Hospitals & Asylums
July 2008
Dear Jury: The HA Statute has been
renumbered. I was paid nearly $50 to
participate in a jury last year. If you
are selected to be a jurist and don’t want to miss out on the opportunity to be
paid to go to trial, volunteer for the Grand Jury. Prospective jurists must be informed that the
jury has the right to decide both the facts and the law in their decision to
render a not guilty verdict. Judges
often intimidate defense attorneys from informing jurors of this power of jury
nullification of unjust laws. We must
therefore embark upon a nationwide campaign to educate citizens of the power of
jury nullification, so that we will not be liable for attempting to influence a
person who has already been selected to the jury pool. No where else in the world is the jury more
popular. It is high time that a
"Never doubt that a small
group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the
only thing that ever has."
This election year
voters want change. Both candidates agree. Change is the way. Change is good. It is certainly a low bar. The grant programs of the current
administration are impenetrable, to any but the most diseased forms of
biological research. Liberals promise to
revitalize the rejections of the grant administration we stopped receiving
after 9-11. We must demand our
individual rights be respected and protected before the administration and committees
of a constitutional government, rather than involuntarily subjected to
geographical representation without a care to the dangers of persecution, domestic
spying, animal laboratory research, foreclosure, malicious prosecutions and
identity theft.
The bar is
low. Neither candidate has purchased
rights to the tenth draft of the Constitution of Hospitals & Asylums Non
Governmental Economics (CHANGE). Without evidence of intent to respect and
protect the law I am uncertain of their commitment to alms when they promise
the
ORDER!!!
1. Do you ratify
the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court of 19 December 2003 and/or
four Optional Protocols to extend the defense of human rights treaty committees
to individual
a. Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of 4 February 2003;
b. Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of all Discrimination against Women of 22 December 2000;
c. Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil
an Political Rights of 23 March 1976 relating to the Human Rights
Committee;
d. Second Optional
Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights aiming at
the abolition of the death penalty of 15 December 1989;
2. Do you ratify three ILO Conventions in exchange for a reduction in
the corporate tax rate, reported to be the second highest in the world?
a. Holidays with Pay Convention
(Convention 132)
Revised 1970;
b. Workers with Family
Responsibilities (Convention
156) of 1981;
c. Maternity Protection (Convention
183) of 2000.
3. Do you make
the following amendments to liberate foreign policy from xenophobia?
a. Amend Title
22 US Code, Foreign Relations and Intercourse (a-FRaI-d), to just Foreign Relations (FR-ee);
b. Divide the USAID Bureau for
c. Amend the name of the Court of International Trade (CoITUS) to
i. Chapter
11 of Title 28 on the Judiciary on the Organization of the Court of
International Trade (CoIT) to
ii. reference to the CoIT in 28USCI(11)§251(a&b), §252, §253(a), §254, §255(a), §257, and §258(a)(1) to CC;
iii. Chapter 55 on Court Officers of CoIT in §871 and §872 to CC;
iv. Chapter 95 on the Jurisdiction and Venue of the COIT in §1581(a-j), §1582, §1583, §1584, and §1585 to CC;
v. Chapter 169 on CoIT Procedure in §2631(a-j), §2632(a-d), §2633(a-c), §2634, §2635(a-d), §2636(a-i), §2637(a-d), §2638, §2639(a&c), §2640(a,b,c&e), §2641(a&b), §2642, §2643(a-d), §2644, §2645(a-c), and §2646 to CC;
vi. Any other reference to CoIT that might be discovered at a later date, such as 18USCV(601)§6001(4) to CC.
ORDER!!!
Jurists are directed to vote – Yes
or No - on these issues and/or sub-issues themselves, and send the results and
any reservations to the author and Presidential candidates, for a debate to
enlist a Congressional supermajority to override any prior reservations of a
Head of State, on these human rights issues of merit to the
Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Citizens Commission on Human
Rights (CCHR), et al, plaintiffs v.
US Presidential Candidates Barack Obama
and John McCain whose foreign policies fail Asia and the Near East (ANE), US
Congress in defense of Title 22 Foreign Relations and Intercourse (a-FRaI-d) and the Court of International Trade (CoITUS), defendants HA-28-7-08
When it comes to the horrors of
war the
CHAPTER
2 Attorney General Ethics (AGE)
To amend Chapter 2 Soldier’s
and Airmen’s Home §41-70,
educate the jury to nullify unjust law with a not guilty verdict and pass a Justice
of the Peace Amendment to the US Constitution. Fifth draft. As the number of prisoners exceeds 2.2
million and we struggle to keep the international trade deficit less than $800
billion, it is a time to rededicate us to the ideals that inspired our
founders. As a judicial philosophy Title
24 adheres to the term “Justice of the Peace” that could be realized with name
changes in two Courts - Probate Court and the International Court of Justice. The Court of International Trade of the
United States (COITUS) also needs to change their name to US Customs Court (CC)
and Title 22 Foreign Relations and Intercourse (a-FRaI-d)
to just FR-ee.
Federal judges need to be limited with five-year term limits, with a
two-term limit to the Supreme Court. Our
primary goal is to cut the
Send comments, jury decisions and stories to Tony J. Sanders at title24uscode@aol.com