Hospitals & Asylums
To release Manuel Noriega to the custody of Panama as
decreed 9-9-07
Be it enacted in the House and Senate, Assembled, Referred
to the House Judiciary Committee to Ensure that there is an Error Free
Extradition Treaty with Panama and Timely Service Upon the
US Supreme Court, US 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, Ohio
Supreme Court, Canadian Supreme Court, Google Inc. and Panamanian Consulate
Manuel Antonio Noriega ID 38699-079
v. United States of America HA-9-9-07
Amices Brief in Pursuit of Panamanian Ambassadorial Service
under Art. 36 of Vienna
Convention on Consular Relations of 1963
Laws
Art. 2
Section 4 and Art. 3 Section 3 of the US Constitution
Basic Principles for the
Treatment of Prisoners 1990
Cheney, Richard B. & Lynne V. Kings
of the Hill. Simon & Schuster. Touchstone. 1983, 1996
Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights 42USC§1983
Conspiracy to commit offense or to
defraud United States 18USC§371
Conspiracy
to defraud the Government with respect to claims 18USC§286
Extradition
Treaty with Panama, 1905
Fraud and related activity in connection with computers under 18USC§1030
Immunity of Witnesses Generally 18USC§6002
International Bar Association ICC
Monitoring and Outreach Programme HA-27-6-06
International Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment A/39/51, 1984
Jose Antonio Ocampo v. Luis
Moreno-Ocampo HA-22-6-06
Leslie Anderson v. United States of America and The
Minister of Justice (Ont.) (Criminal) (By Leave) No. 31932
Lloyd Prudenza and David Dalglish v. United States of
America, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada (Ont.)
(Criminal) (By Leave) No. 31696
Locally
Tampered Evidence/With Harry Whittington v. Dick Cheney HA-20-2-06
Locally
Synchronized Perjury Evident in Appendix C of the Brief State Response Sanders HA-27-7-07
Menu
Foods Recall HA-26-3-07
Sanders, Tony J.
Drug Administration (DA).
Hospitals & Asylums. Chapter 8. 6th Draft. 8 August 2007
Sanders, Tony J.
Model Rules for Community Corrections (MRCC). Hospitals &
Asylums. Chapter 6. 4th Draft. 7 August 2007
Prosecutor
v. Milosevic HA-25-12-04
Standard
Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners 1955-77
State v. Sanders NO. C-070527
Syl Apps Secure Treatment Centre v. B.D., 2007 SCC 38 July 27
Termination
of War Contracts 41USC(2)101
Third Geneva Convention
relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War of 12 August 1949
Treaty
with Panama on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters, 1991
US v. Erpenbeck US.6th Cir. No. 04-3456&7
Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 1963
1. The release of Manuel Noriega is not the victory for
justice we had all hoped that it would be but a battle with corruption we hope
to win decisively in Congress. Noreiga's Attorney Frank Rubino said he would
appeal. The recent decision of the
District Court to send Noriega to France is based upon faulty law and
bold-faced corruption. The judges mentioned in this case embarked upon on
a conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud the United States 18USC§371. Evidence indicates that a conspiracy to
defraud the Government with respect to claims did occur in contravention to 18USC§286. The end of August was blighted with perjury,
a judicial treason in contravention to Art. 3(3) after an unjust war in
contravention to Art. 2(4), that must be prosecuted by the Court and Congress
to terminate all fraudulent war contracts remaining from Operation Just Cause
under 41USC(2)101(f).
2. First let me
introduce myself as a witness, in need of protection, denied immunity from the
disease of prosecution as the result of a loophole in the immunity of witness
in general under 18USC§6002
that Congress should consider amending to punish perjury such as that recently
committed by Presiding Judge Painter of the Ohio 1st Judicial
District Court of Appeals, whose signature was illegible, as noted in Appendix
C State Response of State v. Sanders NO. C-070527 at pg. 61. The perjury occurred in the form of a
spurious entry failing to expunge a
traffic misdemeanor after seven years without so much as reading the brief or dismissing
the case properly, hiring a bio-terrorist as is his want infringing as he is
upon the trademark and email of the Centers for Medicare, Medicaid with the
Court Computer Management System CMS v. CMS a flagrant Solicitation to commit a
crime of violence 18USC§ 373. Fraud and related activity in connection
with computers under 18USC§1030
occurred at now repaired page 690 of the Model Rules for Community Corrections
(MRCC) pertaining to
the prohibition of refouler and torture and Harry Whittington v. Dick Cheney HA-20-2-06 that includes claims for both Manuel Noriega
and Harry Whittington. This tampering
with evidence indicates that the local Ohio Appeals Court has joined the
Florida and French speaking judges to defraud the United States of their
judgment. The reasonable justice would
accept the secretly censured or dysfunctional “.cms” email address of the
Appeals Court advertised in their local rules as admission of guilt and see
that my seven year old, falsified, traffic conviction is expunged and that I
and the Court are redressed as the Court could not find it in themselves to do
in 2000, see Appendix A at pg. 45.
3. Now let me introduce the case of Drug
Administration at §314a(B). On February 4, 1988, a grand jury in Miami,
Florida, indicted General Noriega for crimes associated with drug trafficking
while a CIA agent and high ranking officer in Panama. The Inter-American
Commission on Human Rights received a number of complaints regarding the
suspension of human rights and visited Panama between February 27 and March 3,
1989. On May 7, 1989 the Panamanian elections annulled by the Electoral
Tribunal. By the fall of 1989, the Noriega regime
was barely clinging to power. Tensions increased when election results were
voided and opposition leaders were physically beaten by Noriega's Dignity
Battalions (DIGBATs). On 15 December
1989, the National Assembly of Panama declared that a state of war existed with
the U.S. and adopted measures to confront foreign aggression. On 20 December 27,684 U.S.
troops and over 300 aircraft confronted the 3,000 Panamanian Defense Force. The Organization of American States
condemned the action. On July 19, 1990
a group of 60 companies based in Panama filed a lawsuit against the United
States Government in Federal District Court in New York City alleging that the
U. S. action against Panama was "done in a tortious, careless and
negligent manner with disregard for the property of innocent Panamanian
residents". About 2,700 families
that were displaced by the Chorrillo fire were each given $6,500 by the United
States to build a new house or apartment in selected areas in or near the
city. In Operation Just Cause 23 US service members were killed,
18 from the Army, 4 from the Navy and one from the Marine Corp and 324 wounded
in action there were an estimated 516 to 4,000 Panamanian casualties.
4. Noriega contends that under the
Geneva Conventions, a POW must be returned home after hostilities have ceased
-- in his case, more than 20 years ago. Noriega was convicted in absentia in
Panama on charges of embezzlement, corruption and murdering political opponents
and sentenced to 60 years, but he could wind up serving only a fraction of that
time or even get house arrest under Panamanian law under the Treaty
with Panama on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters, 1991 and Extradition
Treaty with Panama, 1905 and Art. XI (2,4) Panama Canal Treaty of 1977
not to mention the Basic
Principles for the Treatment of Prisoners 1990, Body of Principles for
the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment 1988
and Standard Minimum
Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners 1955-77. As a prisoner of war
Noriega is entitled to be repatriated to his home country after the cessation
of hostilities under Art. 118 of the Third Geneva Convention
relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War of 12 August 1949 that States, “Prisoners of war shall
be released and repatriated without delay after the cessation of active
hostilities.” Magistrate Turnoff in is
in error to say that this right does not exist under the Geneva Conventions.
Noriega's detention was in fact a violation of the Art. XI (2,4) Panama Canal Treaty of 1977
that confers all jurisdiction of criminal justice functions regarding
Panamanians to Panama to which the USA was party at the time of arrest.
5. US Magistrate Judge William Turnoff's did commit perjury on Tuesday August 28, 2007 by saying "The rights asserted by General Noriega simply do not exist under the Geneva Conventions." by making the decision to cause Manuel Noriega to face extradition to France for a trial regarding the alleged laundering of $3 million of drug revenues including the purchase of a Paris apartment. Noriega was convicted in France on the money laundering charges while he was jailed in the U.S., but the French government agreed to a new trial if he was extradited, according to court documents. The ruling was based in part upon that of Senior Judge William Hoeveler that found Noriega to be a POW and this does not render Noriega immune from extradition to foreign counties for other crimes. Panama has filed an extradition request but has not actively pursued it, Hoeveler said in his ruling that also perjures. Federal prosecutors say POWs that have pending criminal charges must face them, or be sent to a third country that has a legitimate extradition treaty with the U.S., such as France. This decision was a flagrant deprivation of rights under Color of Law 18USC(13)§242 aggravated by reason of kidnapping to a class A felony. The United States is therefore liable to Noriega for a civil action for the deprivation of rights to redress the violation of the declaratory decree releasing Mr. Noriega on September 9 2007 under 42USC§1983. The federal penitentiary in Florida is certainly very troubled. A representative of the US DOJ Inspector General was shot to death by a prison guard he was arresting. An unregistered prisoner convicted of dubious bank fraud charges in the Southern District of Ohio, that claims full responsibility, is reported to have been illegally trafficked to a federal prison in Florida in US v. Bill Erpenbeck US 6th Cir. No. 04-3456&7.
6.
France's claim upon Noriega is weak, and corrupt. France obviously seized
these assets of Noriega on the conjecture that it was illicit drug money, and
one might add corrupt influence of the detaining power, and under their
Constitution is responsible for the return of these seized assets. But
no, instead France also wants to torture Noriega on false drug charges that do
not amount to war crimes and fail under the statute of limitations.
Allegations of corruption, abuse of process and torture must leveled
against the French thieves whose claim to neutrality fails not only under a
theory of stolen goods but also under the statute of limitations for petty breeches
of law not involving murder and their bad taste in law, the most corrupt
criminal justice has to provide, drugs. Does this give the French a
right to also slave and torture the body of Mr. Noriega? No, it gives
Noriega the right to sue for the return of his property. How are
lawsuits fought in the EU? In the jail cell with the
torturous toxins of drug enforcement officers or in writing like
civilized nations? Evidence indicates that international European
jails are not safe for war criminals whereas my last two cases
were murdered in 2006 for political reasons and all the European Court of
Justice did is rob Google in my honor as noted in the International Bar
Association ICC Monitoring and Outreach Programme HA-27-6-06, Jose Antonio
Ocampo v. Luis Moreno-Ocampo HA-22-6-06, and Prosecutor v. Milosevic HA-25-12-04. The question the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals
is sought to certify to France upon the information of Google’s lawyers is,
should Google’s millions be returned to the US firm?
7. Two cases have been brought before the Canadian Supreme Court, Lloyd Prudenza and David Dalglish v. United States of America, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada (Ont.) (Criminal) (By Leave) No. 31696 and Leslie Anderson v. United States of America and The Minister of Justice (Ont.) (Criminal) (By Leave) No. 31932. It should be noted that Ontario has a lengthy history of offenses against the United States documented in the Menu Foods Recall HA-26-3-07. There is also evidence of politicization of these cases in the form of a television commercial where a new cow with a Canadian accent is ridiculed as being mad by a herd of California cows who have never heard of snow. Ontario is reported to be the richest of Canadian provinces but if the Supreme Court is to be believed despite their most recent 66 paragraph judgment in Syl Apps Secure Treatment Centre v. B.D., 2007 SCC 38 July 27 that indicates a prejudice at the Supreme Court, is also the most corrupt, recently claiming the life of a former justice. What seems to have happened is that the rich Ontario judges have tricked the United States into trading a greater than $7 million settlement for a few slaves.
8. The US must not be robbed by French speaking thieves taking unfair advantage of our national weakness for slavery. While torture is not evident in Noriega’s detention in Florida where people are generally gunned down when inspecting prisons, to make a political statement, it is in the case of the author who is suffering a new slow acting pain in the ass that is not very responsive to Advil. The un-redressed torture causing death in the UN war tribunals in the European Union rule out extradition of Manuel Noriega to Europe whereas there is obviously a conspiracy regarding claims surrounding the wrongful deaths of the innocent Milan Babic and Slobodan Milosevic whose parents both committed suicide. Under the International Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment A/39/51 (1984) no State shall expel, return ("refouler") or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture. The US border is hereby secured against three flagrante delictos by two French speaking countries who we pray will return money stolen from US nationals.
9. The arrest and detention of Manuel Noriega was a serious
failure of our international system of justice that amounts to
cruel and unusual punishment and treatment that has led to a dangerous fad and
proliferation of international criminal tribunals who have seized the
United Nations. The defense of Manuel Noriega must be very vigorous. Only Panama has a
valid case for extradition after this lengthy and unjust period of time under
statute of limitations because the Panamanian case involves murder of
Panamanians by a Panamanian. Furthermore whereas Noriega is a Panamanian
national, a former President, he is entitled to return to his homeland, to be
near his family. Panama must be permitted to protect their cultural
heritage and their entire consular staff and Parliament have the duty to see
the safe return of their former dictator to their historians. Panama's
ambassadors and lawyers are directed to communicate with Mr. Noriega in federal
prison at Miami FCI, 15801 S.W. 137th Ave., Miami, FL 33177
(305) 259-2100 for procedural direction under Art. 36 of Vienna
Convention on Consular Relations of 1963.
Sanders,
Tony J.