Hospitals & Asylums
November 2016
By Anthony J. Sanders
Social Security Amendments of January 1, 2016 HA-6-6-16
To make orphan a qualifying disability
for $777 mo. SSI or SSDI in 2017.
To legislate a 2.4% DI tax rate to pay
for a 6% COLA for calendar year 2017 and 2.2% DI tax rate and 3% COLA every
year thereafter.
To amend
the DI tax rate from 1.80% in 2015, to 2.37% in 2016, to 2.40% in 2017, to
2.20% in 2018 to when all the Baby Boomer shall have retired. To increase the
0.9% DI tax in 2015 to 1.2% DI tax for employees and employers in 2017 and 1.1%
in 2018 under Sec. 201(b)(1)(S) of the Social Security Act 42USC(7)II¤401.
To amend the OASI tax rate
from 10.60% in 2015, to 10.03% in 2016, to 10.00% in 2017 and 10.20% in 2018 and
thereafter to prevent the DI fund from being depleted and OASI Trust Fund from
premature deficit. To increase the 5.30% OASI tax in 2015 to 5.00% in 2017, to
5.10% in 2018, for employees and employers without increasing the overall 12.4%
OASDI under 26USC¤3101 and 26USC(C)(21)(A)¤3111 (as hacked in 2016) or 15.3%
OASDI and Hospital Insurance (HI) Federal Insurance Contribution Act tax-rate
under 26USC(A)(2)¤1401.
To pay a 6% Cost-of-living adjustment
(COLA) 2017 to compensate for the theft of the 2016 COLA and 3% COLA every year
thereafter to protect benefit determination from attrition by average estimated
inflation of 2.6% in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) under Sec. 215(i) of the Social Security Act 42USC¤415(i).
Be it enacted in the House
and Senate Assembled - ÔOrphan Act
of 2016Õ HA-15-9-16
2016 Annual Report to
the Board of Trustees of the Federal Old Age Survivor Disability Insurance
Trust Fund and Supplemental Security Income Program HA-6-6-16 as edited
Dear Mr.
President: This is the first Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the
Federal Old Age Survivor Disability Trust Funds and Supplemental Security
Income Program for summer solstice 2016 as amended for the fall equinox 2016.
The 2017 Summer Solstice Instructions shall summarize the OASDI and SSI
programs in one easy to understand table. This new edition supplements the
United States Code under 1USC¤202(c) and amends Annual Reports under Sec. 1161
of Title 11 of the Social Security Act 42USC(7)XI-B¤1320c-10
to change the deadline for the Annual Report of the Social Security and
Medicare Programs from April Fool's day to the Summer Solstice. The SSA and CMS
Actuaries published their 2016 reports with summary by the Treasury, one day
late on June 22, 2106. The Acting Commissioner has not submitted a 2016 annual
SSI report on the federally funded SSI program, SSI program growth rates were
reported in the 2015 report to be actually nearly zero, although written as 1% . Public Law
regarding Social Security since 1996 has been a crime. The Administration must
redress three years without COLA 2009-2011 at $674 mo. SSI with a 6% COLA in
2017 to make up for the COLA the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 drank and ensure
beneficiaries receive a 3% COLA every year thereafter. Medicare Part B Premium $104.90 in 2015,
$121.80 in 2016 (16.1% growth) and $149.00 in 2017 (22.3% growth) is
neoplastic, and the HHS budget and Health United States 2015 are unaccountably
high. SMI premium increases must again be held harmless under Sec. 1840 of the
Social Security Act 42USC¤1395s - $104.90 2015 rates through 2016 and until CMS
agrees to a 2.5% health annuity of $107.50 if the COLA is 3% or 5% $110.20 provided
there is a 6% COLA in 2017. In
2016 employee 26USC¤3101 and employer ¤3111 tax rates and deprivation of relief
benefits 18USC¤246 were hacked because the 2.37% DI tax rate is not legible on
paystubs. The IRS and SSA Commissioners must agree in writing to a legible tax
rate of 2.4% DI 10.0% OASI in 2017 and 2.2% DI 10.2% OASI in 2018 and
thereafter and ensure the public that Actuary has learned how to calculate the
OASDI tax rate right for once. The 2016 report was wrong regarding the precise
allocation of the revenues from the DI and OASI trust funds in 2016, although
he got the apportionment right for 2017 and thereafter, the 2.37% DI tax rate
is not right because it is illegible on pay-stubs and it would be irresponsible
to never make a withdrawal from the OASI Trust Fund without prematurely
depleting the DI trust fund, and must be made right immediately. Actuarial
propaganda about raising tax rates or reducing benefits must cease. The Actuary
must account for the fact that the tax on the rich will end poverty in the
United States by 2020. The United States is obligated to tax the rich under
26USC¤7201 to pay child SSI to 16-24 million poor children in 2017 under
18USC¤228(b). Passing the Social Security Amendments of January 1, 2016 in
September 2016 would have left the winner of the Presidential election an
estimated $20 billion federal budget surplus in FY 2017 but beginning January
1, 2017 is only capable of paying all 16-14 million poor children growing up in
the United States in 2017 and ending poverty by 2020 – The Harmless Deal.
Book
10 Armed Forces Retirement Home (AFRH)
To supplement the transfer of Chapter 1 Navy Hospitals,
Army and Navy Hospitals, and Hospital Relief for Seamen and Other ¤1-40 to
Chapter 10 Armed Forces Retirement Home ¤400-435. The Armed Forces Retirement Home (AFRH)
houses approximately 1,600 veterans at the U.S. SoldiersÕ and AirmenÕs Home (USSAH
in Washington D.C. and the U.S. Naval Home (USNH) in Gulfport,
Mississippi. At an average age of
76, the largest percentage of residents, 80% are WWII veterans, 30% in Korea
and 10% in Vietnam. The average
length of stay is 10.6 years. The Naval Home was established in the Naval Hospitals Act of Feb.
26, 1811 by Paul Hamilton of South Carolina, secretary of the Navy, under
President James Madison. The
charter was to provide a permanent asylum for old and disabled naval officers,
seamen and Marines. The Naval Home
was however not officially opened until 1834 after James Fillebrown,
Secretary of Commissioners of Navy Hospitals appealed his embezzlement
conviction to the Supreme Court in 1833, it was known as the Naval Asylum until
the name was changed to the Naval Home in 1880. The SoldierÕs Home was established in
1851, as an asylum for old and disabled veterans. It was at the SoldierÕs Home that
President Abraham Lincoln wrote the Emancipation Proclamation. The SoldiersÕ Home began admitting airmen
in 1917 and officially changed its name to SoldiersÕ and AirmenÕs Home in
1972. The Naval Home was initially
funded by contributions from the active force. This contribution was augmented
by all fines imposed upon persons of the Navy and was the principal source of
monies for the Naval Hospital Fund/Pension Fund. The Pension Fund also received
all money accruing from the sale of prizes of war. For nearly 100 years these
monies funded the Naval Home. In
1934, the Pension Fund was abolished by Congress and
the proceeds were deposited into the U.S. Treasury. From 1935 until 1991, the
Naval Home was funded by Navy appropriations. Today, it is funded by monthly
withholding from active duty troops, fines and forfeitures, interest off the
Trust Fund and resident fees, to reduce the deficit and debt by abolishing the
Other Defense – Civil Programs and Allowances rows from OMB Historical
Table 4.1 Outlays by Agency and equivalent amount of undistributed offsetting
receipts before 2009.
Perjury Per Curium HA-15-11-16
A class action for
dismissal in regards to at least three cases, involving five homeless people,
including myself, victimized by two cops in different cities, an officer and a
police chief, who perjure the witnesses and victims of their common crimes to
recklessly cause serious physical injury to another by means of a deadly or
dangerous weapon under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the
value of human life. The ticket was
issued the instant my brother-in-law legally shot and a killed his first
buck. The police chief got a bad
grade of farmland that requires a protractor to determine seems to be a serial
killer of 20 year olds. The officer has 20 new prohibitions about smoking, $435
fine for feeding the deer, etc. and some old ones about camping and sleeping
that must be nullified by the Court to cure his serial 4th degree
assaults before the tourists arrive next year. It is a fatal mistake to
prosecute innocent witnesses and victims of felonies committed by police
officers. It's all-right the cops are the only ones who do any writing in the
Circuit Court, the lawyers just have to be faster and more precise with their
per curium for perjury. If lawyers cannot instantly dismiss the case(s) with a
fashionable per curium personally identifying information injunction
decision(s) to prevent identity theft, because they know how to read perjury
and truly hear other people's grievances, like a professional or a family
member, in my opinion a lawyer of the Supreme Court must write a brief to
appear in a felony trial as an innocent and professional witness due fees. This
is my notice of appearance. The state attorney general must be charged with
cyber-stalking to do health justice. State attorney general employees are
usually restrained to defending state agencies in federal court. Per curium
decisions overruling police perjury are legally necessary to prevent
miscarriage of justice in these cases. I was on the cover of the local paper
washing my clothes three times in October, that city could have used their old
building to get federal funding for a homeless shelter. I am running for
Commissioner of Social Security because the trust funds can afford a 6%
cost-of-living adjustment in 2017 to make a 3% COLA law and tax the rich to end
poverty by 2020 and start paying all the poor children SSI in 2017 beginning
with orphans. The November election trials that killed Senator Alan Bates MD
and Avi
Feldman (age 20) might have been avoided if the police had not perjured to
summon my Court of innocent homeless witnesses and victims of police brutality
and state attorney general stalking to the compulsory process of the Circuit
Court of record under 24USC¤420(a)(1). The
female legal expert on marijuana age law whose date I spurned the moment Avi Feldman (age 20) was fatally stabbed lost her job
because it turns out a city inspector the week before discovered she was only
17 and that was her last day on the job, no compensation dispensed. UN Compensation
rates in the first instance 1. People forced to relocate as the result of
military action $2,500 -$4,000 for an individual and $5,000-$8,000 for a
family. 2. People who suffered serious bodily injury or families reporting a
death as the result of military action are entitled to between $2,500 and
$10,000. The
Court should be informed that the Social Security Act needs to be amended to
share back benefits with social worker and non-social worker representatives
under Sec. 206 of the Social Security Act 42USC¤406.
Signing Bonus HA-22-11-16
California is recommended
to reimburse $22 million that have already been taken from the rightful
beneficiaries of signing bonuses from the 2000s under 18USC¤246 and release
Sgt. Toni Jaffe immune under Sec. 204(c) of the Social Security Act
42USC¤404(c). 9,700 California Army
National Guard soldiers and veterans have been ordered to repay +/-$15,000 in
enlistment bonuses from the 2000s.
Sgt. Toni Jaffe pleaded guilty to filing false claims for handing out
more than $15 million in bonuses to ineligible soldiers and is serving a
30-month sentence. Eligibility was apparently limited to civil and intelligence
officers, probably due to the hacking of the original documents, that was
unlawfully retroactively interpreted to not cover grunts after 2010. To create the Naval Asylum promised in
the Naval Hospital Act of Feb. 26, 1811 veterans commissioned the jury that
initially tried US v. Thomas Fillebrown, Secretary of Commissioners of Navy Hospitals
32 US 28 7 Pet. 28 (1833) arrested, detained him, and tried him, in failing
health, all the way to the Supreme Court, as cited by Justice Story in Minis v. US 40 U.S. 423 (1841) after the
Retirement Home had been created in Washington DC, where Abraham Lincoln penned
the Emancipation Proclamation two decades later. Signing bonuses are a respected form of
hostile fire pay under 24USC¤412. The overpayment decision is unlawful under
the Sec. 204(a) of the Social Security Act 42USC¤404(a) because the
beneficiaries are faultless and the paymaster should be immune under Sec.
204(c) of the Social Security Act 42USC¤404(c). The Social Security
Administration is appalled. This message was transmitted to the Armed Forces
Retirement Home Trust fund under 24USC¤419. The State of California must recover
from an electoral meltdown that took many lives since the Democratic Primaries
and created many refugees. CaliforniaÕs $22 million is not immune under the XI
Amendment to civil rights remedies under 42USC¤2000d-7. Please restore ÒFirst Amendment Privacy
ProtectionÓ to Internet searches of 42USC¤2000aa.
SNAP virus HA-29-11-16
Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP) statute was amended in 2014 but a strange section
pertaining to publicly operated community health centers (from 1985?) needs to
be repealed at 7USC¤212a. The
October 7, 2016 SNAP budget analysis was restored to the Social Security
Matters blog that the USDA Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) cut Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) spending Halloween 2013. This is
deprivation relief benefits under 18USC¤246. Total
spending went down dramatically from a high of $76 billion in 2013, to $70
billion in 2014, and 8% decrease, and stayed at $70 billion in 2015 and then
went down to $56 billion in 2016 a -20% decrease. The number of participants
went down from 48 million in 2013, to 46 million in 2014 and 2015 and then to
44 million in 2016. Average benefits payments also went down from $133.07 in
2013, to $125.01 in 2014, to $126.83 in 2015 and $125.52 in 2016. Participants
times average benefits equals $76.6 billion in 2013 and $70 billion in 2014 and
15. $125.52 times 12 times 44.3 million beneficiaries equals $66.7 billion but
there is only $55.7 billion budgeted in 2016. Have they massively cut SNAP
benefits or made an accounting error to complicate VilsackÕs
second count of deprivation of relief benefits under 18USC246? I find that the
SNAP spending table of October 17, 2016 are in error.
No benefits should be cut as a result of this harmless accounting error. Because
of the intentional decline in average benefit and spending the second
conviction for deprivation of relief benefits stands under 18USC246. SNAP
average benefits and total spending must grow 3% annually and the voluntary
population should grow by 1% annually, 104% annual SNAP growth under Sec. 4 of
the Social Security Amendments of January 1, 2016.
The federal and USDA
budgets must not be impaired by these SNAP confessions of 2016. SNAP
seems to have fixed the mathematical errors of October 7, 2016 on November 10,
2016 but continues to be wrong in regards to how much money they save by
cutting benefits. FY2013 47.6 million received an average benefit of $1,596.84
for a total of $76 billion. Agreement Vilsack may
have stolen a Christmas bonus with Halloween cuts. FY 2014 46.6 million people
received $1,501.20 for a total of $70.0 billion. FY 2015 45.8 million people
received $1,521.96 for $69.7 billion. FY 2016 44.3 million people received
$1,505.4 for $61.1 billion but this calculates to $66.6 billion. As unpopular
as he may have become, Vilsack is not a thief of a
Christmas bonus for himself as it pertains to the Treasury this 2016 heÕs a
liar who is not immune for intentionally cutting average benefits of faultless
beneficiaries under Sec. 204(c) of the Social Security act 42USC404(c) and
18USC246. Thanks for contributing
665,000 pounds of food to the Food Bank SSA. Cutting SNAP benefits is not the
way to reduce federal agriculture spending. Cutting SNAP benefits is the way to
be a villain whose accounting, computer crime, and cowboy coffee is not
acceptable. The Agriculture Secretary must ensure 3% annual increase in
benefits, 1% population growth for a total of 104% growth, 2.5% growth for
other non-welfare USDA agency programs. SNAP seem to
have fixed the mathematical errors of October 7, 2016 on November 10, 2016 but
continues to be wrong. Due to the
infringement of the SNAP homepage on my and my siblings birthday I am inclined
to charge fees for having to restate the actual conviction of Agriculture
Secretary Vilsack for two counts deprivation of
relief benefits Halloween 2013 and 11:45 pm Thanksgiving 2016 norovirus cowboy coffee under 18USC246. Free range, free
Hammond, free Presidential proclamation against no camping signs in the western
national forest expansion, eminent domain for bike path to the lake and
mountain access trails as high and far as the No Candies Trail. 3% annual SNAP benefit increase and 1%
SNAP population growth for 104% annual SNAP spending, 2.5% other USDA program
spending growth for average OMB federal spending growth of about 3% for the
USDA including SNAP and nearly exactly 2.5% without SNAP. Maria Rodale for Agriculture Secretary,
I read her Organic Manifesto and her family has published about organic farming
for three generations.