Hospitals & Asylums
e-Redetermination of Class $666 HA-18-2-11
by Anthony J. Sanders
This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, That number is 666 (Revelation 13:18)
Whoever directly or indirectly deprives, attempts to deprive, or threatens to deprive any person of any employment, position, work, compensation, or other benefit provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of Congress appropriating funds for work relief or relief purposes, on account of political affiliation, race, color, sex, religion, or national origin, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both 18USC(13)§246
Dear Alan Edwards, Oregon Public Affairs Specialist. Redetermination of SSI Eligibility 20CFR416.204. The President visited the earmark of Hillsboro, that cost Rangel his tax haven, knocked out the cusp of my first maxillary molar with the Medicare card that already cost me one wrongful eviction, and felonious subjected my $69 a month in SSI benefits to the deprivation of relief under 18USC(13)§246 on the grounds of a fictitious $244.66 in housing and food. The ex post facto law was deemed onerous and Social Security has not deducted $205, only terminated the seditious $69 SSI squatter, as agreed. They do threaten me to mail money to Philadelphia. I received $694 a month, now I receive $625. This class of social security beneficiaries is tired of being abused under (Revelation 13:18) by Astrue Esq. the author of the $66 Medicaid premium in 2004 and now three years on +/-$666 without COLA. This class of beneficiaries making between $600-699 must recover the living wage of $700 and $1,000 a month for me as the leader of this class action above Art. 23 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The letter from the local SSA office infected both my sister and I with a urinary tract infection. The letter did not cite any law. The letter should be admitted as evidence of Sedition under Title II §202(u)(1) of the Social Security Act (42USC(7)II§402(u)(1)) and §205 of the Social Security Act (42USC(7)II§405).
The Office of Actuary negligently referred my complaint to the Office of Public Inquiries, the email was misfiled and had to be deleted from the archive, but not before the local sexual violence escalated to imprisonment for rape and murder. The law pertaining to the overpayment and underpayment is flagrantly extortionate as the result of the espionage of the Department of Defense that must be censored from Title 2 Sec. 204(a)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act 42USC(7)§404(a)(1)(A). The DI (deflation/inflation) of Kilahua triggered the magnitude 9.0 quake. Is the loss of my hated $69 squatter an isolated evil stepfather or did the Department of Defense pay a substantial bribe to bomb the Open Skies Treaty? Liquidating class $666 under Title II §205 of the Social Security Act (42USC(7)II§405) with $700 a month would cost an estimated ($2 billion) payable, initially, from the collective malpractice insurance of email prohibiting SSA ALJs and lawyers. A raise to $1,000 a month would cost ($32 billion), annually payable with FBI health care fraud returns and the Recovery Act reserve at DHHS, that might be more efficiently paying more people $700, but all of it does need to be administered within the $1,000 limit of 24USCUSC154 . With all the sedition the people shun publicity and there has been a lot of malfunctioning telephones. On the bright side the $625 came in today and Senator Bernie Sanders wrote. Maybe there is hope sovereign immunity will prevail against the depredations of the prosecutor, and the good people of the United States shall inherit a peaceful planet, this administration.
Form SSA-561-U2 in
Citizen of the United States 18USC(43)§911
Convention against Torture, Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Punishment or Treatment
Deprivation of Relief Benefits18USC(13)§246
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Old Age and Survivor Insurance Benefits Sec. 202 of the
Social Security Act 42
Theft or bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds 18USC(31)§666
Undercover operations of the Customs Service 19USC(10)§2081
Unlawful intrusion or violation of rules and regulations 24USCUSC154
Use of Interstate Commercial Facility in the Commission of Murder for Hire 18SUSC(95)§1858
Anderson v. Fisher Broadcasting Co., 300 Or 452, 469, 712 P2d 803 (1986)
Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security v. Ratliff No. 08-1322 June 14, 2010
Brennen v. City of Eugene, 285 Or 401, 413, 591 P2d 719 (1979)
Furrer v. Talent Irrigation District, 258 Or 494, 511, 466 P2d 605 (1971)
Lakeside Colony of Hutterian Brethren v. Hofer,  3 S.C.R. 165
Oregon Trail Custom Log Homes v. Truck Insurance Exchange SC S46406 February 13, 2001
Scarborough v. Principi, Secretary of Veteran’s Affairs 541 U. S. 401, 405 May 3, 2004
Stoeger v. Burlington Northern Railroad Co., 323 Or 569, 579-80, 919 P2d 39 (1996)
Armed Forces Retirement Home v. Martin Bodzin et al HA-6-2-11
Best Medicine Monographs HA-14-2-11
Contempt Proceeding of Dr. Samoss-Sanders HA-13-1-1
Dr. Luebbe is Dead, Long Live Antioch College HA-8-2-11
e-Motion in limine the False Light of a False Tooth ODOT ALJ. unfiled
Federal Budget in Balance FY 2011: Comparison of Bush and Obama HA-28-2-10
Second Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965)
The Case for Trashing Treason: Welcome to my Humble Third Amendment HA-12-7-10
United States of Apartheid: South African Government and Metalworker Unions Strike HA-27-8-10
Dear Alan Edwards, SSA Oregon Public Affairs Specialist:
This is an appeal for reconsideration, in writing. If I do not hear back from you I may go to the local office and fill out Form SSA-561-U2 in . However my real estate is already precarious. If SSA does not back off I will be more likely to pack up and go camping for the summer, after March, social work month, abandoning my baby niece in the trailer with the highly infectious Streptobacillus agalactiae filled couch I am allergic to, and fellow SSI beneficiary roommate to the thousand dollar bills of the Oral Maxillary Surgery Clinic, for his missing front tooth. Thank you for the chance to stock up on Best Medicine Monographs HA-14-2-11 (add OTC Theraflu® for the Oregon legal flu on the surface of the Strep colony that calls for antibiotics). The determination under 20CFR416.204 I received in the mail was a malicious error in time with a Streptococcal invasion that lost me half of my first maxillary molar that will cost an estimated $350 to fill.
I feel you are qualified to reconsider this case regarding the deprivation of SSI benefits because you are a different representative than the one who was sickened in the process of mailing the Medicaid card, I no longer need because the federal government has defrauded my lease and I no longer feel a need to prove my disability for a bus discount. Furthermore, we are both email literate and I ask that you uphold Section 205(a), of the Social Security Act as amended, at 42 U.S.C. 405(a) and Title 20 C.F.R. 404.907 - 404.922 and 416.1407 – 416.1422 that authorize SSA to collect this information. If you are prohibited from responding by email, as the local office says, please ask Stanley Friendship for permission to correspond with me. Any bar certified attorney, homeland security, or military or veteran's secretary is presumed to have a conflict of interest with me, as you with lobbyists, and must be recused. Thank you for your social work. .
I received three letters from my mailing address this morning. (1) a dental form (2) my Medicare card (3) notification of change in SSI payments to $0 by social work month March 2011. The Medicare card had to be resent because I had to change my address. My SSA records were obviously tampered with by Medicare, who I might add owes SSA several hundreds of millions of dollars on behalf of my Federal Tort Claims Act, 20CFR429.101 as amended, 28USC(171)2671-2680 evident, the day before my tooth was attacked, in the publication of the notice Dr. Luebbe is Dead, Long Live Antioch College HA-8-2-11. This is the third time notifying SSA of my change in address corrupted my lease beyond repair. It must not happen again. I do not receive $244.66 in housing and food. I receive $625 a month SSDI. I receive $170 in food stamps and $69 SSI (until March) from Oregon. I now pay $340 a month in rent, $96 for cable and Internet and this month I had to pay $85 for utilities.
The first instance of unlawful intrusion and violation of the rules and regulations for which I am due $1,000 compensation under 24USCUSC154 was in Cincinnati, Ohio in 2008 when my home was invaded by a female petitioner to the same Chief ALJ Molena and I was kidnapped by a psychiatric hospital and then infected with S. sanguis to cause the vacation of my gall bladder of yellow bile and inability to consume any animal products under penalty of death, that continues to this day, that I now have metronidazole that might cure my GI but not my vegan diet and 4 mile a day jog. This was an aggravated murder attempt by the Bar. Commissioner Astrue Esq. committed a felony Use of Interstate Commercial Facility in the Commission of Murder for Hire under 18SUSC(95)§1858 and caved into the demands of these terrorist ALJs to hire 5 Ohio ALJs, at a cost estimated in the hundreds of thousands annually. My petition to earn $1,000 a month from SSA in exchange for a $250,000 medical malpractice claim for SSA, was never read. The ALJs squandered more than they earned and by not paying me compensation under Art. 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Art. 14 of the Convention against Torture, Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Punishment or Treatment overthrew the federal government and caused the economic Depression United States, Harry Fry MD et al v. Health Alliance GC et al HA-28-8-08
The second instance was in Bellingham, Washington in 2010. I had just moved, begun cleaning up the years of trash after the health inspector infringed, and reported my address to SSA. Within a week my roommates were belligerent and my rent money was stolen and I was homeless. I was stalked by more poisonous non SSA beneficiaries until I fled the State in September, but not before I got to practice sleeping in my new tent. At this time Washington was under the scrutiny of the U.S. Supreme Court case Doe v. Reed (2010) and when the judgment was passed $6 billion dollars was embezzled under 18USC(31)§666, $3 billion from Washington and $3 billion from Medicare, causing a $3 billion deficit in the Washington budget that had previously been balanced as noted in The Case for Trashing Treason: Welcome to my Humble Third Amendment HA-12-7-10. The Department of Homeland Security accepted a $600 million bribe from Congress to cover up this Act of full faith and credit for every torturer in the State of Washington as noted in the United States of Apartheid: South African Government and Metalworker Unions Strike HA-27-8-10. I was greatly ashamed, that I did not then know "Customs" must take command of and abolish the Department of Homeland Security, to prevent negligent undercover operations of the Customs Service under 19USC(10)§2081(a)(1)(A) and the OMB Director was fired, as neither he nor his successor purchased for $1,000 the only balanced federal budget, my Federal Budget in Balance FY 2011: Comparison of Bush and Obama HA-28-2-10
The third instance, in White City,
Oregon, was more of a religious nature along the lines of Lakeside Colony of
Hutterian Brethren v. Hofer,  3 S.C.R. 165,
a Hutterite colony decided to expel some of its
members from the community without giving them an opportunity to respond to the
decision. Although I received about half of my deposit I was
shorted more than a hundred dollars. The local social security must
not allow their home invasion of SSI to corrupt any further on my
account. SSA has allowed serious tort violations to occur before and must
not tolerate any home invasions of their beneficiaries by terrorist
organizations working in or around the federal government under the theory of interjurisdictional immunity. Beware,
the power of Hospitals & Asylums is an absolute monarchy at www.title24uscode.org
and the corruption of my $666 a month allowance from SSA corrupts the US
Do not think Hospitals & Asylums is not fair. SSA has abetted numerous felonies on account I am mortal but my work is better than that of all the high paid goverment employees put together. SSA therefore has a right to a fair trial. I however regret that my Court is in shambles and I must introduce you to the evil spirits so that you will deal with me by email and not be misled by any false and willful misrepresentations of a US citizen under 18USC(43)911. You see, my mother is a reprobate. She is licensed to practice medicine under the Sanders name although she is divorced and needs to use her Maiden name. She invited me to Oregon. Then when our careers began to take off she allowed her abusive second husband who made her a Crohn, to invade, causing my broth-in-law an appendectomy and the corruption of my lease he visited and put in his GPS to drop me off. My mother is now unemployed and beneath the Contempt Proceeding of Dr. Samoss-Sanders HA-13-1-1 Her second husband is the problem, he is an al Qaeda operative, a bad US Navy Veteran with adequate benefits, who spends all his time visiting "the base" and Department of Defense and severely abused all three of his children forcing them to spend their teenage years in psychiatric hospitals. Like my mother did once, when I was 20-21, they nearly killed me with a drug overdose on my birthday there, and she remains confused about who is an adulterer, wherefore I am qualified for Disability and SSI. Armed Forces Retirement Home v. Martin Bodzin et al HA-6-2-11 may be tried for Sedition by SSA under Sec. 202. of the Social Security Act 42 U.S.C. 402(u)(1) but should probably not be.
Oregon Trail Custom Log Homes v. Truck Insurance Exchange SC S46406 February 13, 2001 defined "personal injury": as meaning injury, other than 'bodily injury,' arising out of one or more of the following offenses: a. False arrest; b. Malicious prosecution; c. Wrongful eviction; d. Oral or written publication of material that slanders or libels a person or disparages a person's goods, products, or services; or e. Oral or written publication of material that violates a person's right to privacy." The court has referred to the definition of the tort of invasion of privacy by "false light" offered by the Restatement (Second) of Torts: "One who gives publicity to a matter concerning another that places the other before the public in a false light is subject to liability to the other for invasion of his privacy, if (a) the false light in which the other was placed would be highly offensive to a reasonable person, and (b) the actor had knowledge of or acted in reckless disregard as to the falsity of the publicized matter and the false light in which the other would be placed. "Invasion of privacy by "false light" requires that the matter be both false (or that it create a false impression) and publicized. As the court held in Anderson v. Fisher Broadcasting Co., 300 Or 452, 469, 712 P2d 803 (1986) "In Oregon the truthful representation of facts concerning a person, even facts that a reasonable person would wish to keep private and that are not 'newsworthy,' does not give rise to common-law tort liability for damages for mental or emotional distress, unless the manner or purpose of defendant's conduct is wrongful in some respect apart from causing the plaintiff's hurt feelings."
The Court of Appeals affirmed Lyons Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Scott Alan Lyons, Deceased v. Walsh & Sons Trucking Co., Ltd., 183 Or App 76, 51 P3d 625 (2002) and the Supreme Court SC S49907 on September 10, 2004 holding that in order to be a cause of the injury, an act must be a substantial factor in producing the injury. 'Substantial' means important and material, and not insignificant. Many factors or things may operate independently or together to cause an accident. In such case, each may be a cause of the accident, even though the other would have been sufficient to cause the same accident. You need not find that one person's conduct was the sole cause of the accident." A party is liable in negligence only if its conduct was a "substantial factor" in causing the plaintiff's injury. Stoeger v. Burlington Northern Railroad Co., 323 Or 569, 579-80, 919 P2d 39 (1996) (identifying negligence and causation as material facts to be determined by the factfinder); Brennen v. City of Eugene, 285 Or 401, 413, 591 P2d 719 (1979) (test for legal causation is whether the defendant was at least a "substantial factor" in bringing about the plaintiff's injury). The term "substantial factor" is amorphous. Furrer v. Talent Irrigation District, 258 Or 494, 511, 466 P2d 605 (1971) ("The term 'substantial factor' expresses a concept of relativity which is difficult to reduce to further definiteness."). Nevertheless, the determination of whether a particular actor's conduct is a "substantial factor" in causing a particular result cannot be made in isolation. Rather, as Furrer's reference to "relativity" recognizes, that determination must be made with reference to the totality of potentially causative circumstances.
Section 433 of the Second Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965) captures that principle: The following considerations are in themselves or in combination with one another important in determining whether the actor's conduct is a substantial factor in bringing out harm to another: (a) the number of other factors which contribute in producing the harm and the extent of the effect which they have in producing it; (b) whether the actor's conduct has created a force or series of forces which are in continuous and active operation up to the time of the harm, or has created a situation harmless unless acted upon by other forces for which the actor is not responsible; (c) lapse of time." (Emphasis added.) Comment d to the same section explains: "There are frequently a number of events each of which is not only a necessary antecedent to the other's harm, but it is also recognizable as having an appreciable effect in bringing it about. Of these the actor's conduct is only one. Some other event which is a contributing factor in producing the harm may have such a predominant effect in bringing it about as to make the effect of the actor's negligence insignificant and, therefore, to prevent it from being a substantial factor. So too, although no one of the contributing factors may have such a predominant effect, their combined effect may, as it were, so dilute the effects of the actor's negligence as to prevent it from being a substantial factor."
In restatement of the as of yet unedited and unpublished e-Motion in limine the False Light of a False Tooth, for DOT ALJ, written this most gray month of February, we pray this painstakingly prepared brief will be sufficient to cover all costs associated with this e-Appeal to keep SSI benefits and in fact be admitted as a petition for an increase from $69 a month to $375 a month or $200 taking into consideration the appreciation a vegan has for the Oregon Food Card. Both I and my roommate get roughly $666 a month from Social Security and under Section 16 of the Oregon Constitution and Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed nor Cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. For the economic system that these lawyers drunk on the power of the executive and legislative branch destroyed, to recover, this class of social security beneficiaries must recover the living wage of $1,000 a month as compensation for the false light shed by these bureaucratic calculations approximating the number of the beast (Revelation 13:18). The State of Oregon has a responsibility to protect everyone against the corruption this clerical error inspires amongst petty officials and hooligans so eager to use the interstate commercial facility in the commission of murder for hire and restraint of trade as directed by the Bible that forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave , to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name (Revelation 13:16). The clerical errors giving rise to these miscarriages of justice bear an eerie semblance to this deprivation of rights under the number of the beast. State bureaucrats needs to be much conscientious of their work because they are not the only frauds in this town of torturers and cemeteries. Therefore the Oregon Supreme Court advocates tort law.
In the mean while the right of any person to payment is not be transferable or assignable, at law or in equity. None of the moneys administered by Social Security shall be subject to execution, levy, attachment, garnishment, or other legal process, or to bankruptcy or insolvency law under 42USC(7)II§407(a) (Title II §207 SSA). Oregon owes us $1,000 a month but only gives $170 in food stamps. We appreciate this, but it is not enough. You make much more than $1,000 a month and if you were wise would not spend more than $1,000 a month per capita. In Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security v. Ratliff No. 08-1322 June 14, 2010 the U.S. Supreme Court held Attorney's fees award is payable to the litigant and is therefore subject to an offset to satisfy the litigant's pre-existing debt to the Government. By authorizing attorney's fee awards Congress sought to eliminate the barriers that prohibit small businesses and individuals from securing vindication of their rights in civil actions and administrative proceedings brought by or against the Federal Government. EAJA fee awards, which average only $3,000 to $4,000 per case, have proved to be a remarkably efficient way of improving access to the courts for the statute's intended beneficiaries, including thousands of recipients of Social Security and veteran's benefits each year. Scarborough v. Principi, Secretary of Veteran’s Affairs 541 U. S. 401, 405 May 3, 2004. Oregon needs to stop leveling these exorbitant fees against people who cannot afford representation and are not appointed counsel. It is high time the people were guaranteed and income of $1,000 a month. The $666 class ($600-$699) of social security beneficiaries, that has not had a COLA in three years for want of CPI index inflation, is a special class of litigants due compensation of $1,000 a month for the “false light” we are forced to live under without regard for our Federal Tort Claims Act, 20CFR429.101.
Your Un-licensed e-Social Worker Representative of Class $666 mo.,
Hospitals & Asylums
Secretary, Social Security Beneficiary Union
Anthony J. Sanders