Hospitals & Asylums  

 

Welcome

Atlas

Statute

 

Economic Stimulus Package HA-20-1-08

 

By Tony Sanders

 

 

Introduction / Economic Growth Overview / Balance of Payments / Balanced Budget / Conclusion / Bibliography

 

II. Balance of Payments

 

21. The U.S. current international trade account deficit, that began in the 1970s, expanded sharply in the latter part of the 1990s and the first half of the present decade.  In 1996, the U.S. deficit was $125 billion, or 1.6 percent of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP); by 2004, it had grown to $640 billion, or 5.5 percent of GDP.  The U.S. current account deficit has widened further in the past two years.  The international trade deficit rose from $640 billion in 2004 (5.5 percent of GDP) to $812 billion in 2006 (6.2 percent of GDP), although it fell a bit in the first quarter of this year, to $770 billion at an annual rate.  In 2007 the USA beat the trillion dollar account deficit.  Not even the most pessimistic reports of the President dispute this fact.  An account deficit is defined as the sum of the budget and international trade deficit in goods.  More obscure methods, such as calculating the international trade in services, result in different figures.  Since 2004 the account deficit has been over a trillion dollars.  In 2004 it was -$1,077 billion, in 2005 -$1,183 billion, in 2006 the account deficit began to decline at the end of the year to -$1,007 billion, this 2007 it is down to an estimated - $964 billion.   Preliminary estimates for the trade deficit in 2007 are around -$789 billion; a slight increase over 2006 deficit of -$759 billion that actually improved on the -783 billion of 2005.  Final figures for 2007 could be much lower.  The budget deficit is estimated between -$150 and -$205 billion, down from a high of -$400 billion in 2005.  Wherefore the account deficit for 2007 is estimated between -$900 and -$999 billion - at -$964 billion. 

 

US International Trade Estimates by Quarter 2007

 

 

2007

2007/ Q1

2007/ Q2

2007/Q3

2007/4Q est.

Goods Balance

-789

-201

-202

-196

-190

Exports Goods

1,147

270

279

298

300

Imports Goods

-1,936

-471

-481

-494

-490

Source: BEA

 

22. The Dow, the S&P and the Nasdaq all tumbled during the fourth quarter and are down several percentage points so far for 2008.  The Dow Jones industrial average was down 1.51 percent, the Standard & Poor's 500 index was down 0.75 percent, and the Nasdaq composite index was down 2.58 percent (Read 2008).  Real exports picked up in the second quarter, increasing 7.6 percent after increasing 1.1 percent. Exports of goods accelerated and contributed 5.10 percentage points to growth in real exports of goods and services. The acceleration reflected upturns in industrial supplies and materials and in nonautomotive capital goods and accelerations in automotive vehicles, engines, and parts and in foods, feeds, and beverages. In contrast, “other: exports turned down, and nonautomotive consumer goods slowed. Exports of services accelerated, mainly reflecting accelerations in other private services and in travel services. Passenger fares turned up. Real imports turned down, decreasing 3.2 percent after increasing 3.9 percent. The U.S. trade deficit declined slightly in July as record exports of farm goods, autos and other products offset a big jump in foreign oil prices.  The trade deficit edged down 0.3 percent in July to $59.2 billion (euro42.91 billion), compared with $59.4 billion (euro43.06 billion) the month before.  For much of the year the deficit ran at an annual rate of $711 billion (euro515.4 billion), down from $758.5 billion (euro549.84 billion) in 2006. The end of the year was however expensive as the result of the spike in oil prices. Economists believe the trade balance will finally shrink this year after setting five consecutive records as American exporters benefit from strong economic growth in many countries overseas and a weaker dollar against many currencies. That makes U.S. products cheaper on foreign markets and imports more expensive for American consumers (Commerce Department 2007).

 

Balance of US International Trade in Goods and Service 1970-2006

 

 

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Total Balance

4

16

-13

-115

-78

-92

-380

-495

-611

-716

-794

 

Goods Balance

4

11

-23

-121

-111

-174

-460

-547

-665

-783

-838

-789

Services Balance

30

5

10

6

34

83

-80

52

54

66

80

 

Total Exports

60

139

281

302

552

812

1,096

1,016

1,152

1,275

1,446

 

Exports Goods

45

110

226

222

397

583

784

713

808

895

1,023

1,147

Exports Services

15

29

55

80

156

229

312

303

344

381

423

 

Total Imports

-56

-123

-294

-417

-630

-904

-1,476

-1,511

-1,763

-1,992

-2,204

 

Imports Goods

-41

-99

-249

-343

-508

-757

-1,244

-1,261

-1,473

-1,677

-1,861

-1,936

Imports Services

-15

-24

-45

-74

-122

-146

-232

-250

-290

-315

-343

 

Source: BEA Foreign Transactions in the National Income and Product Accounts 1970-2006

 

Current Account Balances (Billions of U.S. dollars)

Country or region

1996

2000

2004

2005

2006

Industrial

31.1

-304.7

-296.5

-502.5

-607.3

    United States

-124.8

-417.4

-640.2

-754.8

-811.5

    Japan

65.7

119.6

172.1

165.7

170.4

 

    Euro area 

77.3

-37.0

115.0

22.2

-11.1

        France

23.4

22.3

10.5

-19.5

-28.3

        Germany

-14.0

-32.6

118.0

128.4

146.4

        Italy

36.8

-6.2

-15.5

-28.4

-41.6

        Spain

-1.4

-23.1

-54.9

-83.0

-108.0

 

    Other

12.9

30.0

56.6

64.4

45.0

        Australia

-15.4

-14.9

-38.5

-41.2

-40.9

        Canada

3.4

19.7

21.3

26.3

21.5

      Switzerland

22.0

30.7

50.4

61.4

69.8

        United Kingdom

-10.5

-37.6

-35.4

-53.7

-88.3

 

    Memo:
        Industrial excl.
        United States

155.9

112.7

343.7

252.3

204.2

 

Developing

-82.8

124.7

296.5

507.9

643.2

    Asia

-40.2

77.0

172.4

245.1

352.1

        China

7.2

20.5

68.7

160.8

249.9

        Hong Kong

-4.0

7.0

15.7

20.3

20.6

        Korea

-23.1

12.3

28.2

15.0

6.1

        Taiwan

10.9

8.9

18.5

16.0

24.7

        Thailand

-14.4

9.3

2.8

-7.9

3.2

 

    Latin America

-39.1

-48.1

20.4

34.6

48.7

        Argentina

-6.8

-9.0

3.2

3.5

5.2

        Brazil

-23.5

-24.2

11.7

14.2

13.6

        Mexico

-2.5

-18.7

-6.7

-4.9

-1.5

 

    Middle East

15.1

72.1

99.2

189.0

212.4

    Africa

-5.2

7.2

0.6

14.6

19.9

    Eastern Europe

-18.5

-31.8

-58.6

-63.2

-88.9

    Former Soviet Union

5.2

48.3

62.6

87.7

99.0

 

    Memo:
        Developing Asia
        excl. China

-47.4

56.5

103.7

84.3

102.2

 

Statistical discrepancy

-51.6

-180.0

0.0

5.4

35.9

23. The trade gap with China is expected to hit an all-time high above $250 billion this year. The imbalance has been blamed as contributing to loss of 3 million manufacturing jobs in the United States since 2000.  American manufacturers contend that the yuan is undervalued by as much as 40 percent against the dollar, making Chinese products cheaper in this country and U.S. goods costlier in China.  China modified its currency system in July 2005. Since then, the yuan has risen in value by 12.1 percent. That, however, is far less than what U.S. manufacturers say is needed to address the trade gap.  The U.S. deficit with China was $233 billion in 2006, America’s largest ever with a single country. It is on track to surpass that amount this year, perhaps topping $250 billion even though some Chinese products have been the subject of high-profile recalls. That included unsafe tires and toys with lead paint (Crutsinger 2007). In China, rates of both saving and investment rose, but saving rates rose more, leading to an increase in that country's current account surplus of about $60 billion.  Outside of developing Asia, oil exporters in the Middle East and the former Soviet Union were also important contributors to the large increase in emerging-market current account balances.  The combined current accounts of the two regions increased from a surplus of $20 billion in 1996 to a surplus of $162 billion in 2004, an increase of about $140 billion. The total value of import duties was $19.9 billion.  (Stewart, Stone & Streitwiser 2007)

 

24. In the US service economy only 0.7% are still engaged in farming, forestry, and fishing, 22.9% in manufacturing, extraction, transportation, and crafts, and 34.7% in managerial, professional, and technical, 25.4% in sales and office and 16.3% in other services. 

 

The manufacturing index of the Institute for Supply Management registered 47.7 in December 2007, down 3.1 percentage points from the 50.8 in November 2007. A reading above 50 indicates growth; below that level indicates contraction.  December 2007 was the first month that manufacturing failed to grow since January 2007, when the index was 49.3. It has been four years and eight months since the index was lower, when it hit 46.4 in April 2003. The Dow Jones industrials fell more than 160 points in the beginning of the year and continues to open several hundred points down from 2007 (Tong 2008). 

 

In 2005 manufacturing employed 14.3 million workers in the United States and another 6 million in related industries such as wholesaling and finance. Nearly 3 million jobs were lost between 2000 and 2003. In 2005, the U.S. manufacturing sector, in terms of GDP, was close to $1.5 trillion. U.S. manufacturers exported $782 billion of goods overseas in 2005, or nearly two-thirds of total exports. Nearly 40 percent of exports go to neighboring NAFTA countries (NAM 2005).

 

The US Census Bureau reported that in the USA there are as estimated 438,301 wholesalers employing 6 million employees with a payroll of $255 billion and shipments totalling $4.376 trillion.  The retail trade has 1,115,902 establishments employing 15 million employees with a payroll of $307 billion and sales totalling $3.173 trillion (US Census 2006).  A third of the internatioal trade deficit can be attributed to to oil alone.  In 2005 the US exported $22.7 billion and imported $251.9 billion in petroleum for a trade deficit of –229.2 billion in petroleum alone (US Census, BEA 2006). 

 

Private goods-producing industries accounted for about 18 percent of the US economy, compared with about 21 percent in 1997. Private services-producing industries accounted for about 69 percent of GDP in 2002, compared with about 66 percent in 1997. Government’s share of GDP was 13 percent in 2002, unchanged from 1997. Health care-related services industries maintained their share of GDP at 6 percent in 2002. Hospitals value added increased about 44 percent; nursing and residential care facilities value added increased about 48 percent. At the same time, pharmaceutical and medicine manufacturing value added grew about 78 percent. The average increase across all industries was 28 percent. Electronic information-based industries accounted for less than 1 percent of total GDP and about 11 percent of the information sector’s value added.

 

The 2002 accounts are the first to provide detailed information on electronic shopping, electronic auctions, Web search portals, Internet service providers, and Internet publishing and broadcasting as well as data on the interactions between the Internet industries and all other industries. Private goods-producing industries accounted for 28 percent of gross output, compared with 33 percent in 1997. Private services-producing industries accounted for 61 percent of the total, compared with 59 percent in 1997.

 

Government gross output accounted for the remaining 11 percent in 2002, up from 8 percent in 1997. Intermediate purchases of materials and services were about $9 trillion, with 39 percent purchased by private goods-producing industries, 51 percent purchased by private services-producing industries, and the remaining 10 percent purchased by government.  On average, intermediate purchases of materials, energy, and services accounted for 44 cents of each dollar of gross output.  Value added accounted for the remaining 56 cents (compensation accounted for 32 cents, taxes on production and imports less subsidies for 4 cents, and gross operating surplus for 20 cents). This distribution was virtually unchanged from 1987 (Stewart, Stone & Streitwieser 2007).

 

25. The WTO 2007 draft text on Anti-dumping, subsidies and countervailing measures and fisheries subsidies addresses all aspects of paragraph 28 of the Doha Declaration., anti-dumping, subsidies and countervailing measures and fisheries subsidies.  A product is to be considered as being dumped if it is introduced into the commerce of another country at less than its normal value.  A determination of injury for purposes shall be based on positive evidence of an objective examination of both (a) the volume of the dumped imports and (b) the effect of the dumped imports on prices in the domestic market for like products. A subsidy shall be deemed to exist if there is a financial contribution by a government or any public body.  Except as provided in the Agreement on Agriculture, subsidies contingent, upon the use of domestic over imported goods, shall be prohibited.  Assistance for research activities conducted by firms or by higher education or research establishments on a contract basis with firms if the assistance covers not more than 75 per cent of the costs of industrial research or 50 per cent of the costs of pre‑competitive development activity, shall be considered non‑actionable, to the prohibition of subsidies. Subsidies, the benefits of which are conferred on any vessel engaged in illegal, unreported or unregulated fishing are prohibited. Subsidies exclusively for improving fishing or service vessel and crew safety shall not be prohibited under the Fish Stocks Agreement, the Code of Conduct, the Compliance Agreement.  It is remarkable that international trade is becoming regulated under a single set of rules whose scope is continuously expanding.

 

26. The benefits of the development of standardization for enhancing the liquidity of financial markets have a long history. One particularly clear example dates back to the development of exchange-traded commodities futures contracts in the mid-1800s. The standardization of the futures markets improved the flow of information to market participants, reducing transaction costs and fostering the emergence of liquid markets. In the early days of the Chicago Board of Trade, in the mid-1850s, standardization took the form of creating “grades” or quality categories for commodities to break the link between ownership rights and specific lots of a physical commodity. In effect, standardization and related controls reduced trader information requirements and, thus, their transaction costs. In 1865, the Chicago Board of Trade standardized the delivery dates for the contracts, thus fostering the emergence of liquid markets in which traders could readily hedge the risk of price changes in the commodities and contracts. A final step toward standardization came years later with the adoption of the clearinghouse for the exchange as the common counterparty to all of the contracts traded on the exchange. The benefits of standardization can be realized not only on organized exchanges but also in over-the-counter markets. Standardization reduces uncertainty about the instruments, which lowers transaction costs and facilitates price discovery and market liquidity (Krosner 2007).

 

Year

Petroleum

Balance

Exports

Imports

2003

-120,402

12,693

-133,095

2004

-163,378

17,082

-180,460

2005

-229,191

22,664

-251,856

2006

-278,000

22,000

-300,000

27. President Bush urged OPEC nations to put more oil on the world market and warned that soaring prices could cause an economic slowdown in the United States.  A barrel of light, sweet crude surpassed $100 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.  The World Bank predicts that oil prices are likely to decline gradually as record crude prices weaken demand so that a barrel of crude oil will cost $84.10 on average in 2008 and fall by 6.8 percent to $78.40 a barrel in 2009. It estimates that the average price of crude oil in 2007 was $71.20 a barrel. If you look at the fundamentals, there is scope for lower oil prices. The World Bank forecasts more or less a sustained, gradual decline in the price of oil (Wong 2008).  The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries next meets Feb. 1 in Vienna, Austria, to consider increasing output. OPEC oil accounts for about 40 percent of the world's needs, and the Saudis account for 30 percent of the organizations product. Oil is commodity that requires investment, exploration, a lot of capital.  A lot of these oil producing countries are full out in terms of what they can produce.  In his petition to the Saudi King Adullah, President Bush declared,

 

“High energy prices can damage consuming economies.  Paying more for gasoline hurts some of the American families”. 

 

The Saudi oil minister, Ali Naimi, said,

 

“The U.S. economy is significant to the oil market and demand. I'm sure no one will look with pleasure on a recession in the U.S. On the contrary, all our effort is to maintain prosperity and growth in all countries, particularly the number one consuming nation in the world”.

 

But the minister said oil is not the only reason for the slowing U.S. economy.

 

"The concern for the U.S. economy is valid, but what affects the U.S. economy is more than the supply of oil.  The kingdom will raise oil production when the mnarket justified it.  Higher prices reflect supply and demand, and that there is little excess capacity in the marketplace”.

 

Bush retorted, “a growing demand for oil, especially from fast-growing India and China, is straining supply and lifting prices” (Hunt & Gearan 2008).

28. A special commission is urging the government to raise federal gasoline taxes by as much as 40 cents per gallon over five years as part of a sweeping overhaul designed to ease traffic congestion and repair the nation's decaying bridges and roads.  The two-year study by the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission, that is not yet public, recommended broad changes after the devastating bridge collapse in Minneapolis, which killed 13 people and injured about 100, to avoid future disasters.  Under the recommendation, the current tax of 18.4 cents per gallon for unleaded gasoline would be increased annually for five years - by anywhere from 5 cents to 8 cents each year - and then indexed to inflation afterward to help fix the infrastructure, expand public transit and highways as well as broaden railway and rural access to meet a growing demand for alternatives to congested highways.  The gas tax has not been increased since 1993, and recent efforts by Congress to raise it have faltered over the objections of the Bush administration. The tax increase being proposed is designed to take effect in 2009, after President Bush leaves office.  The 12-member commission's proposals, which are expected to cost $225 billion each year for the next 50 years, face internal division. The commission's chairwoman, Transportation Secretary Mary Peters, and two other members oppose gas tax increases and were issuing a dissenting opinion to the report calling instead for private-sector investment and tolls.  The two commissioners opposing a tax increase are Maria Cino, Peters' former deputy who is organizing the 2008 Republican National Convention, and Rick Geddes, a Cornell University professor who has served as a senior staff economist in the Bush administration on the President's Council of Economic Advisers (Yen 2008).

 

29. On average, the value of the dollar fell by 2.1 percent against the currencies of the United States’ major trading partners in 2007, and CBO expects declines of between 2 percent and 3 percent in 2008 (Wong 2008).  Real export growth, which has generally been strong since mid-2003, has been supported by strengthening economic activity in many foreign countries and by the substantial depreciation of the U.S. dollar against many foreign currencies since early 2002. In contrast, real import growth has generally weakened from its pre-2005 pace, responding to the relatively slower growth in U.S. gross domestic purchases as well as higher import prices arising from the depreciation of the dollar (Weinberg, Hanson, Howard 2008).   A weaker dollar will benefit both US exporters and developing countries with dollar debt interested in harnessing better technology. Rapid technological progress in developing nations has helped to reduce the proportion of people living in absolute poverty from 29 percent in 1990 to 18 percent in 2004. Technological progress increased 40-60 percent faster in developing countries than in rich countries between the early 1990s and early 2000s (Wong 2008).  The weaker dollar has the effect of decreasing US purchasing power, increasing markets for US goods and services.  The weaker dollar also gives rise to inflationary pressure as the result of national dependency upon oil.     

 

30. To be effective, in more cash strapped circumstances, the United States will need to reaffirm support for achieving the health and poverty related Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to maximize the use of their technological knowledge.  Despite a 34% reduction in global infant death rates between 1975 to 1995, huge improvements in immunization coverage for children less than one year old, from 20% to 80%, between 1980 and 1990, and improvement in population access to safe water and sanitation, health for all fell short of resolving health inequities (Kanchanachitra, Wibulpolprasert & Tangcharoensathien 2008).  Approximately $10 billion per year is needed to install low-cost water and sanitation services, and a further US$ 15 to 20 billion a year to maintain current levels of service and make improvements. To finance the cost of installation per-capita spending of $8 for water and $28 for sanitation is needed.   Developing countries in the WHO Western Pacific Region needs 48% of the total spending for water, followed by 28% for the WHO African Region. For sanitation the WHO Western Pacific Region and WHO South-East Asia require 30% of total spending each and the WHO African Region needs 24% (Hutton & Bartram 2008).  In 2005 the Global Immuni­zation Vision and Strategy (GIVS) aimed to reduce vaccine-preventable disease mortality and morbidity by two-thirds by 2015 compared to 2000.  About $ 25 billion is esti­mated to be available for vaccines, for the 2006–2015 period, of which 16% is projected to come from national governments, 15% from the GAVI Alliance and 40% from external donors. Between 30% and 40% of need is unmet, an annual shortfall of more than US$ 1 billion. By 2015, more than 70 million children in the world’s 72 poorest countries can be protected annually against 14 major childhood diseases if an additional US$ 1 billion per year that can be invested towards immunization to strengthen health systems and deliver other life-saving interventions such as those against malnutrition, malaria and intestinal worms (Wolfson 2008).

 

International Assistance 1990-2010


Source: OECD

 

31. The objective of the United Nations is to levy $1 trillion in official development assistance in the decade 2000-2010.  However 
after rising sharply from $70 billion in 2000 to $107 billion in 2005 ODA regressed to $105 billion in 2006 with lower projections 
for 2007 and recovery in 2008.  Donors, that have not already done so, are encouraged to establish timetables to achieve the 0.7 per 
cent target by no later than 2015, starting in 2006 and reaching 0.5 by 2009 and 0.7% by 2010.  To win export credit and debt relief 
the United States must improve their accounting of Official Development Assistance (ODA).  The United Nations does not appreciate 
American’s unique predisposition to contribute to private philanthropists.  Most nations negotiate with the government to target the 
allocation of tax dollars.  To maximize credit the US Congress must account for private international assistance so that the United 
Nations would accept it is as legitimate and the US would be on target to contribute 0.7% of GNI by 2010.  In 2006 the US is 
credited with contributing $20 billion, 0.18% of the GNI, the lowest of all industrialized nations.  In 2007 Setting forth the 
congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2008 and including the appropriate budgetary levels for 
fiscal years 2007 and 2009 through 2012 dramatically increased foreign assistance to $35 billion, 0.3% of the GNI.  Private donors 
contribute another $33 billion annually making this figure closer to 0.6% of the GNI.  If private donors would match government 
contributions and Congress would account for them, the US would be on target to achieve the goal of 0.7% by 2010.  This 
achievement would greatly improve consumer confidence in US products.
 

Public and Private US International Assistance Analyzed % of GDP and GNI 2006-2010

 

 

Public

Private

Comb

Ined

GDP

% of GDP

Com %

GNI

% of GNI

Com %

2006

25

33

58

12,907

0.19

0.45

11,655 

0.3

0.5

2007

35

35

70

13,617

0.24

0.56

12,200

0.33

0.57

2008

40

40

80

14,349

0.28

0.56

12,850

0.36

0.62

2009

45

45

90

15,111

0.29

0.6

13,250

0.39

0.68

2010

50

50

100

15,906

0.31

0.62

14,000

0.42

0.71

 

Introduction / Economic Growth Overview / Balance of Payments / Balanced Budget / Conclusion / Bibliography

 

Next