significant uncertainty. Over the 2009–2017 period, CBO projects that real growth will average 2.7 percent and inflation as measured by the CPI-U, 2.2 percent.

GDP % Change from Previous Year According the BEA and OMB

 

 

Source: Table 7 Gross Domestic Product: First Quarter 2007 BEA 07-18 and Calculations from Office of Management and Budget Historic Budget Tables as Studied in Table 2-3 of the 2007 HA Lobbying Activity Disclosure (LAD)

 

16. There is always a significant margin of error when doing macro-economic accounting.  The economy is simply too large to be 100% accurate and in practice a margin of error of up to 25% should be anticipated.  For instance macro-economic accounting of the US Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has recently come into question.  In the United States economic activity slowed in the middle part of 2006.  There was a general economic slowdown in growth from 5.3% in the first two quarters and 2.4% in the second half.  These figures are down notably from the nearly 3-1/2 percent average pace of the preceding two years.  The slowdown in the growth of real GDP largely reflects a cooling of the housing market (Bies Nov. 2, 2006).  Economic growth in 2006 is set to reach 2.8% in the European Union and 2.6% in the euro area, up from 1.7% and 1.4% in 2005, according to the European Commission’s autumn economic forecasts (Bernanke Aug. 31, 2006).   In the first quarter of 2007 GDP increased at an annual rate of 1.3 percent in the first quarter of 2007 (BEA 07-18).  This rate of growth does not explain the change in GDP reported in the dollar amounts by the either the BEA or the OMB.  This discrepancy is however not new, so it is difficult to go back to a date that one trusts and begin calculating anew.

 

Gross Domestic Product and National Income Disputes (bill. US Dollars)

 

Statistic

2004

2005

2006

GDP high

11,713

12,456

13,247

GDP low

10,256

10,812

11,415

GNI high

9,731

10,239

10,883

GNI low

8,011

8,105

8,313

 

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

 

17. A leading cause of market stress is that the national projections of GDP and GNI are too high in the US.  Real gross domestic product, the output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the United States, is estimated to have increased at the low annual rate of 0.6 through 1.3 percent in the first quarter of 2007.  In the fourth quarter of 2006, real GDP increased 2.5 percent.  In 2005 real GDP grew an estimated 3.75 percent.  The slowdown in the growth of real GDP largely reflects the cooling of the housing market.  The slowdown in growth can also be attributed to a long history of overestimating GDP figures to facilitate the closing of loans to the federal government.  For instance although growth was estimated at 1.3 percent by BEA it was recorded at 5.5 percent in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).  Gross National Income (GNI) is also disputed because of the widening gap between the rich and poor demonstrated in the increasing inability of homeowners to afford their mortgages.  By acknowledging these disputes in regards to the national system of accounts the government can forestall a recession and enjoy greater immunity from inflation and debt by recalculating GDP and GNI to more realistic, lower rates, where investors, analysts and consumers would find greater accuracy and satisfaction.

 

Home Sales and Foreclosure Estimates 2004-1st Quarter 2007

 

Year

Home Sales (annually adjusted)

Change in annual Home Sales

Foreclosure Filings

Change in Foreclosures

2004

6,778,000

N/A

677,586

N/A

2005

7,076,000

4.3%

885,000

25%

2006

6,478,000

-8.5%

1,259,118

42%

January 2007

6,440,000

-0.5%

130,511

24.4%

February

6,680,000

3.1%

130,786

0.2%

March

6,120,000

-5.5%

149,150

14%

 

Source: Total Existing Home Sales, National Association of Realtors; Foreclosures, Realty Trac.

 

18. Sales of both new and existing homes dropped sharply after their peak in the summer of 2005, the inventory of unsold homes has soared, and the number of single-family and multifamily housing starts has fallen nearly 30 percent since the beginning of last year. At the same time, homes are appreciating more slowly and in some markets prices are even declining.  After more than a decade of setting one sales record after another the housing market entered a period of somewhat lower sales and less robust price gains in late 2005 and early 2006.  Existing-home sales peaked at over 7.2 million units in the second half of 2005 but have declined steadily through the first half of 2006. The number of foreclosure filings reported in the U.S. last month more than doubled versus August 2006 and jumped 36 percent from July, a trend that signals many homeowners are increasingly unable to make timely payments on their mortgages or sell their homes amid a national housing slump.  A total of 243,947 foreclosure filings were reported in August, up 115 percent from 113,300 in the same month a year ago, Irvine, Calif.-based RealtyTrac Inc. said Tuesday. There were 179,599 foreclosure filings reported in July.  August's total represents the highest number of foreclosure filings reported in a single month since the company began tracking monthly filings two years ago. The national foreclosure rate last month was one filing for every 510 households.  Expressing heightened awareness of the need for an Adjustable Rate Mortgage (ARM) Ban HA-10-5-07 RealtyTrac Chief Executive James J. Saccacio said.

 

"The jump in foreclosure filings this month might be the beginning of the next wave of increased foreclosure activity, as a large number of subprime adjustable rate loans are beginning to reset now."

 

Outstanding Mortgage Debt 2007 (in millions of US dollars)

 

Type of holder and property

2003

2004

2005

2006

All holder

9,368,870

10,672,100

12,133,840

13,315,070

One- to four-family residences

7,168,933

8,237,910

9,367,860

10,199,330

Multifamily residences

555,697

609,099

680,072

731,039

Non-farm, nonresidential

1,510,655

1,683,373

1,937,991

2,221,260

Farm

133,586

141,718

147,914

163,440

 

 

Source: Statistical Supplement to the Federal Reserve Bulletin, April 2007, 1.54

 

19. The rate of house-price appreciation slowed dramatically in 2006 after nearly a decade of rapid increases, and prices appear to have moved roughly sideways in the first half of 2007. The purchase-only version of the repeat-transactions price index for existing single-family homes published by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, which tracks sales prices of the same houses over time, rose at an annual rate of just 2 percent in the first quarter of 2007 (the latest available data) and was up just 3 percent over the year ending in the first quarter, compared with an increase of 10 percent over the preceding year. For April and May combined, the average price of existing single-family homes sold--which does not control for changes in the mix of houses sold but is available on a more timely basis--was about 1 percent below that of a year earlier.  On average, sales of existing homes over the three months ending in May 2007 were 4-1/2 percent below their average level in the second half of last year, while sales of new homes were down 10 percent over that period. The further weakening of housing demand this year likely reflects, in part, tighter lending standards for mortgages, and it occurred despite mortgage rates that were relatively low by longer-run standards. The ongoing slippage in sales has made it more difficult for homebuilders to make much of a dent in their inventories of new homes for sale.

 

Chart of change in house prices, 1984 to 2007.

 

20. Delinquency rates on subprime mortgages with variable interest rates, which account for about 9 percent of all first-lien mortgages outstanding, continued to climb in the first five months of 2007 and reached a level more than double the recent low for this series, which was recorded in mid-2005. The rise in delinquencies has begun to show through to new foreclosures. In the first quarter of 2007, an estimated 325,000 foreclosure proceedings were initiated, up from an average quarterly rate of 230,000 over the preceding two years; about half of the foreclosures this year were on subprime mortgages. The decline in credit quality in the subprime sector has likely stemmed from a combination of several factors, including the moderation in overall economic growth and some regional economic weakness. In addition, a substantial number of subprime borrowers with variable-rate mortgages have faced an upward adjustment of the rates from their initial levels. When house prices were rising rapidly and rates on new loans were lower, many of these borrowers qualified to refinance into another loan with more-favorable terms. With house prices having decelerated and rates having moved higher, however, the scope for refinancing has been reduced. Moreover, investor owners may have been tempted to walk away from properties with little or no equity. Subprime mortgages originated in late 2005 and 2006 have shown unusually high rates of early delinquency, suggesting that some lenders unduly loosened underwriting standards during that period.

 

Chart of mortgage delinquency rates, 2001 to 2007. 

 

21. The mortgage industry has been rocked by a surge in defaults, particularly among borrowers with subprime loans and adjustable rate mortgages that initially had attractive "teaser" interest rates but then can adjust upward, resulting in a payment shock. Many of the loans, some of which adjust in as little as two years, were issued in 2005 and 2006 during the height of the housing boom.  The number of bank repossessions jumped to 42,789 in August, compared with 20,116 a year earlier. In July, there were 26,842 bank repossessions. Nevada, California and Florida had the highest foreclosure rates in the country last month, the firm said. Nevada reported one foreclosure filing for every 165 households - more than three times the national average. The state had 6,197 filings in August, an increase of 21 percent from July and more than triple the year-ago figure. California's foreclosure rate was one filing for every 224 households. The state reported the most foreclosure filings of any single state with 57,875, up 48 percent from July and an increase of more than 300 percent from August 2006. Florida had one foreclosure filing for every 243 households. In all, the state reported 33,932 foreclosure filings, up 77 percent from July's total and more than twice the year-ago total. Georgia, Ohio, Michigan, Arizona, Colorado, Texas and Indiana rounded out the 10 states with the highest foreclosure rates.   Erpenbeck v. US S.D. US.6th Cir. No. 04-3456&7 (2004) seems to have been the case that burst the bubble after the Erpenbecks were sentenced to be trafficked from Ohio to Kentucky and Florida where both prisoners in need Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights under 42USC§1983 to save fiscal year 2007 are located.  They finally caught the bank robber, he was promoted to Appellate Judge.

 

Chart of personal saving rate, 1984 to 2007.

 

22. After fluctuating in the vicinity of 2 percent from 1999 to 2004, the saving rate subsequently dropped sharply, and it stood at negative 1-1/4 percent, on average, in April and May of 2007.  After exhibiting considerable vigor in late 2006, consumer spending slowed somewhat over the first half of 2007. In August, commodity prices fell alongside stocks as investors pulled their money out of riskier assets and placed it in safer securities like Treasurys. But they have since bounced back. Crude oil prices rose above $81 a barrel.  Wholesale prices fell in August by the largest amount in 10 months, reflecting a plunge in the price of gasoline and other energy products and the fourth straight month of falling food costs. The Labor Department said Tuesday that wholesale prices fell by 1.4 percent last month, the best showing since a 1.5 percent fall last October. It was a much bigger decline than the 0.3 percent drop that had been expected and was led by a 6.6 percent plunge in energy costs, the biggest drop in more than four years. Core inflation, which excludes food and energy, was also well under control, rising by just 0.2 percent. The good price performance should further ease concerns about inflation and gives the Federal Reserve the leeway to cut interest rates to guard against the possibility of a recession. 

 

Chart of change in real income and consumption, 2001 to 2007. 

 
23. Payroll employment weakened in August.  Nonfarm payrolls fell 4,000, and private payrolls rose only 24,000, the first outright 
decline in four years.  Smoothing through the recent monthly numbers, private payrolls increased an average of about 70,000 per 
month over the past three months; this is down from gains near 120,000 per month in the first five months of the year and about 
165,000 per month in the second half of 2006.  As you know, from 1995 to 2000, productivity in the nonfarm business sector 
increased at an average annual rate of 2-1/2 percent, well above the lackluster pace of the preceding twenty-five years.  Then, 
remarkably, productivity accelerated further, rising at an average of about 3-1/2 percent per year for the first three years of this 
decade, since the middle of 2004, however, the growth of labor productivity has slowed, registering an average annual rate of 
about 1-1/4 percent.  Personal income increased $61.9 billion, or 0.5 percent, and disposable personal income (DPI)increased 
$57.3 billion, or 0.6 percent, in July, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.  As measured by changes in the price index 
for personal consumption expenditures (PCE inflation), inflation ran at an annual rate of 4.4 percent over the first five months of 
this year.  Food and beverage costs rose 3.9% in May from a year earlier. Personal consumption expenditures (PCE) increased 
$37.8 billion, or 0.4 percent in July.  In June, personal income increased $45.7 billion, or 0.4 percent, DPI increased $36.5 billion, 
or 0.4 percent, and PCE increased $16.1 billion, or 0.2 percent, based on revised estimates.  The forecasts for core PCE inflation are
2 to 2-1/4 percent for 2007 and 1-3/4 to 2 percent in 2008.
 

Source: Bankrate.com 
 
24. In response to FRB’s half percent reduction in interest rates from 5.33 to 4.92 percent on 18 September the Dow Jones industrial 
average rose 64.71, or 0.48 percent, to 13,468.13. The broader stock indexes also advanced. Standard & Poor's 500 index rose 6.43, 
or 0.44 percent, to 1,483.08, while the Nasdaq composite index gained 6.18, or 0.24 percent, to 2,587.84. Bonds fell, with the yield 
on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note rising to 4.49 percent from 4.47 percent while the New York Mercantile Exchange to a new 
record. The dollar fell against the euro Tuesday and pound but rose versus the yen. Advancing issues outnumbered decliners by nearly 
2 to 1 on the New York Stock Exchange, where volume came to 184.2 million shares. In European trading, Britain's FTSE 100 rose 
0.99 percent, Germany's DAX index rose 0.61 percent and France's CAC-40 rose 1.56 percent. In Asia, Japan's Nikkei index fell 
2.02 percent and Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index fell 0.09 percent. Doing a round of interviews to promote his new book, Greenspan, 
who was Fed chairman for 18 1/2 years, said Bernanke was "doing an excellent job" and he doubted that he would have done anything 
differently. Greenspan told The Associated Press that the odds of a recession have grown since earlier this year, even though "the 
economy is not doing badly at this stage." He put the odds of a recession at greater than one in three. "But best I can judge it is less 
than 50 percent" he said. Greenspan's one-in-three prediction earlier this year rocked Wall Street. 

 

Souce: Badiali, Matt. America to Stop all Oil Imports from the Middle East. Stansberry & Associates. 2006

 

25. Oil futures reached record highs. Of the 2 trillion barrels of proven oil in the Green River Formation between 800 billion and 1.2 trillion barrels are recoverable. That’s the amount of oil we can actually get out and use.  It’s estimated that tapping U.S. oil shale would decrease domestic oil prices by as much as five percent a year.  Light, sweet crude for October delivery fell 2 cents to $80.55 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange, fluctuating after rising to a record $81.24 overnight in electronic trading.  October gasoline fell 1.16 cents to $2.0326 a gallon on the Nymex, while heating oil futures fell 2.08 cents to $2.2079 a gallon. October natural gas fell 37.5 cents to $6.278 per 1,000 cubic feet. Natural gas prices have been volatile in recent days as tropical weather threats to critical gas and oil infrastructure in the Gulf of Mexico have grown or subsided. In London, October Brent crude fell 42 cents to $76.56 a barrel on the ICE Futures exchange. At the pump, meanwhile, gas prices slipped 0.1 cent overnight to a national average of $2.787 a gallon. Retail prices, which typically lag the futures market, peaked at $3.227 a gallon in late May.  Crude inventories fell by 1.5 million barrels, on average, in the week ending Sept. 14, while gasoline supplies fell by 1.3 million barrels. Refinery utilization likely fell by 0.5 percentage point to 90 percent of capacity, and distillate inventories, which include heating oil and diesel fuel, rose by 1.1 million barrels. Last week, prices rose despite OPEC's decision to boost production by 500,000 barrels a day this fall. Many analysts and investors saw that increase as too little.  Oil prices drew additional support from new comments by Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries officials that suggested the oil cartel won't increase production to push oil prices below $80 a barrel, Abdullah bin Hamad Al Attiyah, Qatar's oil minister said,

"OPEC has done what it can.  I see no need for additional oil supply that the market won't absorb."

 

26. The U.S. current international trade account deficit expanded sharply in the latter part of the 1990s and the first half of the present decade.  In 1996, the U.S. deficit was $125 billion, or 1.6 percent of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP); by 2004, it had grown to $640 billion, or 5.5 percent of GDP.  The U.S. current account deficit has widened further in the past two years.  The international trade deficit rose from $640 billion in 2004 (5.5 percent of GDP) to $812 billion in 2006 (6.2 percent of GDP), although it fell a bit in the first quarter of this year, to $770 billion at an annual rate.  The U.S. current account deficit is certainly not sustainable at its current level.  Globally, national current account deficits and surpluses must balance out, as deficit countries can raise funds in international capital markets only to the extent that other (surplus) countries provide those funds.  In China, rates of both saving and investment rose, but saving rates rose more, leading to an increase in that country's current account surplus of about $60 billion.  Outside of developing Asia, oil exporters in the Middle East and the former Soviet Union were also important contributors to the large increase in emerging-market current account balances.  The combined current accounts of the two regions increased from a surplus of $20 billion in 1996 to a surplus of $162 billion in 2004, an increase of about $140 billion. 

 

Current Account Balances (Billions of U.S. dollars)

 

Country or region

1996

2000

2004

2005

2006

Industrial

31.1

-304.7

-296.5

-502.5

-607.3

    United States

-124.8

-417.4

-640.2

-754.8

-811.5

    Japan

65.7

119.6

172.1

165.7

170.4

 

    Euro area 

77.3

-37.0

115.0

22.2

-11.1

        France

23.4

22.3

10.5

-19.5

-28.3

        Germany

-14.0

-32.6

118.0

128.4

146.4

        Italy

36.8

-6.2

-15.5

-28.4

-41.6

        Spain

-1.4

-23.1

-54.9

-83.0

-108.0

 

    Other

12.9

30.0

56.6

64.4

45.0

        Australia

-15.4

-14.9

-38.5

-41.2

-40.9

        Canada

3.4

19.7

21.3

26.3

21.5

        Switzerland

22.0

30.7

50.4

61.4

69.8

        United Kingdom

-10.5

-37.6

-35.4

-53.7

-88.3

 

    Memo:
        Industrial excl.
        United States

155.9

112.7

343.7

252.3

204.2

 

Developing

-82.8

124.7

296.5

507.9

643.2

    Asia

-40.2

77.0

172.4

245.1

352.1

        China

7.2

20.5

68.7

160.8

249.9

        Hong Kong

-4.0

7.0

15.7

20.3

20.6

        Korea

-23.1

12.3

28.2

15.0

6.1

        Taiwan

10.9

8.9

18.5

16.0

24.7

        Thailand

-14.4

9.3

2.8

-7.9

3.2

 

    Latin America

-39.1

-48.1

20.4

34.6

48.7

        Argentina

-6.8

-9.0

3.2

3.5

5.2

        Brazil

-23.5

-24.2

11.7

14.2

13.6

        Mexico

-2.5

-18.7

-6.7

-4.9

-1.5

 

    Middle East

15.1

72.1

99.2

189.0

212.4

    Africa

-5.2

7.2

0.6

14.6

19.9

    Eastern Europe

-18.5

-31.8

-58.6

-63.2

-88.9

    Former Soviet Union

5.2

48.3

62.6

87.7

99.0

 

    Memo:
        Developing Asia
        excl. China

-47.4

56.5

103.7

84.3

102.2

 

Statistical discrepancy

-51.6

-180.0

0.0

5.4

35.9

 

27. Real exports picked up in the second quarter, increasing 7.6 percent after increasing 1.1 percent. Exports of goods accelerated and contributed 5.10 percentage points to growth in real exports of goods and services. The acceleration reflected upturns in industrial supplies and materials and in nonautomotive capital goods and accelerations in automotive vehicles, engines, and parts and in foods, feeds, and beverages. In contrast, “other” exports turned down, and nonautomotive consumer goods slowed. Exports of services accelerated, mainly reflecting accelerations in other private services and in travel services. Passenger fares turned up. Real imports turned down, decreasing 3.2 percent after increasing 3.9 percent. Imports of goods turned down, mainly reflecting downturns in petroleum and products, in nonautomotive consumer goods, and in other imports. Nonautomotive capital goods decelerated, largely because of a downturn in imports of computers, peripherals, and parts. In contrast, imports of industrial supplies and materials turned up. Imports of services turned down, primarily reflecting a larger decrease in travel services and downturns in direct defense expenditures and in passenger fares.

 

28. The U.S. trade deficit declined slightly in July as record exports of farm goods, autos and other products offset a big jump in foreign oil prices. The deficit with China hit the second-highest level ever, reflecting strong demand for Chinese-made goods despite a string of high-profile recalls. The Commerce Department that the trade deficit edged down 0.3 percent in July to $59.2 billion (euro42.91 billion), compared with $59.4 billion (euro43.06 billion) the month before.  So far this year, the deficit is running at an annual rate of $711 billion (euro515.4 billion), down from $758.5 billion (euro549.84 billion) in 2006. Economists believe the trade balance will finally shrink this year after setting five consecutive records as American exporters benefit from strong economic growth in many countries overseas and a weaker dollar against many currencies. That makes U.S. products cheaper on foreign markets and imports more expensive for American consumers.

 

29. After nearly half a year of recalls from China, more Americans are left to wonder how and where they can find products made and grown in the USA.  Retailers must make an effort to sell American products to American consumers.  With the devaluation and appreciation of the Euro and Chinese yuan American made goods should be cheaper and easier to sell in both domestic and foreign markets.  The USA should appreciate Latin American currencies, particularly the Mexican peso.  The USA must care for their labor and redress the housing market with a decisive ARM Ban. In 2007 the USA managed to beat the trillion dollar account deficit, defined as the sum of the budget and international trade deficits.   Since 2004 the account deficit has been over a trillion dollars.  In 2004 it was –$1077 billion, in 2005 –$1183 billion, in 2006 the trade deficit began to decline at the end of the year to –$1007 billion, this 2007 it is down to an estimated –$868 billion.   The trade deficit has declined to a lucky -$711 billion and the budget deficit is estimated between -$150 and -$200 billion wherefore the account deficit is between -$861 and -$911 billion.  The US became aware of the trillion dollar account deficit in 2006, although for all their complaints, neither the Fed or ECOSOC have done the math, and resolved to Buy American Goods HA-1-12-06, succeeding in bringing the account deficit below one trillion dollars.  This is sustainable development.  

 

Balancing the Trillion Dollar Account Deficit in billions 2000 – 2010 with HA 2007-2010

 

Table 1-1

Int’l

Def

OASI

Rev

Exp

 Fed Sav

Int. Trade

Acct Def

Debt

GDP

2000

12

294.50

411.68

2,025

1,788

87

-452

-365

5,628

9,719

2001

14

305.50

434.06

1,991

1,860

-33

-427

-460

5,770

10,022

2002

15

349.56

440.54

1,853

2,011

-317

-483

-800

6,198

10,339

2003

35

388.87

447.81

1,782

2,157

-375

-547

-922

6,780

10,828

2004

15

437.12

457.12

1,880

2,292

-412

-665

-1077

7,355

11,552

2005

17

444.07

479.89

2,052

2,479

-400

-783

-1183

8,058

12,227

2006

25

470

507.09

2,407

2,655

-248

-759

-1007

8,451

13,065

2007

30

463

537.85

2,577

2,771

-158

-711

-868

8,899

13,721

2008

35

485.2

568.09

2,771

2,925

-155

 

 

9,364

14,401

2009

40

505.3

599.95

2,855

3,071

-215

 

 

9,905

15,120

2010

50

515.3

635.31

2,950

3,071

-255

 

 

10,501

15,881

HA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2007

50

450

422.6

2,577

2,550

27

-711

-679

8,890

13,721

2008

65

400

493.5

2,771

2,663

108

-700

-562

8,700

14,401

2009

75

375

511.5

2,855

2,710

145

-625

-445

8,650

15,120

2010

90

390

531.7

2,950

2,825

125

-500

-335

8,500

15,881

 

Source: CBO, BEA and HA

 

30. The US has succeeded in bringing the account deficit below one trillion dollars but the budget and international trade continue present a significant challenge to economists and lawmakers.  The US must continue to make progress in import substitution and government budgeting.  Deficits are not acceptable.  The President must propose a balanced budget in the beginning of the year and Congress shall enforce spending limits and deficit targets.  To balance the budget the military and social security will have to bear the brunt of cut-backs whereas they are the accounts with the largest surplus.  Social security will solvent until 2017 when taxes would begin to rise and largely transparent  but uncooperative and must be held to a pay as you go strategy and obligated to return up to half of their un-administrated profits.  Medicare needs to improve their oversight of unnecessary and excessive treatment and restrain the annual inflation of health care costs to no more than 3% to earn a raise in the tax rate from 2.9 to 3.0%.  The military needs the fiscal discipline imposed by the goal of $400 billion annual spending to continue making progress and must return surplus funds in excess of 25% reserve to the treasury.  The HA budget is balanced and presides over the end of year negotiations of a Congress that is victorious against the trillion deficit.  The international trade balance is reliant upon liberty from injustice, persecution and discrimination against US nationals all we need to do is love our fellow Americans and the fruits of their labor and balance will be restored.      

 

Bibliography



1. Aversa, Jeanne. Federal Deficit Down to $157.3 Billion. AP. Washington. 11 August 2008

2. Badiali, Matt. America to Stop all Oil Imports from the Middle East. Stansberry & Associates. 2006

3. Budget Accomplishments of the 110th Congress Thus Far. An August Recess Packet. August 2, 2007

4. BEA. Personal Income and Outlays. 31 August 2007. BEA 07-39

5. BEA Survey of Current Business. September 2007. Vol. 87 No. 9

6. Chairman Ben S. Bernanke. Global Imbalances: Recent Developments and Prospects. At the Bundesbank Lecture, Berlin, Germany. September 11, 2007

7. Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights 42USC§1983

8. CBO The Budget and Economic Outlook: An Update. August 2007

9. Crutsinger, Martin. Fed Expected to Cut Key Interest Rate. AP. 18 September 2007

10. Crutsinger, Martin. Trade Deficit Declines in July. AP. Washington. 11 September 2007

11. Crutsinger, Martin. Wholesale Prices Fall by 1.4 Percent. AP. 18 September 2007

12. DoD. Table 1-2 National Defense Budget Estimates FY 2007 March 2006

13. Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA)

14. End of Fiscal Year 1USC(2)§105

15. Enforcing deficit targets 2USC(20)I§903

16. Enforcement of Spending Limiting 2USC(20)§901

17. Erpenbeck v. US S.D. Ohio. US.6th Cir. No. 04-3456&7

18. Federal Reserve’s Monetary Policy Report to the Congress. 18 July 2007

19. FRB. Statistical Supplement to the Federal Reserve Bulletin, April 2007, 1.54

20. Governor Frederic S. Mishkin. Outlook and Risks for the US Economy. To the Money Marketeers of New York University, New York, New York. September 10, 2007

21. Hagenbaugh, Barbara.  Food Costs Take Bigger Bite out of Budget. USA Today. 19 June 2007

22. Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (JGTRRA)

23. Laundering monetary instruments under 18USCI(95)§1956

24. Madelein, Read. Stocks Higher Ahead of Fed Decision. AP. 18 September 2007

25. Moulson, Geir. Dollar Sinks to New Low. AP. Berlin. 12 September 2007

26. Manuel Antonio Noriega v. United States of America HA-9-9-07

27. Office of Management and Budget Historic Budget Tables

28. Pay as you go 2USC(20)I§902 

29. Resolved by the Senate with the House of Representatives concurring in S.CON.RES.21.ES 23 March 2007

30. Revising the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2007, establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2008, and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2009 through 2012. H. CON. RES. 99 29 March 2007

31. Sanders, Tony J. Adjustable Rate Mortgage (ARM) Ban. HA-10-5-07

32. Sanders, Tony J. $1 trillion Balanced Account Deficit (BAD). HA-26-9-06

32. Sanders, Tony J. Health and Welfare. Chapter 3. HA-17-6-07

33. Sanders, Tony J. Lobbying Activity Disclosure. HA-1-1-07

34. Sanders, Tony J. Military Economics HA-27-5-07

35. Sanders, Tony J. Tax Return Estimate: $300 billion HA-19-4-07

36. Sanders v. Astrue HA-3-6-7

37. SSA. SSI income exemptions. 2007

38. 2007 OASDI Trustees Report

39. Veiga, Alex. Foreclosures More than Double in Year. AP. 18 September 2007 

40. Wilen, John. Oil Prices Waver Ahead of Fed Meeting. AP. 18 September 2007

41. WTO. Annual Report. 2007