Hospitals & Asylums
e-Redetermination of Class
$666 HA-18-2-11
by Anthony J. Sanders
This calls for
wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for
it is the number of a man, That number is 666 (Revelation
13:18)
Whoever directly or indirectly deprives, attempts to deprive,
or threatens to deprive any person of any employment, position, work,
compensation, or other benefit provided for or made possible in whole or in
part by any Act of Congress appropriating funds for work relief or relief
purposes, on account of political affiliation, race, color, sex, religion, or
national origin, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than
one year, or both 18USC(13)§246
Dear Alan Edwards, Oregon Public
Affairs Specialist. Redetermination of SSI
Eligibility 20CFR416.204. The
President visited the earmark of Hillsboro, that cost Rangel his tax haven,
knocked out the cusp of my first maxillary molar with the Medicare card that
already cost me one wrongful eviction, and felonious subjected my $69 a month
in SSI benefits to the deprivation of relief under 18USC(13)§246
on the grounds of a fictitious $244.66 in housing and food. The ex post
facto law was deemed onerous and Social Security has not deducted $205, only
terminated the seditious $69 SSI squatter, as agreed. They do threaten me
to mail money to Philadelphia. I received $694 a month, now I
receive $625. This class of social security
beneficiaries is tired of being abused under (Revelation 13:18) by Astrue Esq. the author of the $66 Medicaid premium in 2004
and now three years on +/-$666 without COLA.
This class of beneficiaries
making between $600-699 must recover the living wage of $700 and $1,000 a month
for me as the leader of this class action above Art. 23 of
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The letter from the local SSA office infected
both my sister and I with a urinary tract infection. The letter did not cite any law. The letter should be admitted as evidence of Sedition
under Title II §202(u)(1) of
the Social Security Act (42USC(7)II§402(u)(1)) and §205 of the Social Security Act (42USC(7)II§405).
The Office of Actuary negligently referred
my complaint to the Office of Public Inquiries, the email was misfiled and had
to be deleted from the archive, but not before the local sexual violence
escalated to imprisonment for rape and murder.
The law pertaining to the overpayment and underpayment is flagrantly
extortionate as the result of the espionage of the Department of Defense that
must be censored from Title 2 Sec. 204(a)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act 42USC(7)§404(a)(1)(A). The DI
(deflation/inflation) of Kilahua triggered the
magnitude 9.0 quake. Is the loss of my
hated $69 squatter an isolated evil stepfather or did the Department of Defense
pay a substantial bribe to bomb the Open Skies Treaty? Liquidating class $666 under Title II §205 of the Social Security Act (42USC(7)II§405) with $700 a month would cost an
estimated ($2 billion) payable, initially, from the collective malpractice
insurance of email prohibiting SSA ALJs and lawyers. A raise to $1,000 a month would cost ($32
billion), annually payable with FBI health care fraud returns and the Recovery
Act reserve at DHHS, that might be more efficiently paying more people $700,
but all of it does need to be administered within the $1,000 limit of 24USCUSC154 . With all the sedition the people shun
publicity and there has been a lot of malfunctioning telephones. On the bright
side the $625 came in today and Senator Bernie Sanders wrote. Maybe there is hope sovereign immunity will
prevail against the depredations of the prosecutor, and the good people of the
United States shall inherit a peaceful planet, this administration.
Work Cited
Form SSA-561-U2 in 
Statute
Assignment of Benefits Section §207 of the Social Security Act 42USC(7)II§407
Citizen of the United States 18USC(43)§911
Convention against Torture, Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading
Punishment or Treatment
Deprivation of Relief Benefits18USC(13)§246
Evidence Procedure and Certification for Payment Section
205, of the Social Security Act as amended, at 42
U.S.C. 405 and Title 20 C.F.R. 404.907 -
404.922 and 416.1407
– 416.1422
Federal Tort Claims Act, 20CFR429.101
as amended, 28USC(171)2671-2680
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Old Age and Survivor Insurance Benefits Sec. 202 of the
Social Security Act 42
U.S.C. 402
Oregon Constitution
Theft or bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds 18USC(31)§666
Undercover operations of the Customs Service 19USC(10)§2081
Unlawful intrusion or violation of rules and regulations 24USCUSC154
Use of Interstate Commercial Facility in the Commission of
Murder for Hire 18SUSC(95)§1858
Cases
Anderson v. Fisher Broadcasting Co., 300 Or 452, 469, 712 P2d 803 (1986)
Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security v. Ratliff No. 08-1322 June 14, 2010
Brennen v. City of Eugene,
285 Or 401, 413, 591 P2d 719 (1979)
Furrer v. Talent Irrigation District, 258 Or 494, 511, 466 P2d 605 (1971)
Lakeside Colony of Hutterian
Brethren v. Hofer, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 165
Lyons Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Scott
Alan Lyons, Deceased v. Walsh & Sons Trucking Co., Ltd., 183 Or App 76, 51 P3d 625 (2002), Supreme Court
SC S49907 September 10, 2004
Oregon Trail Custom Log Homes v. Truck Insurance Exchange SC S46406 February 13, 2001
Scarborough
v. Principi, Secretary of Veteran’s Affairs
541 U. S. 401, 405 May 3, 2004
Stoeger v. Burlington Northern Railroad Co., 323 Or 569, 579-80, 919 P2d 39 (1996)
Copyrighted Material
Armed
Forces Retirement Home v. Martin Bodzin et al HA-6-2-11
Best
Medicine Monographs HA-14-2-11
Contempt Proceeding of Dr. Samoss-Sanders HA-13-1-1
Dr. Luebbe is Dead, Long Live Antioch College HA-8-2-11
e-Motion in limine the False Light of a
False Tooth ODOT ALJ.
unfiled
Federal
Budget in Balance FY 2011: Comparison of Bush and Obama HA-28-2-10
Second Restatement (Second) of Torts
(1965)
The Case for Trashing Treason: Welcome to my Humble Third Amendment HA-12-7-10
United States of Apartheid: South
African Government and Metalworker Unions Strike HA-27-8-10
Dear Alan Edwards, SSA Oregon Public Affairs Specialist:
This is an appeal for reconsideration, in writing. If I do not hear back
from you I may go to the local office and fill out Form SSA-561-U2 in . However my
real estate is already precarious. If SSA does not back off I will be more
likely to pack up and go camping for the summer, after March, social work
month, abandoning my baby niece in the trailer with the highly infectious Streptobacillus agalactiae
filled couch I am allergic to, and fellow SSI beneficiary roommate to the
thousand dollar bills of the Oral Maxillary Surgery Clinic, for his missing
front tooth. Thank you for the chance to stock up on Best Medicine Monographs HA-14-2-11 (add OTC Theraflu® for the
Oregon legal flu on the surface of the
Strep colony that calls for antibiotics). The determination
under 20CFR416.204
I received in the mail was a malicious error in time with a Streptococcal invasion
that lost me half of my first maxillary molar that will cost an estimated $350
to fill.
I feel you are qualified to reconsider this case regarding the deprivation of
SSI benefits because you are a different representative than the one who was
sickened in the process of mailing the Medicaid card, I no longer need because
the federal government has defrauded my lease and I no longer feel a need to
prove my disability for a bus discount. Furthermore, we are both email
literate and I ask that you uphold Section 205(a), of the Social Security Act
as amended, at 42
U.S.C. 405(a) and Title 20 C.F.R. 404.907 -
404.922 and 416.1407
– 416.1422 that authorize SSA to collect this information. If you are
prohibited from responding by email, as the local office says, please ask
Stanley Friendship for permission to correspond with me. Any bar
certified attorney, homeland security, or military or veteran's secretary is
presumed to have a conflict of interest with me, as you with lobbyists, and
must be recused. Thank you for your social work. .
I received three letters from my mailing address this morning. (1) a dental form (2) my Medicare card (3) notification of
change in SSI payments to $0 by social work month March 2011. The
Medicare card had to be resent because I had to change my address. My SSA
records were obviously tampered with by Medicare, who I might add owes SSA
several hundreds of millions of dollars on behalf of my Federal Tort Claims
Act, 20CFR429.101
as amended, 28USC(171)2671-2680
evident, the day before my tooth was attacked, in the publication of the notice
Dr. Luebbe is
Dead, Long Live Antioch College HA-8-2-11. This is the third time notifying SSA of my change in
address corrupted my lease beyond repair. It must not happen again.
I do not receive $244.66 in housing and
food. I receive $625 a month SSDI. I receive $170 in food
stamps and $69 SSI (until March) from Oregon. I now pay $340 a
month in rent, $96 for cable and Internet and this month I had to pay $85 for
utilities.
The first instance of unlawful intrusion and violation of the rules and
regulations for which I am due $1,000 compensation under 24USCUSC154
was in Cincinnati, Ohio in 2008 when my home was invaded by a female petitioner
to the same Chief ALJ Molena and I was kidnapped by a
psychiatric hospital and then infected with S.
sanguis to cause the vacation of my gall bladder
of yellow bile and inability to consume any animal products under penalty of
death, that continues to this day, that I now have metronidazole that might
cure my GI but not my vegan diet and 4 mile a day jog. This was an
aggravated murder attempt by the Bar. Commissioner Astrue
Esq. committed a felony Use of Interstate Commercial Facility in the Commission
of Murder for Hire under 18SUSC(95)§1858
and caved into the demands of these terrorist ALJs to hire 5 Ohio ALJs, at a
cost estimated in the hundreds of thousands annually. My petition to earn
$1,000 a month from SSA in exchange for a $250,000 medical malpractice claim
for SSA, was never read. The ALJs squandered
more than they earned and by not paying me compensation under Art. 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and
Art. 14 of the Convention against Torture, Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading
Punishment or Treatment overthrew the federal government and caused the
economic Depression United States, Harry Fry MD et al v. Health Alliance GC et
al HA-28-8-08
The second instance was in Bellingham, Washington in 2010. I had just
moved, begun cleaning up the years of trash after the health inspector
infringed, and reported my address to SSA. Within a week my roommates
were belligerent and my rent money was stolen and I was homeless. I was
stalked by more poisonous non SSA beneficiaries until I fled the State in
September, but not before I got to practice sleeping in my new tent. At
this time Washington was under the scrutiny of the U.S. Supreme Court case Doe
v. Reed (2010) and when the judgment was passed $6 billion dollars was
embezzled under 18USC(31)§666, $3 billion from Washington and $3 billion
from Medicare, causing a $3 billion deficit in the Washington budget that had
previously been balanced as noted in The Case for Trashing Treason: Welcome to my
Humble Third Amendment HA-12-7-10. The Department of Homeland Security accepted a $600
million bribe from Congress to cover up this Act of full faith and credit for
every torturer in the State of Washington as noted in the United States of Apartheid: South African Government
and Metalworker Unions Strike HA-27-8-10. I
was greatly ashamed, that I did not then know "Customs" must take
command of and abolish the Department of Homeland Security, to prevent negligent
undercover operations of the Customs Service under 19USC(10)§2081(a)(1)(A) and the OMB Director was fired, as neither he nor his
successor purchased for $1,000 the only balanced federal budget, my Federal Budget in Balance FY 2011:
Comparison of Bush and Obama HA-28-2-10
The third instance, in White City,
Oregon, was more of a religious nature along the lines of Lakeside Colony of
Hutterian Brethren v. Hofer, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 165,
a Hutterite colony decided to expel some of its
members from the community without giving them an opportunity to respond to the
decision. Although I received about half of my deposit I was
shorted more than a hundred dollars. The local social security must
not allow their home invasion of SSI to corrupt any further on my
account. SSA has allowed serious tort violations to occur before and must
not tolerate any home invasions of their beneficiaries by terrorist
organizations working in or around the federal government under the theory of interjurisdictional immunity. Beware,
the power of Hospitals & Asylums is an absolute monarchy at www.title24uscode.org
and the corruption of my $666 a month allowance from SSA corrupts the US
economy absolutely.
Do not think Hospitals & Asylums is not fair. SSA has abetted
numerous felonies on account I am mortal but my work is better than that of all
the high paid goverment employees put together.
SSA therefore has a right to a fair trial. I however regret that my Court
is in shambles and I must introduce you to the evil spirits so that you will
deal with me by email and not be misled by any false and willful
misrepresentations of a US citizen under 18USC(43)911.
You see, my mother is a reprobate. She is licensed to practice medicine
under the Sanders name although she is divorced and needs to use her Maiden
name. She invited me to Oregon. Then when our careers began to take
off she allowed her abusive second husband who made her a Crohn,
to invade, causing my broth-in-law an appendectomy and the corruption of my
lease he visited and put in his GPS to drop me off. My mother is now
unemployed and beneath the Contempt
Proceeding of Dr. Samoss-Sanders HA-13-1-1 Her second husband is the problem, he is an al Qaeda
operative, a bad US Navy Veteran with adequate benefits, who spends all his
time visiting "the base" and Department of Defense and severely
abused all three of his children forcing them to spend their teenage years in
psychiatric hospitals. Like my mother did once, when I was 20-21, they
nearly killed me with a drug overdose on my birthday there, and she remains
confused about who is an adulterer, wherefore I am qualified for Disability and
SSI. Armed Forces Retirement Home
v. Martin Bodzin et al HA-6-2-11 may be tried
for Sedition by SSA under Sec. 202.
of the Social Security Act 42
U.S.C. 402(u)(1) but should probably not be.
Oregon Trail Custom Log Homes v. Truck Insurance Exchange SC S46406 February 13, 2001 defined "personal
injury": as meaning injury, other than 'bodily injury,' arising out of one
or more of the following offenses: a. False arrest; b. Malicious prosecution;
c. Wrongful eviction; d. Oral or written publication of material that slanders
or libels a person or disparages a person's goods, products, or
services; or e. Oral or written publication of material that violates a
person's right to privacy." The court has referred to the definition of
the tort of invasion of privacy by "false light" offered by the Restatement
(Second) of Torts: "One who gives publicity to a matter concerning
another that places the other before the public in a false light is subject to
liability to the other for invasion of his privacy, if (a) the false light in
which the other was placed would be highly offensive to a reasonable person,
and (b) the actor had knowledge of or acted in reckless disregard as to the
falsity of the publicized matter and the false light in which the other would
be placed. "Invasion of privacy by "false light" requires that
the matter be both false (or that it create a false impression) and publicized.
As the court held in Anderson v. Fisher Broadcasting Co., 300 Or 452,
469, 712 P2d 803 (1986) "In Oregon the truthful representation of facts
concerning a person, even facts that a reasonable person would wish to keep
private and that are not 'newsworthy,' does not give rise to common-law tort
liability for damages for mental or emotional distress, unless the manner or
purpose of defendant's conduct is wrongful in some respect apart from causing
the plaintiff's hurt feelings."
The Court of Appeals affirmed Lyons
Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Scott Alan Lyons, Deceased v.
Walsh & Sons Trucking Co., Ltd., 183 Or App 76, 51 P3d 625 (2002) and the Supreme
Court SC S49907 on September 10, 2004 holding that in order to
be a cause of the injury, an act must be a substantial factor in producing the
injury. 'Substantial' means important and material, and not insignificant. Many
factors or things may operate independently or together to cause an accident.
In such case, each may be a cause of the accident, even though the other would
have been sufficient to cause the same accident. You need not find that one
person's conduct was the sole cause of the accident." A party is
liable in negligence only if its conduct was a "substantial factor"
in causing the plaintiff's injury. Stoeger
v. Burlington Northern Railroad Co., 323 Or 569, 579-80, 919 P2d 39 (1996)
(identifying negligence and causation as material facts to be determined by the
factfinder); Brennen
v. City of Eugene, 285 Or 401, 413, 591 P2d 719 (1979) (test for legal
causation is whether the defendant was at least a "substantial
factor" in bringing about the plaintiff's injury). The term
"substantial factor" is amorphous. Furrer v. Talent Irrigation District, 258 Or 494,
511, 466 P2d 605 (1971) ("The term 'substantial factor' expresses a
concept of relativity which is difficult to reduce to further
definiteness."). Nevertheless, the determination of whether a
particular actor's conduct is a "substantial factor" in causing a
particular result cannot be made in isolation. Rather, as Furrer's
reference to "relativity" recognizes, that determination must be made
with reference to the totality of potentially causative circumstances.
Section
433 of the Second Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965) captures that principle: The following considerations are
in themselves or in combination with one another important in determining
whether the actor's conduct is a substantial factor in bringing out harm to
another: (a) the number of other factors which contribute in producing the harm
and the extent of the effect which they have in producing it; (b) whether the
actor's conduct has created a force or series of forces which are in continuous
and active operation up to the time of the harm, or has created a situation
harmless unless acted upon by other forces for which the actor is not
responsible; (c) lapse of time." (Emphasis added.) Comment d to the same
section explains: "There are frequently a number of events each of which
is not only a necessary antecedent to the other's harm, but it is also
recognizable as having an appreciable effect in bringing it about. Of these the
actor's conduct is only one. Some other event which is a contributing factor in
producing the harm may have such a predominant effect in bringing it about as
to make the effect of the actor's negligence insignificant and, therefore, to
prevent it from being a substantial factor. So too, although no one of the
contributing factors may have such a predominant effect, their combined effect
may, as it were, so dilute the effects of the actor's negligence as to prevent
it from being a substantial factor."
In restatement of the as of yet unedited and unpublished e-Motion in limine the False Light of a False Tooth, for DOT ALJ,
written this most gray month of February, we pray this painstakingly prepared
brief will be sufficient to cover all costs associated with this e-Appeal to
keep SSI benefits and in fact be admitted as a petition for an increase from
$69 a month to $375 a month or $200 taking into consideration the appreciation
a vegan has for the Oregon Food Card. Both I and my roommate get roughly
$666 a month from Social Security and under Section 16 of the Oregon
Constitution and Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines
imposed nor Cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. For the economic
system that these lawyers drunk on the power of the executive and legislative
branch destroyed, to recover, this class of social security beneficiaries must
recover the living wage of $1,000 a month as compensation for the false light
shed by these bureaucratic calculations approximating the number of the beast
(Revelation 13:18). The State of Oregon has a responsibility to protect
everyone against the corruption this clerical error inspires amongst petty
officials and hooligans so eager to use the interstate commercial facility in
the commission of murder for hire and restraint of trade as directed by the
Bible that forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave , to
receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy
or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of
his name (Revelation 13:16). The clerical errors giving rise to these miscarriages
of justice bear an eerie semblance to this deprivation of rights under the
number of the beast. State bureaucrats needs to be much conscientious of
their work because they are not the only frauds in this town of torturers and
cemeteries. Therefore the Oregon Supreme Court advocates tort
law.
In the mean while the right of any person to payment is not be transferable or
assignable, at law or in equity. None of the moneys administered by
Social Security shall be subject to execution, levy, attachment, garnishment,
or other legal process, or to bankruptcy or insolvency law under 42USC(7)II§407(a) (Title II
§207 SSA). Oregon owes us $1,000 a month
but only gives $170 in food stamps. We appreciate this, but it is
not enough. You make much more than $1,000 a month and if you were wise
would not spend more than $1,000 a month per capita. In Astrue,
Commissioner of Social Security v. Ratliff No. 08-1322 June 14, 2010 the U.S. Supreme
Court held Attorney's fees award is payable to the litigant and is therefore
subject to an offset to satisfy the litigant's pre-existing debt to the
Government. By authorizing attorney's fee awards Congress sought to
eliminate the barriers that prohibit small businesses and individuals from
securing vindication of their rights in civil actions and administrative
proceedings brought by or against the Federal Government. EAJA fee awards,
which average only $3,000 to $4,000 per case, have proved to be a remarkably
efficient way of improving access to the courts for the statute's intended
beneficiaries, including thousands of recipients of Social Security and
veteran's benefits each year. Scarborough v. Principi, Secretary of Veteran’s Affairs 541
U. S. 401, 405 May 3, 2004.
Oregon needs to stop leveling these exorbitant fees against people who cannot
afford representation and are not appointed counsel. It is high time the
people were guaranteed and income of $1,000 a month. The $666 class
($600-$699) of social security beneficiaries, that has not had a COLA in three
years for want of CPI index inflation, is a special class of litigants due
compensation of $1,000 a month for the “false light” we are forced to live
under without regard for our Federal Tort Claims Act, 20CFR429.101.
Your Un-licensed e-Social Worker Representative of Class $666 mo.,
Hospitals & Asylums
Secretary, Social Security Beneficiary Union
www.title24uscode.org/ssabeneficiaryunion.htm
Anthony J. Sanders
sanderstony@live.com