Hospitals & Asylums
Delinquency Notice HA-3-11-05
Dear Bureau of Economic Analysis:
GDPNIWD@bea.gov, PINIWD@bea.gov ,
CPNIWD@bea.gov,
FANIWD@bea.gov,
internationalaccounts@bea.gov
http://www.bea.doc.gov/bea/dn/home/gdp.htm
The reason that I am writing is
that the US GDP estimates in excess of $11 Trillion seem to be a vicious lie
that distorts market analysis and leads to corruption, treason and debt in
the economic sector such as exhibited in the recent Justice, Commerce and
Science Bill and the housing of state debt collection services with the
Attorney General rather than State Treasurer where such functions would be rational.
The crux of the dilemma is
that the US GDP seems to be falsely inflated with corporate and industrial costs.
These statistics are however brought
into global competition where the GDP is used to reflect the national
total of per capita income. If the
The real GDP, as
used internationally, can be derived by multiplying the Census
Bureau's estimate of per capita income of $21,500 by the national
population of 294 million coming to a grand total of $6.4 trillion. This
would bring the USA at the lower end of European nations who are much more
developed, upholding of equal and human rights and generally more civilized
than our nation has become over the past two and half decades, after our short
period of growth in the peace after Vietnam, without removing the USA from its
status as a first world nation.
$6.4 trillion is much more
believable GDP than $11.1 trillion. US citizens are not
wealthier than Europeans as a rule. We have more falsely imprisoned
people and wars and therefore lies than ever
before. We are in desperate need of the truth before our nation falls
completely out of the first world, while the politicians pretend to be the
wealthiest nation in the world, a claim that rightfully belongs to China,
where the per capita is only $5,500. The fundamental lie, or at least
that which we are concerned about in this letter, resides in the false accounting
of the GDP.
It is not wrong to account for the
GDP in a peculiarly national manner. What is wrong is to call this pound
a kilogram and flaunt the inflated figure internationally, in the CIA World
Fact Book and Human Development Report etc.
I am hoping that BEA can reconcile
the
I would be honored to hear your
preliminary arguments and wish you the very best in publicizing the truth
without losing track of the larger economy. I had initially hoped to hear
from you within the month of October.
This letter extends the request for a response to November. I hope to hear from you by email.
Thank you very much,
Anthony J. Sanders
Hospitals & Asylums
www.title24uscode.org/$6.4TrillionUSGDP.htm